58L-Y8

Hi AJ I copied these photos of a 1929 J8-90 seven passenger sedan offered on eBay a few years ago. Presumably it was their factory sedan body, the maker wasn't identified. Someone should have photos of the Brunn convertible Victoria bodied J8-90 that has been featured in various articles including Special Interest Autos magazine at one time. Steve

They might be for the early 1920's Packard Sixes 1922-25, photo could have been taken in the Pullman body plant in Chicago. Pullman, the Sleeping Car company, had an auto body making operation, Packard contracted with them to supply bodies in those years.

1928 Dodge Victory Six

Hello Trini This is the point where you "Ask the man who owns one" or more specifically, the men who own, work on, and have the most honest, unvarnished opinions, to be found on these forums: http://www.packardclub.org/forum/ http://packardinfo.com/xoops/html/modules/newbb/ The subject of the 110/Sixes and 120/Eights as collector cars, their problems and benefits have been discussed many times on each; searching a little should turn up those threads. While there is some truth to parts for Senior series Eights, Super Eights and Twelves being costly relative to the Junior series 110 and 120, the latter were equally fine quality cars built to a price, much as were comparable Buicks and Chryslers. If you should purchase that 110, it would be surprising if you found it any more costly to restore and maintain than any other comparable pre-war car. Good luck, hope you'll choose Packard as your collector car. Steve

The hood, windshield frame and rear bumper are '47-'50 Kaiser. Its one of those sport customs from the mid-to-late 1950's built from readily available sedans by those long on skill, short on money. It really should be restored.

What coachbuilder created that handsome cabriolet body?

The real problem these hyped auctions leave for younger, inexperienced viewers is not only an unrealistic view of collector car valuations but also that if one can't afford one of a selected group of highly sought, potentially high value, greatly popular collector cars, there is no point in acquiring something more ordinary and affordable to preserve and enjoy. Suggesting to a young person that because a highly desired whatever is well out of financial reach that they should turn their attention to one of the many available four door models of the era is likely to elicit a shrug. The shame of that is the experience of collector car learning and enjoyment is missed, perhaps even the car is lost without a next conservator to prevent that.

Hi CBoz By the time your '38 LeBaron was built, call it late custom body era, Briggs/LeBaron was pretty relaxed about how much of the total content was added in whose plant. Edsel Ford was one of their best customers, if he wanted the finish and trim in his Lincoln plant to keep it busy with that work, no doubt Briggs/LeBaron was happy to comply. Every year as they watched the diminishing demand for the large cars we call 'Classics" unfold, many adjustment in the way they did business had to be made to serve a shrinking market. Steve

Hi A.J. Yes, those V-windshield Individual Custom Dietrich bodies were coming from the plant Murray operated for its Dietrich coach-building arm, likely the same one that built the body for your Royale and the three other Packard 845 sport sedans and the eight sport sedan bodies as pictured on the '32 Lincoln KB shown above. Bodies such as the sedans and victoria coupe on the Lincoln KA and REO Royale were built in the regular Murray production body plants. The level of handwork wouldn't have been as great, more general production stamping and assembling. This takes nothing away from these cars, they were built with a very high level of quality. Hugo Pfau, who apprenticed with LeBaron, wrote that at times, to keep the custom coach-building operations busy during slow times, body shells would be built, finished in primer paint and shipped to the carmaker to finish the color coats and interior trim. It was referred to as "bodies in the white". He noted that for their LeBaron operation, they would only attach their "LeBaron" coach-builder tag if they had done the complete building, trimming and finishing of the body to their standards. When Marmon came to Briggs to build bodies for the Sixteen but looking for favorable unit prices, the work was done in the underutilized LeBaron shops "in the white" then shipped to Marmon's Indianapolis plant for painting and interior trimming. Thus, no "LeBaron" tags were affixed though structurally the body was a LeBaron product. Steve

