Mark Huston Posted March 4, 2022 Share Posted March 4, 2022 (edited) Not Mine. Craigslist Ad. https://seattle.craigslist.org/skc/cto/d/auburn-1958-packard-hawk/7453799221.html For sale:1958 Packard Hawk, one of 588 produced. Supercharged 289, AT, Twin Traction rear end. Restoration started many years ago, engine and transmission were rebuilt, has only break in run time on it. Brakes and suspension rebuilt. Supercharger and factory 4 core radiator rebuilt. Resealed gas tank. Many NOS and new/used parts. Extra transmission, specific to both Packard Hawks and Studebaker Golden Hawks. Newer paint, average quality, very little rust. All new interior with correct leather upholstery including seats, outer door arm pads, door panels, dash pad, headliner, carpet, etc. New exhaust, new (older) radial whitewall tires.Hasn’t been started in a several years, will need carb rebuilt. (Kit included) Supercharger, radiator and gas tank need installed.Nice examples of these consistently sell for 60-80K, a few have sold for over 100K. Last pic is one from Barrett Jackson.Also included is a ’58 Packard 4dr sedan, 289, AT w/Twin Traction. Very original and rust free, could be an easy resto as well or use for parts. In storage since the 80's.$28K for both, $25K for Hawk only2 five 3-seven 0 nine-5 six 1 six. Prefer actual phone calls or CL messaging. No shady cryptic texts.Scammers and low ball offers will be ignored. Mind your P’s and Q’s. No dealers, don’t need help selling. Thanks. Not Mine. I have not personal interest in the sale of this 1958 Packard Hawk. Edited March 7, 2022 by Mark Huston (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plymouthcranbrook Posted March 5, 2022 Share Posted March 5, 2022 Not necessarily a comment on this car but I once saw a Packard Hawk at a show and was struck by how unattractive it was. At least to me. And I like 50's Packards. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
suchan Posted March 5, 2022 Share Posted March 5, 2022 38 minutes ago, plymouthcranbrook said: Not necessarily a comment on this car but I once saw a Packard Hawk at a show and was struck by how unattractive it was. At least to me. And I like 50's Packards. I agree. Catfish come to mind. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
58L-Y8 Posted March 5, 2022 Share Posted March 5, 2022 Oh No! The infamous 'Hurley Hawk!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerryB Posted March 5, 2022 Share Posted March 5, 2022 12 hours ago, suchan said: I agree. Catfish come to mind. Yes indeed! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1912Staver Posted March 6, 2022 Share Posted March 6, 2022 An acquired taste to be sure , but I rather like them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingrudy Posted March 6, 2022 Share Posted March 6, 2022 IMO they really took a wrong turn when they changed the styling on this car from '57 to '58. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Hepatica Posted March 7, 2022 Share Posted March 7, 2022 (edited) I'm used to them- they don't look that bad to me today... better than the '58 Packard and Stude sedans with the quad headlights awkwardly forced on the fenders. One photo shows the gold Mylar (or whatever it is) fin insert, one doesn't. I don't know if this was the original color; from the side cowl under the dash, maybe white? Ad deleted. Edited March 7, 2022 by Sal Hepatica Addition (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bryankazmer Posted March 7, 2022 Share Posted March 7, 2022 23 hours ago, kingrudy said: IMO they really took a wrong turn when they changed the styling on this car from '57 to '58. there are no 57 Packard Hawks - one year design Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John_S_in_Penna Posted March 7, 2022 Share Posted March 7, 2022 On 3/5/2022 at 12:44 AM, suchan said: Catfish come to mind. I think you're on to something there, Suchan. Catfish even have fins... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now