Jump to content

Visors and sun visors


Leif in Calif

Recommended Posts

There's '49 Cadillac Coupe on the Not Mine forum.  It's such a beautiful design, but I think the visor spoils it. Certainly it's a big drag, aerodynamically speaking. Why were they popular?

Did it have the typical "flip down" interior visors we have today? When did they become common? I had a '46 Chevy pickup at one time, and you couldn't see traffic lights because the top of the windshield was just a little above your horizontal line of sight.  On the Caddy, you'd need to open the door and lean out to see it.

 

 

image.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My '51 Pontiac Chieftain has one that came with it,so it stays.It has a traffic light viewer on the dash that eliminates the problem of not being able to see traffic lights.You can always take the visor off if it doesn't suit you.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Andy J said:

My '51 Pontiac Chieftain has one that came with it,so it stays.It has a traffic light viewer on the dash that eliminates the problem of not being able to see traffic lights.You can always take the visor off if it doesn't suit you.

Same for my 1951 Pontiac.  The little prism on the dash would allow you to see the traffic light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Leif in Calif said:

Why were they popular?

 

They weren't all that popular back when the cars were new. Yes they were a factory option on many cars. And almost every auto parts store in the country sold after-market versions for anything (many of them had to be special ordered).

However, out in the real world, on the roads and in the parking lots? I doubt if more than about one car in a hundred actually had those things.

Many cars of the 1920s had a visor over the windshield. They mostly kept much of the rain off the windshield at low speeds. Wipers were not very good in those earlier years, and most driving was fairly slow. By 1930, most cars were eliminating exterior visors.

Interior sun visors had been around on a few expensive cars and as after-market accessories since the late 1910s, but were somewhat rare (there is that word!). They began showing up in common cars during the 1930s, and being standard on the driver's side (I remember cars that had only one!) about 1940.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I've got a loaded question for you guys.....

 

How fast can you go before you damage something? Like denting the roof or bending the visor or breaking the windshield? I've been 70mph. That was with a factory visor on a 53 Belair. Those were mounted pretty solidly, and the windshield was one piece. Some less streamlined visors like Fultons seem to have pretty spindly mounts. I have even seen some visors mounted to the little chrome divider piece in a 2-piece windshield.

 

So, how fast can you go before all hell breaks loose? I have a feeling some of you know the answer. :ph34r:

 

 

Edited by Bloo (see edit history)
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Leif in Calif said:

Did it have the typical "flip down" interior visors we have today?

Yes. As @wayne sheldon mentioned, maybe just one.

 

9 hours ago, Leif in Calif said:

I had a '46 Chevy pickup at one time, and you couldn't see traffic lights because the top of the windshield was just a little above your horizontal line of sight.  On the Caddy, you'd need to open the door and lean out to see it.

To expand on what @Andy J said, it's a glass or more likely polycarbonate prism that mounts low on the dash or windshield rim. There were 2 common styles, and the late GM one, which is clear, is reproduced for sure. I believe the earlier GM one that does not have a smooth surface is also reproduced, but I am less sure of that. Fulton had one for use with their visors. The Fulton ones are not reproduced as far as I know, but there are mini-replicas of it that stick on with a suction cup. Not for restoration obviously, but as you noted there are some vehicles with the top of the windshield too low even though there is no visor.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wayne sheldon said:

 

They weren't all that popular back when the cars were new. Yes they were a factory option on many cars. And almost every auto parts store in the country sold after-market versions for anything (many of them had to be special ordered).

However, out in the real world, on the roads and in the parking lots? I doubt if more than about one car in a hundred actually had those things.

Many cars of the 1920s had a visor over the windshield. They mostly kept much of the rain off the windshield at low speeds. Wipers were not very good in those earlier years, and most driving was fairly slow. By 1930, most cars were eliminating exterior visors.

Interior sun visors had been around on a few expensive cars and as after-market accessories since the late 1910s, but were somewhat rare (there is that word!). They began showing up in common cars during the 1930s, and being standard on the driver's side (I remember cars that had only one!) about 1940.

My Rickenbacker has an outside sun visor but no interior sun visors.

My Pierce has no outside sun visor but has two interior sun visors.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bloo said:

Yes. As @wayne sheldon mentioned, maybe just one.

 

To expand on what @Andy J said, it's a glass or more likely polycarbonate prism that mounts low on the dash or windshield rim. There were 2 common styles, and the late GM one, which is clear, is reproduced for sure. I believe the earlier GM one that does not have a smooth surface is also reproduced, but I am less sure of that. Fulton had one for use with their visors. The Fulton ones are not reproduced as far as I know, but there are mini-replicas of it that stick on with a suction cup. Not for restoration obviously, but as you noted there are some vehicles with the top of the windshield too low even though there is no visor.

 

I always heard them referred to as 'signal finders'.
Like this one on eBay.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/165943758352

image.png.b4db3a028d7bfe54baa6579612a0d8d2.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My dad's 40 Pontiac didn't have one. My dad's 50 Pontiac did have a factory one that he ordered with the car, and we would do 60-70 mph on the FWY, even with surfboard racks and surfboards. I've seen 55-56 Pontiac's with them and so 57 Pontiacs have the same canopy so would fit, also 55-57 Chevrolet also use the same "A" body canopy. In 1958 the shades are gone, so Pontiac (or GM) designed an internal or inside shade used only in 58. See below.

  image.png.876152d4829857d37e2aa652e01cf5c8.pngimage.png.8e9b2991a14a98098db9f7a1ea2b1105.pngimage.png.e3fc5cfa6ef97d24882b3fa4ed6eefb3.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Visors, like the rest of the car. Need to have a design and style to them. They need to be designed to fit the shape and flow of the car. They need to look like they belong there, part of the car. Some visors look like a wide board turned sideways with industrial hinges on the side. They also need to follow the curve of the roof line, from a side profile. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bloo said:

So I've got a loaded question for you guys.....