Hi A.J. By the mid-1920's, mass production body suppliers such as Fisher, Briggs and Murray had noticed the lucrative business that had been developed by small custom body firms and each set about acquiring or developing their own in-house custom body division. Fisher was fully bought out by GM in 1926, concurrently had acquired control of Fleetwood Metal Body Company. Not to be outdone by a major competitor, Murrray created Dietrich, Inc., quoting from A Century of Automotive Style, 100 Years of American Car Design, by Michael Lamm and Dave Holls, page 52: "Fast forward now to Feb. 1925. After selling his interest in LeBaron to Ralph Roberts and leaving New York, Dietrich arrived in Detroit as a 50% partner in Dietrich Inc. The other half was owned by Murray Corp. of America. Murray, as mentioned, was a major body supplier to Lincoln, Ford, Reo, Hupmobile, Hudson and others." Last to acquire an in-house coach-building arm was Briggs after Walter Briggs approach LeBaron's owner Ralph Roberts et al with a deal in 1927, completed by 1930 when the last remnant of original NYC office closed. In each case, the parent, production body company set up the custom operation with a separate plant solely for low-volume series and full-custom coach-building. Custom coachwork was very profitable in the late 1920's but became a serious financial drain with the onset of the Great Depression. Each folded the coach-building business into the production operations to a greater or lesser degree as those difficult years wore on. As body building methods evolved from the metal-over-wood composite construction to all-steel by 1940, with its attendant higher cost tool and die-work and necessary higher production volumes to amortize those costs, coach-building operations largely became building lengthened versions or customizing production body shells. Within all this time, in which plants and how much can be identified as full, partial or minor custom coachbuilding is very hard to quantify. The parent companies generally supported the coachbuilding operations with functional work such as castings, forgings, plating, any basic craft operations that would be prohibitively costly to set up on a low-volume basis. It would be safe to say that any body with the "Dietrich, Inc." tag came from a plant Murray dedicated to that work. It would reflect the greater handcrafting and low-volume methods necessary to produce a body of the expected quality, though it might still contain content shared with volume production bodies. As even mid'30's production convertible sedans for were generally built in an off-the-main production line operation, like the 120 models, Murray may have felt justified applying the "Dietrich" tags. Steve

Hi A.J. It is a murky period in Murray/Dietrich history. The "Dietrich" nameplate had become a marketing vehicle to lend cache by then, absent the man himself creating the designs. de Sakhnoffsky's contribution seems have been applying the full-length, over-the-cowl hood then coming into vogue, as Briggs/LeBaron was doing for their customers. Those "Dietrich" tagged cars after his departure were the company utilizing his fine design-work to sell whatever series customs and the occasional full-custom bodies they could. Remember, in the end, they even stuck "Dietrich" tags onto the Packard 120 convertible sedans. My conclusion about that is someone found a box of unused "Dietrich" body tags on a shelf, convinced sales management it would be good for the sale of those expensive models to have a bit of 'custom-body designer' cache added. Steve

Hi West Does anyone know what date during 1931 Ray Dietrich left after the final set to with Clarence Avery? Most histories report it was during 1932 at the NYAC that Walter Chrysler offered him a position as body design consultant. Certainly Ray left dozens of sketches and developed design work that Murray lunched off for another three years plus. Amos Northup knew well not to heavily rework those as he knew quality work. He must have been mostly occupied with production car projects at the time. Chrysler body engineering mostly frustrated Dietrich and wasted his talents, and frankly their cars suffered for it. Too bad WPC didn't back up Dietrich like Alfred Sloan did for Misterl and Edsel Ford did for E.T. Gregorie. Steve

I'm not surprised A.J. would appreciate the most elegantly-styled sport sedan of all KB Lincolns! The Model 240 Sport Berline by Dietrich, of which only eight were built, was the one that got away from Packard. Look closely at the lower body and you'll see its the same as the Packard V-windshield Individual Custom Dietrich bodies. The victoria-coupe style rear bustle wasn't seen on Packards, though should have been. Best part is they retained the convertible-style half-door, thin chrome window frames lending a lightness not even seen on the Car of the Dome. The flat windshield was probably done simply to differentiate the style from the Packards. With its metal roof and lower convertible body structure, if the B-pillar was removable, it would be a nascent four door hardtop decades before they came to the general market. Of the KA Lincoln Victoria coupe, both it and the REO Royale being Murray bodies, they benefitted from the fine aesthetic touch of both Amos Northup and Ray Dietrich. Ray Dietrich was certainly still with the company when these were being developed, would have had much input in their designs. Steve

Perhaps someone could take the '41 coupe in posting #13 and with sections from another coupe, create a credible closed-coupled four door sport sedan like the one rendered by Ross Cousins for Bob Gregorie and Edsel Ford.

Like it or not, its a transnational auto business and market now. Most buyers could care less where their new car is built as long as they can afford to buy it, its has the expected assembly quality and it returns reliable, generally trouble-free service. Country of origin is of no consequence to them. My only beef with Buick is they spring these slick concepts on us, like this Avista and last year's Avenir......then never bring them to market! Note to Buick "If it looks good, it is good, just build it!"

