Jump to content

1959 king midget - $5,000


Recommended Posts

Think how many you could fit in your garage! This price might not be all that far out of line......

https://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/cto/d/san-francisco-king-midget/7705014680.html

email:  d4c92d02ce1a32d2ab8c1101fbdab3f9@sale.craigslist.org

image.png.4bfe70a19a8a19108f293d919da189af.pngimage.png.7d7f420e7e017c76e3a763180b770033.pngimage.png.c1a62563b34c977b19b95fa9132b95b0.pngimage.png.cc4348dce322e7d1471f7fb6ec6f5b54.pngimage.png.0e41c44cd504cfe2d3daeb4a32e20771.pngimage.png.727714321dc82d3ae240844a564f5473.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gearheadengineer said:

I’ve never seen one with an 8-track before! 

And a Continental kit! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember that these were offered as an alternative to a normal car. I suppose that they were street legal at the time in most, if not all states?  Would these be street legal now? They are more like a modern golf cart than a quad, quads are quite large and powerful now, but most states won't license them for street use. Not that I'd like to be mixing it up with that thing among all the big trucks and SUVs on the street today.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Rivguy said:

I remember that these were offered as an alternative to a normal car. I suppose that they were street legal at the time in most, if not all states?  Would these be street legal now? They are more like a modern golf cart than a quad, quads are quite large and powerful now, but most states won't license them for street use. Not that I'd like to be mixing it up with that thing among all the big trucks and SUVs on the street today.

 

I believe that if something was street legal when new (these were) then they are grandfathered in to being steet legal now.   No more dangerous than a motorcycle.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Alsancle said, would be legal today as they were legal when new. Make sure you get the original title documents. I would hate to have to convince the DMV I didn't make it in my home garage lol. You could have a lot of fun on suburban streets, running errands, or going for drives on quiet country roads. But you would have to be nutz to take one on the interstate or in heavy traffic. But, when they were new, a few people took them on cross country trips .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Rusty_OToole said:

As Alsancle said, would be legal today as they were legal when new. Make sure you get the original title documents. I would hate to have to convince the DMV I didn't make it in my home garage lol. You could have a lot of fun on suburban streets, running errands, or going for drives on quiet country roads. But you would have to be nutz to take one on the interstate or in heavy traffic. But, when they were new, a few people took them on cross country trips .

 

Most states have a horsepower lower limit that these with their original engine may not meet for use on interstates or other designated freeways. Even some smaller motorcycles are not allowed on freeways in many states. Honda along about 1970 altered their small motorcycle lineup because a certain model had a rated horsepower that barely qualified for California freeways. The problem was that actual dynamometer tests showed a significant percentage of that model were slightly short of the legal requirement, and California contended that the requirement was for actual horsepower and not stated ratings. 

I remember this because one of my cousins got caught in that model trap. His was tested (independently), and found barely shy of the requirement. A year later he had a 1966 Mustang.

 

I don't recall what the legally required horsepower was at that time. But I find myself wondering if the King Midget might have met the requirement for the horsepower of not?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wayne sheldon said:

 

Most states have a horsepower lower limit that these with their original engine may not meet for use on interstates or other designated freeways. Even some smaller motorcycles are not allowed on freeways in many states. Honda along about 1970 altered their small motorcycle lineup because a certain model had a rated horsepower that barely qualified for California freeways. The problem was that actual dynamometer tests showed a significant percentage of that model were slightly short of the legal requirement, and California contended that the requirement was for actual horsepower and not stated ratings. 

I remember this because one of my cousins got caught in that model trap. His was tested (independently), and found barely shy of the requirement. A year later he had a 1966 Mustang.

 

I don't recall what the legally required horsepower was at that time. But I find myself wondering if the King Midget might have met the requirement for the horsepower of not?

 

Anyone that takes that on a freeway is a complete idiot. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, alsancle said:

Anyone that takes that on a freeway is a complete idiot. 

Yes folks.  Those who don’t know, a King Midget uses a single cylinder engine driving a single rear wheel!  (No differential needed). 

It has a belt drive centrifugal clutch.  Operational and top speed put it in the Model T class.  
 

Forget about “legal” In reality it’s barely a car. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was an old boy around here in the seventies that thought these were the bomb.

He had a couple of them. He even made an extension on the back of his travel trailer for one.

I saw him driving them around town often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, m-mman said:

Yes folks.  Those who don’t know, a King Midget uses a single cylinder engine driving a single rear wheel!  (No differential needed). 

It has a belt drive centrifugal clutch.  Operational and top speed put it in the Model T class.  
 

Forget about “legal” In reality it’s barely a car. 

 

Even as a 13 year old I was an elitist.  I would not bother with a Go-kart that didn't have a live rear axle.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After I got my license, I got a Honda 160cc motorcycle. It was freeway legal, barely. I believe that it had a 16.5 hp. rating from the manufacturer. In California, it legally qualified as a motorcycle, not a motor driven cycle. In actuality, it had a 70-75 mph. top speed and could maintain 60-65 mph. It was not really suitable for long distance freeway travel, but I could take short freeway hops to connect my back road/ county highway travels. 

I never suggested that a King Midget could be used on a freeway. I just wondered if they have brake and headlights. I know that very old antique cars can be operated on public highways and streets. Prior to getting my 160 I rode a Honda 50 for a time. Although street legal, it wasn't ideal for the surface street conditions of my neighborhood and surrounding area. I think that it would be a similar situation with the King Midget. I think that it might be fun under the right conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The King has 4 wheel hydraulic drum brakes and tractor headlights. It is street legal, and a lot of people find them a fun hobby. When they were new some owners had them as their only car, mainly using them for local shopping and errands while others had them as a second car for the family.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...