Jump to content

Coupe Utility vehicles as Tank Hunters? (Story research!)


Guest Mr. Ute

Recommended Posts

Guest Mr. Ute

Hello! I'm fresh off the internet after researching about Coupe Utility-class cars from the early 50s to the early 80s, and I thought I would ask the people who might know more than some older websites (or know people who know more)!

 

I am currently collecting information for a story idea, which will at the least be a short story or series of vignettes, and at most (in the future, of course), be a short or full length film. 

 

The main crux is this: Set in Saskatchewan (and likely other places in Canada, as that is my home country), a small group of people are fighting off an invasion from another country (as yet undecided, but this would be set between 1990 and 2020, so it's anyone's guess). As the enemy is fielding tanks and APCs, the ragtag guerilla group of civilians are using older Coupe Utility vehicles with assault guns mounted over the roofs (the mounting is set in the flatbed). For story reasons, these are the only vehicles available to utilize the mounted guns while still being fast enough to avoid return fire from tanks/infantry. They would obviously be retrofitted with armour and lift kits to allow them to withstand the rigours of combat, but the majority of what I am interested in is what sort of ability these utility vehicles had over trucks. 

 

Obviously they handled more like cars than trucks, given a lower profile and different mechanics, but in general, I am looking for help understanding the differences in transmissions and engine types, what problems might arise from such a situation (wear and tear on the vehicles from firing the guns, etc), and suggestions for better models and makes if possible.

 

Please feel free to criticize or question; I realize this is a bit outlandish compared to your standard conversations about antique cars. I will provide the specifications I have assigned each make and link to pictures of their general design.

 

- '59 Chevrolet El Camino; 4.6L V8 Engine; 4-Speed Manual Transmission

1959 El Camino

1959 El Camino (Different Angle)

- '58 Ford Ranchero; 5.8L V8 Engine; 3-Speed Automatic Transmission

Ford Ranchero

Ford Ranchero (Back View)

- '69 Toyota Crown S50; 2.3L 2M I6 Engine; 4-Speed Manual Transmission

Toyota Crown S50

Toyota Crown S50

- '77 Holden Belmont; 4.2L V8 Engine; 3-Speed Automatic Transmission

Holden Belmont

Holden Belmont

- 64 Ford Falcon Deluxe Utility; 3.3L I6 Engine; 2-Speed Automatic Transmission

Ford Falcon Deluxe Utility

Ford Falcon Deluxe Utility

-'79 Ford Durango; 3.3L I6 Engine; 3-Speed Automatic Transmission

Ford Durango

Ford Durango

- '56 Dodge Kingsway Utility; 3.6L I6 Engine; Could not find specifications for Transmission options on this make

Dodge Kingsway Coupe Utility

Dodge Kingsway Coupe Utility

- '72 GMC Sprint; 7.4L V8 Engine; 4-Speed Manual Transmission

GMC Sprint

GMC Sprint

 

Additionally, if anyone can identify which of these might be faster or slower over each other, that would be of great help. I am woefully uneducated in the world of cars, so most of the specifications are alien to me. Their main tactic is a hit-and-run Wolf pack technique, with the lower-caliber Utes (a common nickname for a Coupe Utility) swinging by in waves from different angles to disorient and confuse the larger and well-armed (not to mention armoured) tanks while the other Utes that have heavier guns take aim. I chose to have the guns mounted over the cab for two reasons: One, it provides a static mount that is close to the main bulk of the vehicle (the engine) and removes the need for complicated turning mechanisms that could jam, and Two, the driver would be driving head-on towards the tanks, providing forward momentum to partially counteract the heavy assault gun firing. Other Utes might have machine guns instead, but the main questions i'm puzzling out involve large tank weaponry mounted on Coupe Utility vehicles.

 

Thank you for your time, and any feedback/criticism is welcome! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless this is science fiction my answer would be "none of the above". Only the American made models would even exist on the prairies and they would be vanishingly rare and confined to collectors garages and museums.

 

I can see prairie farm boys putting up a good fight using home made equipment. Possibly 50 caliber machine guns mounted in the box of  Chevrolet, Ford and Dodge 4 wheel drive pickup trucks with mud bog tires.

