nzcarnerd Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 A photo taken in Christchurch, New Zealand in 1919. I am sure I have seen one of this type of car before but have a blank on what it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Paterson 6-42? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keiser31 Posted December 10, 2017 Share Posted December 10, 2017 Not a Paterson. The radiator shell on the car in question has sharp angles in the cutout where it turns down from the top. The other car has curves there. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stinky Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Mitchell. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leif Holmberg Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 As "Stinky" say, Mitchell 1919 on this picture. Leif in Sweden. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caddyshack Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Could be a Mitchell. The tops are different, two glass windows vs. one window. One looks right hand drive and the other left hand drive. Nice pictures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Henderson Posted December 15, 2017 Share Posted December 15, 2017 The Mitchell's cowl length, its side hinge height location, and position of the windshield on it (but not its mounting fixture) look more like the Patterson's, but the radiator filler looks like the Mitchell's. (Could it be a Mitchterson..?) , But it looks longer to me than in either of Bloo's or Leif's pictures. In 1918 Mitchell had a 127" wheelbase, in '19 thru '22 there were 2 wheelbases, one 120" and the other 127", while in the corresponding years the Patterson had no wheelbase over 120". A tough nut to crack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Dobbin Posted December 17, 2017 Share Posted December 17, 2017 Found this on the way to the Forum today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Schramm Posted December 17, 2017 Share Posted December 17, 2017 Now why would you get what appears to be the right rear tire with chains under the front of the car, or is it the right rear tire that ended up under the right front position? Would you ever drive a car of this vintage with tire chains on the front, one side only? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul Dobbin Posted December 17, 2017 Share Posted December 17, 2017 With car on the sidewalk, it's possible that it hit the fence while going backwards, tearing the right rear wheel off. Looks like black ice to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFindlay Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 It's also possible that it's Hollywood - a picture from a movie or TV show. Look at the car behind the crashed one. It's wearing a significant amount of snow on its hood and fenders, but there's very little snow anywhere else. Is this a colorized picture? If not, shouldn't it be black and white? I think it looks a little staged. Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickelroadster Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 Also note that the left side rear tire has chains and the front doesn't. I think it is pretty obvious that the tire with chains is the other rear tire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curti Posted December 18, 2017 Share Posted December 18, 2017 This pix was poster in the General Discussion forum a year or so ago. I believe this pix is staged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ric Dean Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 ...Car was hit hard by another vehicle on the lower LH side at an angle in which it was forced up over the Street Curbing ripping the RH rear wheel off and the Car came to rest on it. Notice that there was no damage to the Iron fence but RH front fender had made contact causing slight damage to it. ...The snow on the other car could have come from that car just being in another location minutes before i.e. Mountains in California to the North East Great Lakes- ‘Lake effect Snow’ narrow bands (I see it happen all the time). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keiser31 Posted December 31, 2017 Share Posted December 31, 2017 I think the car hit the tree before it came to rest near the fence. I see snow on the running board apron. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Mellor NJ Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 The black guy looks like he has an ear ring. Odd for that time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzcarnerd Posted January 5, 2018 Author Share Posted January 5, 2018 44 minutes ago, Dave Mellor NJ said: The black guy looks like he has an ear ring. Odd for that time I don't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzcarnerd Posted January 5, 2018 Author Share Posted January 5, 2018 The car is a mess. As was said earlier it hit several things. Do you reckon it is a Mitchell? Hard to say with the radiator covered. If it is, it is a different year from the pic at the top. Note the fenders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Schramm Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 I like the winter blanket that is covering the engine compartment and the adjustable flap in front of the radiator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Craig Gillingham Posted January 5, 2018 Share Posted January 5, 2018 I think this is a Saxon Six. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzcarnerd Posted January 5, 2018 Author Share Posted January 5, 2018 6 hours ago, Craig Gillingham said: I think this is a Saxon Six. Note also it has both DC and Maryland plates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drwatson Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 19 hours ago, nzcarnerd said: Note also it has both DC and Maryland plates. I found the write-up explaining dual license plates on early DC cars: http://dcplates.com/Reciprocity.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now