trimacar Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 I’ve loved my 3/4 ton Suburban, 8.1, great tow vehicle. It’s at 150K miles, considered “low” mileage for such a vehicle. I thought it was my forever tow vehicle, but… Just lucked into the identical vehicle, 2002, with under 100k miles. In the near future, the 2001 will be for sale. Look up “book” value, and add a 50-100%! It amazed me… Period reviews of the 8.1 state “it could tow small planets”. Yep. Buy horsepower, drive torque, and few engines have the torque curve of the 8.1. Those who know, know, these are unicorns, second biggest engine ever put in a GM car and only available 2001-2006. 2001 on left. Gotta love General Motors. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Peterson Posted August 31 Share Posted August 31 Got two of them as well... well, sort of. 2002 GMC 2500HD longbed pickup with the 8.1, and 2003 Avalanche with the 8.1. I prefer the 2002 because it has the Allison transmission. For some reason the Avalanche doesn't have it. How about your suburbans? Allison? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
39BuickEight Posted August 31 Share Posted August 31 (edited) The 8.1 Suburban, Yukon XL’s and Avalanche’s could not be had with the Allison transmission. They got the 4L-85E, a slightly beefed up version of the 4L-80E that was behind the 6.0. The Suburban and Avalanche floors were not tall enough to accommodate the Allison. Edited August 31 by 39BuickEight (see edit history) 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarNucopia Posted August 31 Share Posted August 31 I've also got an 8.1 in my 2006 Chevy 2500HD. I think this was the only year it was mated with it the 6-speed Allison transmission. The truck is a beast, but a thirsty one. As the saying goes, "it'll pass anything on the road,...but a gas station". The only downside is the 26 gallon gas tank give me range anxiety when I'm towing. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Roth Posted August 31 Share Posted August 31 2 hours ago, 39BuickEight said: The 8.1 Suburban, Yukon XL’s and Avalanche’s could not be had with the Allison transmission. They got the 4L-85E, a slightly beefed up version of the 4L-80E that was behind the 6.0. The Suburban and Avalanche floors were not tall enough to accommodate the Allison. Yes, Joe Vicini (Past AACA Pres and GM Engines expert) told me the same thing. I wanted my new Suburban with Duramax diesel and Allison transmission. Joe advised me to wait rather than buy in 2000 and 2001, but when the 2002 models were released he told me the Suburban/Avalanche floorpan would not permit the Duramax/Allison - and just go ahead with the 2500 ande 8.1L. We have the 2500 Series 2002 Suburban 8.1L with nearly 200,xxx miles, and also the 2500 Series 2006 Avalanche 8.1L 4-WD also with nearly 200,xxx miles They both tow great, and there is no replacement for displacement ... but our 2000 Excursion 7.3L Turbo Diesel 4-WD is even better, at least in my opinion, and is approaching 400,xxx miles, mostly towing my 30 ft long, 12 ft tall hauler with Cadillac, Packard, Buick inside 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trimacar Posted August 31 Author Share Posted August 31 10 hours ago, West Peterson said: How about your suburbans? Allison? Well, the question's been answered above, nope! Nice pair of vehicles, West. I don't plan on keeping the 2001, it will be for sale in the near future. Thanks dc 8 hours ago, CarNucopia said: The truck is a beast, but a thirsty one Yes, one doesn't buy an 8.1 for fuel economy. Mine have the 38 gallon gas tanks, so that hurts at the pump but helps on the road. That engine was still built for a few years after 2006, not available in trucks or Suburbans though, think they used them for motor homes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Peterson Posted August 31 Share Posted August 31 10 hours ago, CarNucopia said: I've also got an 8.1 in my 2006 Chevy 2500HD. I think this was the only year it was mated with it the 6-speed Allison transmission. The truck is a beast, but a thirsty one. No, as stated above, it's in my 2002 GMC 2500 HD. 2006 may have been the last year (for a while, anyway), but certainly not the only year. Also, for the size of the engine, the gas mileage is relatively good. Actually better than the 454 Chevrolets we used to tow with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarNucopia Posted August 31 Share Posted August 31 1 hour ago, West Peterson said: No, as stated above, it's in my 2002 GMC 2500 HD. 2006 may have been the last year (for a while, anyway), but certainly not the only year. Also, for the size of the engine, the gas mileage is relatively good. Actually better than the 454 Chevrolets we used to tow with. I’m pretty sure yours is a 5-speed Allison. 