 

The recoil from anything larger like an anti tank gun might be too much for the vehicle.

 

But to set these home made jobs against tanks is not real. Modern tanks could kill them from a mile away (or more).

 

They would have to develop guerilla tactics like a case of dynamite in a culvert, that you can blow as a tank passes over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you have any idea how many Chargers the Dukes of Hazard TV show went through ? Typically they could jump. Once. The cars (were on a car chassis like an El Camino or Ranchero) were not built for any kind of fast rough country driving.

 

Second there is a reason "technicals" mount light machine guns  and hand held antitank weapons (bazooka, LAW) are rockets that exhaust out the back of the device. When an A10 was configured for "tankbusting" first they went to full military power before firing or they were liable to stall. Recoil is interesting.

 

Be better to start with a tractor (as in semi, not farm) or flatbed. Besides a diesel can be made to run on almost anything.

 

Rusty has the right idea. Maybe you were watching the El Camino in "Machete Kill" but kids in near stock light utilities against a tank would just be road kill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mr. Ute said:

Hello! I'm fresh off the internet after researching about Coupe Utility-class cars from the early 50s to the early 80s, and I thought I would ask the people who might know more than some older websites (or know people who know more)!

 

I am currently collecting information for a story idea, which will at the least be a short story or series of vignettes, and at most (in the future, of course), be a short or full length film. 

 

The main crux is this: Set in Saskatchewan (and likely other places in Canada, as that is my home country), a small group of people are fighting off an invasion from another country (as yet undecided, but this would be set between 1990 and 2020, so it's anyone's guess). As the enemy is fielding tanks and APCs, the ragtag guerilla group of civilians are using older Coupe Utility vehicles with assault guns mounted over the roofs (the mounting is set in the flatbed). For story reasons, these are the only vehicles available to utilize the mounted guns while still being fast enough to avoid return fire from tanks/infantry. They would obviously be retrofitted with armour and lift kits to allow them to withstand the rigours of combat, but the majority of what I am interested in is what sort of ability these utility vehicles had over trucks. 

Your movie idea reads like a direct rip off from the Mad Max series

 

Coupe Utilities are still made and sold in Australia (but not for much longer) 

And in Eu, Asia & South America, but often based on 4 cylinder fwd cars

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More realistic would be a bunch of Diesel Pickups.  You can tune/ modify them to have pretty impressive performance from roasting off the tires and drag racing to mighty pulling machines.  What would look wilder than flames from the stacks on each side of the gunner in the bed?   After all it is Movie fiction anyways.   Probably cheaper and easier to find than any Hudson or Studebaker expresses or at the rate they are going even Elcamino and Rancheros.  

I could just imagine a 50 Caliber in the bed of a Dodge Rampage or Subaru brat though.  You might have a tough time finding either of those though with enough sheetmetal left to attach anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suggest you look at film of "technicals", of various insurgent and armed forces, in action to see how they react to weapons mounted on them being fired. Coupe utility vehicles will be lighter (will they even have a separate chassis?) and two wheel drive so won't last long.

 

Your guerillas, driving such light vehicles, will have to be very clever and fast to avoid being shot up a mile away in their first engagement.

 

Remember tank armor is pretty good these days. Depleted uranium (which is very dense) is used in the core of armor-piercing shells so your light vehicles might not be able to carry very many.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Set in Saskatchewan? As someone who is a big fan of the Corner Gas tv series i would find it hard to take the story you described seriously. I would be looking for Dog River being mentioned at least. For anyone here who has never heard of Corner Gas, its a great Canadian comedy set in Dog River Saskatchewan. Im sure you can watch episodes online, check it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ragtop4two said:

Set in Saskatchewan? As someone who is a big fan of the Corner Gas tv series i would find it hard to take the story you described seriously. I would be looking for Dog River being mentioned at least. For anyone here who has never heard of Corner Gas, its a great Canadian comedy set in Dog River Saskatchewan. Im sure you can watch episodes online, check it out.

That occurred to me too. For those not familiar with the Canadian prairie watch a few episodes of Corner Gas, and see if you can figure out where you could hide your Mad Max vehicle from a modern tank with a cannon range of several miles, and infra red scope.