Hi GarryM Your description sounds somewhat like the 1930 Lincoln L Sport Roadster Model 191 by Locke. It has the disappearing top but not the third door rumble seat entrance. Refer to page 186 of The Classic Era by Beverly Rae Kimes. The Model 191 was scaled for the 136" wheelbase of the 1930 Model L, was design rendered for the 1931 Model K 145" wheelbase though doubts are any were actually built. Of the cars cited with the third door for the rumble seat, the 1929 Chrysler Imperial Model L-80 Roadster by Locke is pictured on page 136; the 1930 Rolls-Royce Phantom I York Roadster by Brewster on page 143 of the same book. The Derham convertible coupe pictured on Stutz including a photo with the door highlighted can be found on page 263 of The Splendid Stutz by Katzell. Although long wheelbase roadsters are the very extravagant embodiment of the 1920's ethos, the proportions aren't always that aesthetically satisfying. My personal opinion, the greatest benefit of a 145" wheelbase chassis as blank canvas is the rare chance to recreate one of the full-custom designs lost to history. The one that comes immediately to mind is pictured on page 262 of The Splendid Stutz by Katzell, captioned a "1930 five passenger Coupe by Generaux. A profile view is found on page 72 of The Golden Age Of The Luxury Car by Edited by George Hildebrand. The description is "A faux cabriolet by Etablissement Generaux of Brussels" Though essentially a victoria coupe, a recreation of this design could be built as a quarter window convertible victoria, stunning either way. Whatever body style you decide will be a welcome addition of one more Stutz MB restored to its original magnificence. My two cents, for what its worth. Steve

Hi Noting this 1933 Continental Ace sedan currently on eBay: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Other-Makes-/161920185899?forcerrptr=true&hash=item25b331f62b:g:~ikAAOSwk1JWcYj8&item=161920185899 How many Aces are now accounted for? In the 1977 Special Interest Autos article, they wrote only two were. One being offered by a collector car dealer is sort of restored, are any of the surviving Aces correctly restored? Were the Hayes bodies shared with any other carmaker? The styling seems to be current with its times, looks familiar, most similar to the concurrent Essex-Terraplane, though without the split windshield. Steve

Hi Even in thirty years of attending Hershey, which is never a disappointment, there are certain makes and/or models I have never encountered restored or well-preserved there but would like to see. Here's a couple that come to mind, add those you've got on your bucket-list. 1934 Hupmobile 417W sedan or coupe 1933 Continental Beacon, Flyer or Ace, any style 1929 Graham-Paige 629 1936 REO Flying Cloud Perhaps I just missed these if they were ever there. Your would-like-to-see list? Steve

In my father's black with white top 1963 Ford Galaxie 500 four door hardtop, the nicest car my folks had up to that point.

At Hershey a while ago, came upon remnants of what turned out to be a 1934 Hupmobile 417W coupe. Both it and the sedan share most of the Murray body with the concurrent Ford but with different details and features. The rear of the sedan body is different from Ford bodies, the coupe has half-door construction with convertible-style chrome-framed windows. Does anyone know how few were built?

Paul - You've nailed it, the '41 Cadillac "The Duchess" is exactly the configuration and content Pierce-Arrows should have been from the mid-'30's on. The '41 Packard 180 LeBaron Sport Brougham was also the correct configuration for their would-have-been late pre-war cars. Bringing that in for $3,000 possibly was in their capability.....well, maybe not quite as lavishly in accoutrements as "The Duchess". It must have caused no small amount of consternation during 1936-37 in the P-A front offices while they watched the excitement and, what would have been for them, good sales volume generated by "that upstart fwd Cord!". Rather than grouse about people spending good money on a car with no reputation, ordinary build quality, unproven mechanicals by a shaky company, they should have analyzed its appeal then quickly set about creating their own 1937 version to grab a piece of that market. Standing pat for the 1937 car lines sure didn't work, nor did diversion into travel trailers. When those first streamlined explorations took place in 1933-34, the fastback, so unlike the undercut shape of sedans up to that point, were the very soul of modernity. Through integrated, their trunks were limited by the sweeping shape, didn't fully affording the function expected. As the trunk and its rack hanging off the rear was replaced with a crudely-appended bustle trunk, it fulfilled the function without a pleasing form. The '36 close-coupled club sedan and large bustle-like trunk was a nascent 3-box sedan, waiting to be integrated and refined. If their designers could have conceived the vision, drew inspiration from the Cord, presented the concept to management, who then ran with it for 1937, it well could have been the beginings of their revival. Had they been able to conceive of it thin, chromed window frames, it could have a real knockout.

