1912Staver

Members
  • Content Count

    2,478
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

965 Excellent

About 1912Staver

  • Rank
    HCCA Member
  • Birthday 06/30/1958

Profile Information

  • Gender:
    Male
  • Location:
    Langley, B.C. Canada
  • Interests:
    Brass era cars, Packard trucks, Vintage racing cars, Sports cars

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. When I was a kid ; mid 1960's , I would see one of these set ups every now and then. But not very popular even in those days. I think small, lightweight travel trailers like those from Boler more or less knocked them out of the market. Greg in Canada
  2. Probably I am out of touch on roof costs, so lets say $50,000, still sounds cheap to keep the cars dry. You are right, there is all kinds of money flowing in to this little shelf perched between the mountains and the ocean. Trouble is that almost anyone who has lived and worked all their life here has precious little of it unless you sell up and move hundreds (thousands) of miles away and start over. A big step with lots of potential pitfalls. Greg in Canada
  3. In any event what's a roof going to cost ? $25,000-35, 000 max. That's the cost of two or three of the cars or less. The building is a more important component in a collection than the cars themselves in most cases. Even if the building is in a cheap area the cost of the cars still adds up over time , why not protect that investment? I realize many locations have reasonably-priced property, but that just makes the overall cost that much more affordable. Local to me a corner gas station in a desirable location sold last year for $72,000,000 (16,000 square foot property, zoning allows a condo tower to be built in its place) so you can see how any commercial building is multiple millions. I just can't believe how cheap buildings are smaller U.S. towns. No wonder 3/4 of the worlds population want's to live in the U.S. Greg
  4. Some people are hard to figure. There is a significant outlay on the cars. And a building like that would be $3 or 4 million minimum in my part of the world, and yet the owner does not keep up with things like simple roof maintenance. The logic escapes me. Greg in Canada
  5. Blackhawk are in the upper crust of jacks. Any I have seen have that distinctive ridged top cylinder casting. I always consider them worth rebuilding. The hydraulics contractor that we used extensively on the ship I worked on said his shop could cost effectively repair any of the old decent quality North American jacks and other shop hydraulics, press rams etc. He said the repairs might run as much as a new offshore unit in a worst case scenario, but could then be expected to last at least 25 years in normal home shop use vs the decade if you are lucky many experience with the offshore, el -cheapo units. Like others have said , more of a usable vintage tool than a true collectable. Greg in Canada
  6. I have been a big fan of Aston's for as long as I can remember. Most likely the early Bond movies made me aware of them as a boy, but there were a few of the regular DB series cars in my area. So as a teenager seeing them in normal use put them more on my radar than the movies exposure did. One of the movie cars was on display for many years at a local restaurant, I found it interesting but when it eventually sold I don't think it was for a really big price. Too soon I guess. In the mid 1970's the down at the heals one's weren't even that expensive when they would pop up for sale every now and then. Never had enough money set aside at the time so no luck in securing one. Then the prices seemed to attach themselves to a very tall elevator. Well out of reach for even a disaster of a starting point these days. 3.3 million pounds for a replica seems insane ! Greg in Canada
  7. With all the economic uncertainty these days it really is anyone's guess. As a number of people who regularly deal in the hobby car market have observed , several segments of the old car market were already in trouble to one degree or another pre - covid. The virus have just made things that much worse. Old cars still seem to be selling ; but from what I can see , only if the price is what would have been considered a definite bargain over the last several years. Price it to sell and it probably will. Otherwise potential buyers seem to be holding very tightly to their wallets. Greg in Canada
  8. I would imagine all but the most obscure periodicals exist in multiple sets and in a number of locations. Some very niche specific industry publications are probably a different story, but any of the general automotive "trade " publications seem to have survived in decent numbers. Magazines like " Horseless Age " turn up quite regularly on ebay, even very early issues. And I would suspect a number of the long established library's have a complete or very nearly complete , bound run. I was a member of the Horseless Carriage Foundation for a few years , decent resource but after searching my car in most of the on line , digitised material I found it was not enough use to me to continue membership beyond the initial couple of years. I suspect they also have quite a bit of additional material that is not yet available through an on line search. Greg in Canada
