Jump to content

1942 DeSoto DeLuxe Coupe


Recommended Posts

From Hemmings website. Beautiful car priced way beyond my means.  No cut for me if it sells.

 

https://www.hemmings.com/classifieds/cars-for-sale/desoto/deluxe/2584021.html?itm_source=homepage&itm_medium=Classifieds&itm_campaign=Recirculation

 

 

1942 DeSoto DeLuxe Coupe

 

 

88660935.jpg

 

88660938.jpg

 

88660941.jpg

Edited by plymouthcranbrook (see edit history)
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seller says in his listing that this was an original "black out" car so does that mean that all the chrome and bright trim on the car now would have been painted originally?

Just curious, I think the chrome looks terrific.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, GregLaR said:

Seller says in his listing that this was an original "black out" car so does that mean that all the chrome and bright trim on the car now would have been painted originally?

Uhhhhh. . . . .yeah. . . . . .The last production month for the 1942 model year was basically just to use up parts that were on hand so that they did not have to be disposed of. (wasted). Between Pearl Harbor (12/7/1941) and the end of January 1942 there was a lot of discussion about whether production of SOME TYPE of civilian car would continue during the war?   

Perhaps a single model and body style from a single manufacture? 

Perhaps a single model and body style from EACH manufacture? 

In any event, the use of all superfluous chrome was going to be forbidden. 

 

The War Production Board (WPB) and the Office of Price Administration (OPA) did not want to give a marketing/sales edge to any manufacture that had stocked up on chrome parts very early in the production year. (read GM) So they ruled that NO chrome (or stainless) TRIM was going to be allowed. (Note: Bumpers were always chromed) 

 

So, in the last weeks of production - Some makes used paint over bare diecast. Some used paint OVER previously chromed diecast.

Some used mild steel stampings that were painted. Some painted over previously produced stainless. (The few original blackout cars I have inspected sometimes have combinations of paint over chrome and paint over bare metal indicative of using up parts on hand) 

Again this was all with the idea that there would be a full 1942 (and 1943, 1944. . . ) model years. 

 

60+ days of scrambling, and quotas, and rulemaking, after Pearl Harbor and the bureaucrats decided to just pull the plug on everyone. Impounding and rationing all the new cars on hand. 

 

FYI - "Black out" cars were NOT ugly! The manufactures devised wonderful combinations of light body colors with contrasting dark (painted) trim and Dark body colors with light colored trim. High contrast and all beautifully coordinated.  Commonly with extra pinstriping.

 

However it seems that perhaps during a restoration it is easier to just chrome everything and then tell people that it WAS a rare blackout 1942, than it is to research and restore it authentically.   

 

Whitewalls on a 1942 always look out of place. 

The upholstery doesn't look correct to me, but I don't know Mopars

Edited by m-mman (see edit history)
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems to me that much of what the seller has to say is highly suspect.  Take, for example, the horrible interior on this $59K car.  He says it's made with "NOS fabric" that was still on the roll from the factory.  From a factory in the 60's maybe.  Check out the door panels, tufted with buttons covered with the same odd fabric.  I'm no DeSoto expert, but I have a very hard time believing that this is a correct interior.  And the interesting part is that the seller actually seems to pick his words very carefully -- he doesn't actually say that it's correct, only that it was stitched from "NOS" fabric on a roll from "the factory."  The black out part is also quite confusing, as noted above.  My BS meter is pretty much pegged from reading his copy!

 

(However, I have to say that the '42 Chrysler he's offering as part of a "package deal" looks very nice from the few photos he shares.)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, neil morse said:

Take, for example, the horrible interior on this $59K car.

The only thing I noticed was the buttons on the seat bottom did not "blend" in with the material pattern on the seat, and the pattern on the buttons was cockeyed. Once noticed, it will bug you every time you see it.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Door panels are definitely wrong.

I'm sure the owner believes the seat fabric is period, but it just looks wrong for prewar, and for the asking price, there should be documentation.

I'm liking that Chrysler in the photo. No cool hideaway lights, but the rest looks pretty good.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tend to agree with you all.  And the onus is on the

seller to document that his car is correct.

 

Some carmakers, though, offered more than one

interior fabric.  This was especially true of luxury

marques, such as Cadillac and Lincoln.  In the case

of Cadillac in the 1970's, for example, the catalogues

didn't come close to showing all the interior possibilities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If green 1942 Desotos would have had an unusual green striped interior like that, would blue 1942 Desotos have had blue striped seats or red 1942 DeSotos red striped seats? That would have been pretty wild for the early 40s and especially for a vehicle from rather conservative Chrysler Corporation. If there actually had been interiors like that available in 1942 collectors & afficionados would still be talking about them today just like they are still pointing out Chrysler's famous Highlander interiors. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...