Cochie Canyon Dan Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 (edited) Hi folks, found this car frame while out hiking. It was buried along with other items from the early 1900s. From my research the front suspension looks to be pre 1930s but it also seems to be the design of the era from hundreds of car makers many of them "defunked". It now sits as lawn art, any info would be appreciated. Edited July 17, 2018 by Cochie Canyon Dan learning curve..... (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
60FlatTop Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 4 hours ago, Cochie Canyon Dan said: now sits as lawn art Been kinda dry around here, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pontiac59 Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 Best bet would be to see if it has any numbers stamped into it anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1937hd45 Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 No way to attach front brakes so it is @1925 or older. Bob 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cochie Canyon Dan Posted July 18, 2018 Author Share Posted July 18, 2018 Looked on frame inside & out, top & bottom and didn't see anything. Pretty rusted though. Also did research on vin #'s of that era, interesting stuff. After spending hours & hours comparing this frame with images on different sites i can tell that the gas tank was most likely strapped under the cross member at the rear and brackets towards the rear on each side were supports for running boards, steering box was mounted inside with linkage passing thru the frame then down to the arm. Here's are a couple more photos maybe someone might recognize front cross member, looks like an engine mount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vintageben Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 Looks very similar to Chev maybe around that 1924-25 era but I’m not 100% sure of this as the extra cross member for mounting the engine doesn’t look quite right I know some Chevs had them but I have never really studied them well enough that. Anyway if I get a chance today I will have a look at my Chev book Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzcarnerd Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 I think you mean defunct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzcarnerd Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 A measure of the wheelbase might help. What is the distance from the front axle to where the rear axle might go - about the peak of the arch towards the rear. Whatever it was I think it must have had no brakes on the front axle as I see no signs of brackets on the hubs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vila Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 (edited) I am not say it is Chevrolet, but it is not a 1924 Chevrolets since they had quarter elliptical springs. Also look for numbers on the tie rod ends, axle, etc. Edited July 18, 2018 by Vila (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pontiac59 Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 wire brush on a grinder would bring out numbers. That's hardly rusted at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Layden B Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 4 cylinder Buick I think Check out this front crossmember Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lahti35 Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 (edited) I have that exact cross member (3rd one back from front) in my garage and I was told it was off a Chevy... Here's a '27 or '28 frame speedster. Also a pic of a 1925 with the two engine mount cross members visible... Edited July 19, 2018 by Lahti35 (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzcarnerd Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 I note also the steering box on the Chev speedster is directly above the spring mount. On our 1926 Pontiac, which has a similar frame the steering box is several inches behind the spring mount - the and those engine mounts are not there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stretch Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 (edited) I believe your frame is for a Chevy from around 1919. My car shown in the picture started with a heavily modified Chevy frame from around that year. The front frame horns seem very similar to yours as does the shape of the axel. My axel is flat like yours on top where it mates to the springs. The back spring perch is very similar if not exactly like yours. I will try to post a couple more pictures and see what you think. The spring perch picture is upside down as is the frame picture. The frame was getting ready for sand blasting. Edited July 20, 2018 by stretch (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stretch Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 Couple more shots of front axel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cochie Canyon Dan Posted July 20, 2018 Author Share Posted July 20, 2018 I have aprox 8;6' from cen of front axle to rear. Lahti35, your 1927 Chevy speedster frame looks identical. I found the electric starter was invented in 1911 but when did it become an industry standard, the front cross member still has an opening for the crank. Stretch, your 1919 Chevy front end also looks identical. Could a frame design be used on different models for consecutive years? After being buried for (I'm guessing) at lest 50 years or so the grease fitting balls still depress and have grease in them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Saxton Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 One of my friends up in the Strezlekies about 10 miles away as the the birds fly, has a 1914 Baby Grand Chevrolet beautifully restored. That chassis frame he says would be most likely 1925, which is the only one that has a cast iron crossmember for mounting the front of the engine. Bob says the 1914 - 15 -16 had semi- elliptic front springs, and 3/4 elliptic at the back. Next the 490 model had splayed quarter elliptic spring s, which gave the cars their own handling characteristics, which most people liked little . !925 chassis were as pictured. Most of the early Chev 4s had their own peculiar variation of crankshaft oiling . Obviously it was intended to be an improvement on the "faith and hope" that enough oil splash would find its way in the drill hole at the top of the main bearings. We found some thin enough flat felt sheet. Bob sliced narrow strips and plaited them, so he could push the top end into the oil hole on top of each main bearing. The oil spray would saturate the plaited felt wick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R Walling Posted July 20, 2018 Share Posted July 20, 2018 (edited) Whatever it is, I'm fairly confident it ran when parked, It'll will buff out! Edited July 20, 2018 by Roger Walling (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now