 

In BC your invaders would have it much, much tougher. A few deer hunters with a case of dynamite and a few cases of Molotov cocktails could wipe out a dozen tanks if they caught them on a mountain road,

Edited by Rusty_OToole (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cap: Very Interesting.  That led to the M40 106 mm recoilless rifle (anti tank designed for light vehicles). Also  the ONTOS were returned to the states, de-armored, and used for construction/rescue work. So it is within feasibility that the locals could have one or two of the hulls.

 

While the ONTOS had a top speed of 30 mph I suspect that without the armor plus a little hotrodding (GM 302 straight 6 was popular for hotrodding in the 50's so nitrous bottles ?) & two guns (was a proposal for amphibious use) it might exceed that. Think you might be ONTOS something.

 

Further the M40 had a 0.50 caliber Remington M8C Spotting Rifle mounted on top which could be replaced with a SMG.

 

Seems within Artistic License that you could find an armory full of M40s (apparently still in use worldwide), plus a couple of surplus ONTOS hulls and mount M40s on a number of technicals as well. Further a little movie magic and HICAMs could have the hulls doing 60MPH +. (Like an M1 with the governor removed). Finally with just a hull mounting twin M40s you are talking about 3 feet high & hide almost anywhere.

 

Speculation like this is fun & an ONTOS (or surplus hull) could be AACA eligible....

Edited by padgett (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having been in the Air Force, I had no idea what an "ONTOS" was, so I looked it up.  This is what I found:

 

M50a1ontos.jpg

 

Is this what you're talking about captndan and padgett?

 

 

Then I found this thing, the M274 A5 Mechanical Mule mounting a single 106mm recoilless rifle:

 

M274mule106mmRRhaugh%20(1).jpg

 

These, minus the 106mm recoilless rifles, occasionally show up on ebay.

 

 

When I encountered this, I had to quit surfing and check out my rum supply:

 

1024px-Vespa_militare1.JPG

 

Now I think I've seen everything.

 

Cheers,

Grog

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think we are on to something here: an anti-tank motorcycle. Talk about a hot seat.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vespa_150_TAP

 

Remember trying a mule north of Vegas, was unsafe at any speed. Think the wheel was designed for an Isetta. Can see the .50 cal "spotting rifle" on top.

Edited by padgett (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "Pig" was quite a sight when it was firing those 106s.

 

At Khe Sanh, after the siege, I salvaged three Mules that had been blown up and managed to build a running one from the junkers. I was told that I couldn't drive it because I  had not been to "Mule School". I decided to disregard this bit of pedantic advice. 10 months of combat tends to give you a surly attitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes the track vehicle is an ONTOS.  We had a few of them in Vietnam.  The idea was to sneak up on the target fire the 106's turn around and run like hell.  The 50 cal. On top was a single shot spotting rifle.  And 60mph is more like it.  No armor made of aluminum.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. Ute if you are still following this thread I have 2 suggestions. One is to write about something else, something you know about. If you pursue this line you will drop klangers right and left. The other suggestion is to go ahead with your original plan but find someone with combat experience like a Canadian veteran who served in Iraq or Afghanistan. They came up against just the kind of rebels or guerrilas with home made equipment you are talking about. I should think such veterans have a few ideas of their own and some of them are very interesting.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be the odd man out I say go for the list you provided as they would be far more visually interesting to see on screen, and I do like the Red Dawn sort of vibe to the story. It's a movie, so the tech specs aren't terribly relevant but you seem to have an interest in keeping it close to possible. Maybe less heavy guns and more light machine guns, anti tank weapons like RPG, etc. Home made flame throwers would work as well. Sure the tanks could easily dispatch most of these in real life, but heck, even a dozen Stormtroopers can't hit Luke with their blasters so maybe your crew of under-seige Canadians can find ways to disable their capabilities to a degree. This is where Rusty's suggestion would be useful, ask soldiers with experience in this field what caused them troubles in wartime and what were the effective defenses of the enemy. Of course you may end up on a government watch list for asking these questions, but so be it for art!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...