Thanks Ed for your assessment of both engines from considerable personal experience, something most of us lack. To what engineering features and details of the Pierce-Arrow twelve engine do you attribute the more robust character? Bore/stroke ratio? Bearing surface size? Oiling and cooling system design? Metallurgy?

If you can find a motor number stamped on a surface, it will be much easier to identify what models and years Chandler used that engine. Chandler had at least three different sixes with a further displacement variations on two in its last five years. The largest was a 288.6 ci in the Models 32, 33, 35, 1924-26 respectively, 1927-28 Big Six, and '29 Big Six enlarged to 331 ci. It was 3.50" X 5.00", long stroke unit. In those Depression years when recycling useful items was a necessity, a low-revving, long-stroke engines with transmission sourced from large, cheap used cars to power a sawmill or pump was common. Most like that was why that unit was saved and re-purposed.

Paul, Thanks for the kudos for my bridging strategy, something had to stem the freefall to create the situation that would allow the cars you've described and designed. They looks magnificent, what a shame no one had the vision as the time! "What we don’t know is whether a fourth category - expensive fine cars with excellent craftsmanship, new-school engineering and advanced styling (such as the proposed Pierce-Arrow) would have sold well. We can't know because none ever existed." At $3,000 and above, nothing was ever created specifically that would fulfill all those qualities described in one car. From their lack of action in that direction, one can infur the Pierce-Arrow management hadn't the vision or imagination to create such a car from the time they took over control from Studebaker. But, not to indict them too harshly, neither did any of the principals of the relatively financially healthier luxury car makers either. Packard would have been the most like candid to try, but the mindset had changed: if it wasn't mass-production, it wasn't worth the expense or bother. With Pierce-Arrow and ACD defunct, Packard settled for the few coachbuilt semi-custom formal styles and Darrrin customs to serve whatever demand arose. Cadillac, after the flathead Sixteen died, contented itself with a few Fleetwood formals on the 75, allowed a handful of cars to Derham and Bohman & Schwartz. Edsel Ford kept Brunn building Zephyr-chassis town cars for family and associates; the Continental really his preferred project. The '41-'42 Lincoln Custom lwb cars seem an almost an afterthought, created to hold onto the few K owners loyal to Lincoln. The Chrysler Crown Imperial was a pale effort, though Derham based a few worthwhile efforts on that late pre-war chassis.

Even the highest quality car that was out of step with what the market wanted in size, features and price as well as the tenor of the times would fail, which was exactly what befell the late-years Pierce-Arrow, and its peers, the Lincoln K V-12, Packard Twelve, and Cadillac Twelve and Sixteen. At the close of Lincoln K production, Edsel Ford said it wasn't that "We stopped producing fine cars, just that people stopped buying them" If those who still could afford such a car felt ill-at-ease driving one, it didn't matter how well they were crafted. Perceptions of quality are an ever-changing target in the auto business, relative to everything else available. Pierce was still a profitmaking enterprise just like any other car company, and the primary management charge was to run the company with that as their main objective. My prior comments regarding the 1932-33 product developments for 1934 should have been prefaced with the proviso that a very narrow window of opportunity existed to grab public attention and generate sufficient sales to fend off the mid-1934 receivership and eventual bankruptcy in August of that year. Intended to avoid that situation, the $1,900-$2,000 model described would still have had a high degree of quality engineering and construction. What they built ultimately wasn't profitable for the reasons stated above, were exercises in futility. To decide that in the distressed economy and rapidly changing tenor of those depression years that a degree of production component sharing was somehow anathema to their quality standards and a guarantee of an inferior product, when the unchanged path they followed lead to demise is to misunderstand the bigger picture. Simply put, they didn't have the luxury of continuing as they always had in the face of economic and industry trends, engineering and styling progress. And as important, changing social outlook that came to despise the class who were blamed for bringing the Depression on and trapping of their continued insulation from that distress i.e. expensive ultra-luxury cars. Many a once long-time Pierce-Arrow family understood the situation, chose an egalitarian car as cover for their transportation. No amount of quality craftsmanship could change that view. Packard 120's, Lincoln Zephyrs, LaSalles and Cadillac Series 60 while above the mass-market offerings in price and features, weren't preceived to be so far above or as haughty as were their last grandiose luxury cars. Could management have brought themselves to develop and field an owner-driven, $2,000 premium sedan of modern, Silver-Arrow-inspired styling based on production components shared with Studebaker President? If it meant corporate survival?