Jump to content

Information about Stutz Bearcat


thebum

Recommended Posts

Hello, I am hoping that someone will be able to give me more info about this car which I believe is a Stutz Bearcat. The photo, according to the Date written on the back of the photo, was taken on 15 May, 1919, I presume in Atlantic City, New Jersey. My Grandmother is sitting on the front of the hood. I do have the name of who I believe was the owner, who was from Philadelphia, PA and Atlantic City, New Jersey, if that would be helpful. I would like to add this info to my Tree on Ancestry.com . Thank You 

fampics924.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello thebum, I believe the automobile is a 1912 Hupmobile  model 20 runabout. The steering wheel is probably wrapped because they were wood dovetailed together and always seemed to separate. The blob is the horn, the horn bulb is located in front of the shift levers outside the drivers side false door. However, it should be mounted on the dashboard by the hood, where it always got wacked (probably why the car owner moved it). I also do not see any kerosene cowl lights ( unless the thing that looks like an upside down bag is a light), which should be mounted at the top outside edge of the dashboard. The sidelight brackets are not correct nor in the right location. The speedometer head would be mounted on the inside of the dashboard, inside the vehicle. The Prestolite tank is correct as are the headlights. The radiator neck if it were visible would be very tall. A very fun car to drive, only downside for some folks is the two speed transmission. Thanks for posting, and as always stand to be corrected. Diane

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, scotchyoke said:

Hello thebum, I believe the automobile is a 1912 Hupmobile  model 20 runabout. The steering wheel is probably wrapped because they were wood dovetailed together and always seemed to separate. The blob is the horn, the horn bulb is located in front of the shift levers outside the drivers side false door. However, it should be mounted on the dashboard by the hood, where it always got wacked (probably why the car owner moved it). I also do not see any kerosene cowl lights ( unless the thing that looks like an upside down bag is a light), which should be mounted at the top outside edge of the dashboard. The sidelight brackets are not correct nor in the right location. The speedometer head would be mounted on the inside of the dashboard, inside the vehicle. The Prestolite tank is correct as are the headlights. The radiator neck if it were visible would be very tall. A very fun car to drive, only downside for some folks is the two speed transmission. Thanks for posting, and as always stand to be corrected. Diane

Not a Hupmobile. Look closer at the front springs. They are full-elliptical like a buggy with no frame horns. The radiator is a totally different shape, too.

Edited by keiser31 (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for all of the replies, Hupmobile and Cameron are cars that I have never heard of before. I copied the photo of the 1910 Cameron "Six Flyer" and compared the photos. The front springs look the same to me but the photo of the Cameron has what looks like a tool box on the driver side running board and the photo that I posted has a tank of some sort on the running board. I did post this photo on the "What Is It" Forum. Thank You, the Bum

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bolt on accessories like tool boxes and acetylene  tanks are not good details to use for identification.  Even if shown in a catalog photo many time the actual production cars will vary in detail. And many times accessories like this were either added by the selling dealer or added later by the cars owner. Even body styles are at times an unreliable means of identification. Restyling a few years old car was reasonably common in this era, likewise installing a stripped down sports body. Some factory sports body cars like the mystery car were made, however there were also many one off versions produced by individual owners or independent shops.

 Chassis details are a much more reliable means of identification on early era cars.

 

Greg in Canada

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 5 years later...
On 10/27/2018 at 9:33 PM, thebum said:

Hello, I am hoping that someone will be able to give me more info about this car which I believe is a Stutz Bearcat. The photo, according to the Date written on the back of the photo, was taken on 15 May, 1919, I presume in Atlantic City, New Jersey. My Grandmother is sitting on the front of the hood. I do have the name of who I believe was the owner, who was from Philadelphia, PA and Atlantic City, New Jersey, if that would be helpful. I would like to add this info to my Tree on Ancestry.com . Thank You 

fampics924.jpg

1910 Middleby 25Hp (Custom) Runabout

 

Attached Photos 1) 1910 Middleby 25Hp Touring, 2) 1910 Middleby 25Hp Runabout Ad

 

Manufacturer : 1908 - 1913 Middleby Automobile Co. - Reading, Pennsylvania.

6117295566_be929fa636_o.jpg

s-l1600.jpg

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stutz cars from this time period are quite a bit bigger than the car in your photo. The Middleby like your grandmother is sitting on was a relatively small car. If a Stutz and a Middleby were parked beside each other the size difference would be quite apparent.

Edited by 1912Staver (see edit history)
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always found the friendly rivalry between Stutz and Mercer interesting. As a longtime hobbyist that has been privileged to personally know sever major collectors over the years, I have managed to sit in on discussions by owners of both marques. I have been up close, worked on sat in rode in (even drove a couple?) of both companies.

They are kind of like "apples and oranges" as era sports and racing cars go. The Stutz is more the true muscle car of its era, a rather large and very powerful "sports" car! Whereas the Mercer is a medium size sports car, with only about two-thirds the horsepower as the Stutz, but also only about two-thirds the weight. If handling was important for a race? The Mercer had an advantage. If raw power was needed? The Stutz could blow away the competition! (I didn't make that stuff up myself? That is what owners of the cars have told me!)

While the Stutz was bigger, leaner, and meaner? The Mercer had a bit more "flash", with more brightwork (earlier models usually in brass and sometimes lots of it!), giving a bit more "style"!

 

All this to point out that the Middleby appears to be even smaller than the Mercer, itself considerably smaller than the Stutz. The Middleby is a rarely heard of car, I am not sure I have ever heard of one, and that does not happen often for me. I am fairly sure I have never seen one myself. The Middleby is significant in its own special way.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations Varun !  I think you nailed it. Interesting that it ended up being air cooled after all. That pesky radiator neck or lack of, became a key point.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...