 

How fast can you go before you damage something? Like denting the roof or bending the visor or breaking the windshield? I've been 70mph. That was with a factory visor on a 53 Belair. Those were mounted pretty solidly, and the windshield was one piece. Some less streamlined visors like Fultons seem to have pretty spindly mounts. I have even seen some visors mounted to the little chrome divider piece in a 2-piece windshield.

 

So, how fast can you go before all hell breaks loose? I have a feeling some of you know the answer. :ph34r:

 

 

 

  90 MPH plus with my 1950.   Never came loose or broke anything.  

 

  Ben

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From before I drove legally, and until well after I was married, I only had convertibles, and never had an external visor.

As I recall, the only convertible with the external visor I've ever really noticed was a "Step-Down" Hudson", and It seemed unusual, at least to me.

 

With regard to Internal "Flip-Down" visors, here's an unusual one:

My 1937 Buick Roadmaster Phaeton has the sun visors mounted to the convertible top's front header bow , and in a double-hinged arrangement.

It works fine when the top is closed,

but with the top down (in the open position) there is no option for glare protection at all, other than a hat or your hand blocking the sun's rays to see the traffic light.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any one know how many manufacturers produced a exterior visor for their cars? Hudson had a visor. And they look really nice on the cars, if you like visors. They fit the shape and flow of the cars. Only problem with them, you can not spin down the roof mounted antenna with the visor on. Antenna is ether up, or left resting folded down between the windshields.

7F0D8AD1-FECF-453B-BF20-9D2C258DE8B8.jpeg

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, EmTee said:

Lots of cars used a shaded band across the top of the windshield through the 1960s and into the '70s.  I assume this was to provide similar function without the external visor.

 

image.png.9a9212b3f9f561f804a90d7e01fc3967.png

No doubt they had a similar function. There was a lot of work put into auto glass design as aerodynamics came more into play when fuel economy became more important about 1980. As cars became more aerodynamic, the windshield was laid back and as a result became bigger. Bigger flatter glass is 1.) Heavier because glass is made of sand and sand is made of rocks and 2.) it increases the solar load so more A/C capability is required, which also effects mileage. Tinted glass became standard, and a number of other approaches have been (and continue to be) tried, but so far, no magic bullet.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Xander Wildeisen said:

Visors, like the rest of the car. Need to have a design and style to them. They need to be designed to fit the shape and flow of the car. They need to look like they belong there, part of the car. Some visors look like a wide board turned sideways with industrial hinges on the side. They also need to follow the curve of the roof line, from a side profile. 

Do you mean like this?

image.png.c203baf7c71039b805c56cf13907a1a6.png

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Hans1965 said:

Xander,  I totally agree, it is ruining the design in my point of view. Makes it look like a Chevy (sorry!). But you rarely see these 48/49 Caddies with outside visors. 

You must know 1949-1952 "A" bodies were styled like 1948-49 Cadillac and Olds 98 "C" bodies and 1950 Buick.

image.png.3c7f6a3d09cb3739cfd922b8d17e756c.png

image.png.bbcd7bc410a2dd9408f8f62114f85671.png

image.png.38dc4698ba845b519cb873f80fcb12ea.png

image.png.a6564a2f99bd85144e5d8643c3814bc0.png

ALL of these cars have "Flow through fender styling".

image.png

Edited by Pfeil (see edit history)
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Pfeil said:

You must know 1949-1952 "A" bodies were styled like 1948-49 Cadillac and Olds 98 "C" bodies and 1950 Buick.

 

ALL of these cars have "Flow through fender styling".

 

I have a 52 Catalina and 49 Riviera. Even on these hardtops I am not a big fan of outside visors. On the fastbacks even less. But thats my personal opinion.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The visor generally does not enhance the look of those late 1940's- early 1950's cars though were so much "of the period" they're acceptable on family sedans.  There is one visor, made by The Canadian Vision Visor Company of Rodney, Ontario, Canada, which is color Plexiglas, would be great to have a car of complementing or matching color.

Canadian Vision Visor Co. Rodney, ONT. CN b.jpg

Canadian Vision Visor Co. Rodney, ONT. CN c.jpg

'49 Eight blue visor -dual tailights.jpg

'49 Eight blue visor -cropped.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 58L-Y8 said:

The visor generally does not enhance the look of those late 1940's- early 1950's cars though were so much "of the period" they're acceptable on family sedans.  There is one visor, made by The Canadian Vision Visor Company of Rodney, Ontario, Canada, which is color Plexiglas, would be great to have a car of complementing or matching color.

Canadian Vision Visor Co. Rodney, ONT. CN b.jpg

Canadian Vision Visor Co. Rodney, ONT. CN c.jpg

'49 Eight blue visor -dual tailights.jpg

'49 Eight blue visor -cropped.jpg

Not trying to be harsh, but those are the ugliest visors ever made. They look like a free door prize just for showing up. Looking through that blue visor at a stop light would turn the lights into turquoise, green and purple. Throw in a touch of alcohol, and you could tell the cop, “I swear the light was green officer “😵‍💫

  • Like 2
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

for some people if you want the car loaded .........wide white walls ,fender skirts,gas door chrome trim,yellow glass fog lights,optional hood ornament,spot light.....heck...dual spot lights ....even if they are dummie spots.....curb feelers,optional exhaust tip.....with the enamel logo of car make of course,fuzzy dice......maybe even some dingle balls above the side windows inside,blue dots in the tail lights.window ice cube air conditioner,window vent shades,accessory bumper guards,.........then why not a sun visor......and dont forget the headlight visors too...........its all about being period correct.....right eh ? ........hehe

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...