2006 has a 6-speed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Peterson Posted September 1 Share Posted September 1 I guess I thought they were all the same. I stand corrected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trimacar Posted September 1 Author Share Posted September 1 6 hours ago, West Peterson said: I guess I thought they were all the same. I stand corrected. I didnt know either, wouldn’t feel bad if I were you. I’ve always paid attention to engine size only! The 2002 is my fifth suburban, 1-3 had the 454. The 2001 has apparently been sold to a forum member, thanks! His personal inspection will confirm deal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarNucopia Posted September 1 Share Posted September 1 (edited) 2 hours ago, trimacar said: The 2001 has apparently been sold to a forum member, thanks! His personal inspection will confirm deal. Congrats on the sale. This generation of GM truck seems to have gained in value in the last few years. I'm sure part of it is the supply issue and high prices of new trucks. But beyond this, I think these are the peak of analog trucks before complications like displacement-on-demand and more computer systems. If you read the comments on Bring a Trailer when one is up for auction, there's a lot of love for them. The pre-DEF diesels seem particularly desirable. This reminds me of something I read a while ago that farmers were opting for older tractors instead of buying new because of the simplicity of repairs. To clarify, my issue isn't the MPG, its the gas tank size. Edited September 1 by CarNucopia (see edit history) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trimacar Posted September 1 Author Share Posted September 1 Yes, when I bought my 2001, it was priced about 30% over “book value”, but was in perfect shape with 37k miles. I was trying to use book value for 8.1 3/4 ton while dickering with sales manager, he said “Buddy, there IS no book on these trucks”. As said, great tow vehicles, and unicorns to find a good one these days. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmTee Posted September 10 Share Posted September 10 Glad to be the new owner of this one! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuickTom87 Posted September 10 Share Posted September 10 Just got done putting air bags to prevent sagging for my rear and extra leaf springs and transmission cooler for my tow rig . looking to tow more this spring summer . I wanted to bring my car to Hershey but next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trimacar Posted September 10 Author Share Posted September 10 3 hours ago, EmTee said: Glad to be the new owner of this one! Wow, that sure looks familiar! Oh, wait….. Glad it went to a good home. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bills Auto Works Posted September 10 Share Posted September 10 (edited) The 8.1 is a good engine & will provided great reliability for hundreds of thousands of miles! However in my case being a transporter who gets paid by the loaded mile....I could never use one. My two Duramax diesels (3500 Chevy & 2500HD GMC) get basically twice the fuel mileage of the 8.1 pulling my trailers & will outlast & out pull the 8.1 easily. They both currently have over 600k each on the original engines & transmissions. They both use less than a quart of oil per 10k miles & are only used with trailers attached. God Bless Bill https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/nationwide-single-car-transport-hauling-open-or-enclosed.614419/ Edited September 10 by Bills Auto Works (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Peterson Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 On 8/30/2023 at 11:01 PM, CarNucopia said: The only downside is the 26 gallon gas tank give me range anxiety when I'm towing. Perhaps the short-box came with a smaller tank, or the newer models came with a smaller tank??? I believe the tanks in both my Avalanche and the long-bed are both over 30 gallons. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmTee Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 From Edmunds for the 2001 Suburban 2500: I calculated 15.3 mpg on my trip from VA to NY at mostly 65 mph. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlier Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 22 hours ago, BuickTom87 said: Just got done putting air bags to prevent sagging for my rear and extra leaf springs and transmission cooler for my tow rig . looking to tow more this spring summer . I wanted to bring my car to Hershey but next year. Nice looking Tundra you have there. I have an 2012 Tundra. In case you are not aware, the 2nd generation Tundra has a weight carrying hitch limit of 500 lbs and trailer weight limit of 5000 lbs. In order to attain the Tundra's maximum hitch and trailer limits (approximately 1000 lbs on the hitch and 10,000 lb trailer weight, a weight distributing hitch is required per Toyota. I use a weight distributing hitch with sway control on my Tundra when towing my loaded, enclosed, car trailer (about 6,000 lbs). Never have a problem with sagging or swaying. No airbags or extra springs necessary for me when towing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuickTom87 Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 Yeah I swapped that out also , running air bags for the rear to prevent sagging as well as added an extra leaf spring . I just did it for piece of mind . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarNucopia Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 5 hours ago, West Peterson said: Perhaps the short-box came with a smaller tank, or the newer models came with a smaller tank??? I believe the tanks in both my Avalanche and the long-bed are both over 30 gallons. Interesting. I need to get under mine to see if the tank size is due to space constraints. I’d be a happy guy if I could gain another 5 gallons with a swap. 5 hours ago, EmTee said: From Edmunds for the 2001 Suburban 2500: I calculated 15.3 mpg on my trip from VA to NY at mostly 65 mph. I couldn’t find the EPA rating for my ‘06. I’d bet the aerodynamics of a Suburban are far better then my truck and account for the 3MPG improvement you have on the highway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Roth Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 20 hours ago, Bills Auto Works said: The 8.1 is a good engine & will provided great reliability for hundreds of thousands of miles! However in my case being a transporter who gets paid by the loaded mile....I could never use one. My two Duramax diesels (3500 Chevy & 2500HD GMC) get basically twice the fuel mileage of the 8.1 pulling my trailers & will outlast & out pull the 8.1 easily. They both currently have over 600k each on the original engines & transmissions. They both use less than a quart of oil per 10k miles & are only used with trailers attached. God Bless Bill https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/nationwide-single-car-transport-hauling-open-or-enclosed.614419/ From 2000 until 2002 I had hoped the 2500 Suburban would eventually be available with the Dura-Max Diesel and the Allison transmission, as suggested by former GM Engines and AACA National President Joe Vicini. In October, 2001 Joe called me and let me know the floor pan of the Suburban would not be revised to accept that driveline, and to just go ahead with the 8.1L gas engine. It is a fine unit, now with nearly 200,000 miles and no needed repairs (Same configuration in our 2005 2500 Avalanche), but neither have the towing ease of our 400,xxx mile 2000 Excursion 7.3L Diesel. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert G. Smits Posted September 11 Share Posted September 11 1 hour ago, Marty Roth said: neither have the towing ease of our 400,xxx mile 2000 Excursion 7.3L Diesel. My 2001 Excursion 7.3 was a great tow vehicle but couldn't touch the 96 Dodge Cummins 12 valve that preceded it. Finally my bad left knee wouldn't tolerate the the Dodge standard transmission. In 2007 I upgraded to a Chevy Duramax/Allison which should be my last tow vehicle. For those of you towing with pick-up consider a 50-70 gal auxiliary fuel tank. Best towing money I ever spent. I used to tow with a friend using The 8.1. All of my diesels would smoke him on upgrades and at the gas station. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmTee Posted September 12 Share Posted September 12 What kind of mileage are people seeing when towing with the Duramax/Allison? A friend of mine mentioned 14 mpg, but I believe that's pulling an RV trailer of unknown (to me) size/weight. For the number of miles I'll be towing annually, I think the 8.1 will be fine for me; particularly as a first tow vehicle. My brother had an F350 crew cab dually with the 7.3 and manual transmission. He loved it and only sold it when he decided to go with a Class A motorhome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert G. Smits Posted September 14 Share Posted September 14 On 9/11/2023 at 7:24 PM, EmTee said: I think the 8.1 will be fine for me; You are going to love it. They are great tow vehicles. Just make sure you use a equalizer hitch. I think my mileage on the Duramax is around 10-12 towing a 30 ft. GN trailer. When I haul two cars with the 48 ft. it drops below 10. Mileage is so dependent on towing speed. After a while you get used to paying for 70-80 gal of Diesel each fuel stop. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmTee Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 21 hours ago, Robert G. Smits said: You are going to love it. Hope so -- just bought this today (2023 Pace American 8.5X24 Enclosed Car Hauler)... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now