Jump to content

Ozstatman

Members
  • Posts

    1,991
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Ozstatman

  • Birthday 11/11/1946

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Ozstatman's Achievements

10,000+ Points

10,000+ Points (6/7)

  • Reacting Well
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Dedicated
  • Collaborator
  • Posting Machine Rare

Recent Badges

753

Reputation

  1. That rear fender sweep starts behind the door on the the car in question The actual '57 rear fender sweep starts in the door of the 57 itself. But what do I know? The car is customised, so anything could have happened to.
  2. I think it might be 15 posts. But I could be wrong, it's happened before,πŸ˜‰
  3. Maybe this thread - May be the same car?
  4. Any chance this tag has been fixed to the frame later? If so, it might be possible for the DMV to run the number through its database. Or even if its a factory number it could be in their database. Whether they would tell you might be another matter altogether.
  5. I'm doubly impressed Varun that, besides the "old relics", you have a handle on a much more modern conveyance.πŸ‘πŸ‘
  6. This table of Engine Serial numbers from packardInfo.com will let you determine whether it is a 288 or 327 from the engine number itself.
  7. ....Back in 2011 while visiting a restoration workshop, Vintage Motor Garage, north of Sydney, Australia saw this pair of Cadillacs being rebodied to turn into V16 Roadsters. Floor sweepings, car porn or art? Wonder what happened to them?
  8. On another Website Classic2Current has been mentioned as a possible source. Wouldn't hurt to give them a try.
  9. When a top "runs", it spins then falls over on its side. I hope it didn't do that!πŸ˜‰πŸ˜
  10. Expressing my ignorance here, but could an oversized piston be turned down to stock size and retain sufficient integrity and strength to be viable? Would think, using the .030 oversize wouldn't lose much material.
×
×
  • Create New...