  9. Personally I would stay with a solid axle TR frame. The TR 4 I.R.S. / TR 6 rear set up isn't really a step forward except producing a softer ride. Trailing arm rear ends { with diagonal rear arm pivots } like the TR set up produce a fair bit of rear axle " steer " when on and off the gas in a corner. You get used to it eventually, but less than optimal handling. TVR used the same basic mechanical parts { diff , 1/2 shafts } with their own geometry, hub carriers , control arms to much better effect. TR diff's are on the weak side, any of the more powerful TVR engine options substituted a Salisbury { Jag style } diff for the Triumph unit found in the smaller engine, base model cars. By staying with a TR4 frame you can always swap in something like a Mustang 2 or Capri rear end that can live with the aluminum V8 torque. People do put V8's in TR 6's but it usually does not take long to figure out where the weak links in the chain are. A TR6 and a TR 250 as well as 3 TVR's in my past. The TVR's win hands down in my mind as far as chassis engineering is concerned. TR 6 based components but used much more correctly. Greg in Canada
  10. Triumph developed the GT 6 from the Spitfire. Which was developed from the largely unloved { North America at least } Herald / Vitesse. Both the Spitfire and GT 6 were simple , somewhat lovable cars let down by pretty inadequate mechanicals, build quality and general Engineering execution. But the general concept had a lot of merit. Datsun took the concept; worked out the many shortcomings of Triumph's attempt, and came up with a true winner. The 240Z ! The "Z" had a few shortcomings of its own, mostly related to body rust and low durability vinyl in the interior. But otherwise a true milestone car. The only thing Datsun missed was offering both a GT version { the 240 Z as we all know it}, and a roadster version along the lines of Triumph's Spitfire. Some have been built by enthusiasts but Datsun missed a big sales opportunity in my opinion. Other than being a cheap and moderately cheerful , entry level sports car. The Triumph versions don't have a lot to recommend them for. Greg in Canada
  11. Spitfire frames don't work well with aftermarket body's . They are too integrated with the Spitfire and GT 6 body shell to be adapted to something else unless you use most of the Spitfire body shell as well. Also apart from the excellent front suspension parts and steering rack, as used on countless Lotus models and purpose built racing cars { all the way up to Formula 1 } of the 1960's and 70's , Spitfires are fairly underwhelming mechanically. TR 3 and 4 frames are a better starting point, particularly the TR 4 with rack and pinion steering. TR 3 's use a conventional steering box . Greg Spitfire TR4, { non I.R.S.}, TR 3 is quite similar
  12. I definitely applaud the efforts of the AACA ! Digitisation, indexing and access are key and it looks like the AACA is leading the way. Great to hear the McLaughlin material will soon be accessible. Even here in Western Canada I almost never run into any McLaughlin material older than about 1935. My interest is generally 1925 and older and apart from a few photocopy's I don't think I have seen more than 4 or 5 original pieces of 1925 or older McLaughlin lit. in the flesh and that's over the last 35 years that I have been looking. I get the feeling that a serious obstacle in the donation and the preserving of large collections is the shipping. I would imagine that the vast majority of donations consist largely of material the library already has. So the library staff must sort through hundreds or thousands of items to find the few not already within the library. It must be a monumental task over time. The surplus items can of course be resold to defray the shipping and staff time cost but still a very effort intensive process. No one needs 25 or 30, 1951 Buick sales brochures but I suspect the library has had at least that number pass through its hands over the years. A online data base of what the library already has might some day help guide would be donations and prevent the unnecessary task of dealing with duplicate material. Unless of course revenue from surplus sales is actually paying proposition. Greg
  13. In many climates they aged quickly. Rust and general deterioration. Ripped seats and tops. By the time they were several years old they were very cheap on the used car market. A fiberglass body seemed like a quick and practical solution, but a minimized by the marketing dept. ton of work. More than a few beater sports cars in my youth. Greg in Canada
  14. Definitely it is not enough just to amass a collection of material. Almost all of us have done that from the scale of a few brochures and a shop manual all the way up to a Harrah or Walter Miller sized collection. The big problem is to index and make available to the public that collective mass of material. A truly vast undertaking. The next decade is crucial for all the non mainstream material as much of it will change hands over that time. And every time it transfers the likelihood it will be lost forever increases. Greg in Canada
  15. That's a great deal, is should sell in a blink. You are way too far away to be interested. Always been partial to them, the original designer/ builder was from my area. Greg in Canada