Guest Steam6 Posted August 7, 2014 Share Posted August 7, 2014 (edited) Can someone identify this car? Any and every possible help is very much appreciated. Thanks. Edited August 8, 2014 by Steam6 (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Steam6 Posted August 7, 2014 Share Posted August 7, 2014 (edited) Sorry. Picture isn't working. I'll try to resolve the issue.*picture added* Edited August 8, 2014 by Steam6 (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mercer09 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 not much to go by, even when enlarging the photolooks to be from around 1934-convertible type top?-obviously set up for heavy snows............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Steam6 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 Here is a bit closer up of a photo where you can see the rear end a bit better, however, it's a bit blurry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhambulldog Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 it's a railroad inspection car. That's a cow catcher on the front. ..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Steam6 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 I know, it was an inspection car the West Side Lumber Company used, however, what I am wondering is what type of car it actually was converted from (WSLCo. had a number of other inspection cars that were converted from road cars, such as model a's, a model t, a 1939 pontiac, and this, of course). There is also a better picture of it at this website: http://ngdiscussion.net/phorum/read.php?1,132402,132412#msg-132412 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhambulldog Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 I Posted that before I was through writing. sorryOf course you know it's a RR inspection car.... sorry to be Captain Obvious.I think it's a 1925 LaSalle, with bobbed off front fenders and the headlights removed, it's hard to be sure..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhambulldog Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 Looking at your photo here,I'm less sure now than I was before.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhambulldog Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 Yes. I think it is a 1925 LaSallehere is another from the LaSalle site Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Steam6 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 Thank you very much, I've never heard of LaSalle before, so I wouldn't have came up with that answer (I'm more knowledgeable of trains than cars). Googling LaSalle, thats what it looks like to me too. Again, thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhambulldog Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 (edited) You're welcome.LaSalle was the 'companion' car to CadillacThe 'companion' to Buick was Marquette'Companion' to Oldsmobile was Knight.EDITCorrection, As John has pointed out VIKING was Oldsmobile's companionI like RR locomotives, too.I know a steam locomotive from a Diesel/electric locomotive.EditThe Viking was the Olds companion carThank you for that correction!! Edited August 9, 2014 by bhambulldog correction (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Steam6 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 So, was the only real difference of a Cadillac and a LaSalle the badging? Forgive me for my ignorance over the subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Mellor NJ Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 The first LaSalle was 1927. I don't think it's a LaSalle at all but I can't say what it is. I'm looking for a large sedan with big deep headlights and an inward curved rod coming down from the visor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rusty_OToole Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 LaSalle was a lower priced companion car to Cadillac. A completely different car, but shared some parts like a smaller, lower HP version of the Cadillac engine, transmission, and some other parts that didn't show.Sort of the way the same dealer sells Dodges and Chryslers today, which look different but share the same platform. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzcarnerd Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 (edited) I am fairly sure the car in post #8 is a 1928 Graham-Paige.The colour pic of the 'LaSalle' railroad car looks to have a hood and radiator from something else.The companion car to Oldsmobile was the Viking. Edited August 8, 2014 by nzcarnerd (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Steam6 Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 Looking up Graham-Paige, I find the attached picture of a 1929 Graham-Paige. It does have the right visor, however, it doesn't have the smaller lights on the fender you can see in post #8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlLaFong Posted August 8, 2014 Share Posted August 8, 2014 You're welcome.LaSalle was the 'companion' car to CadillacThe 'companion' to Buick was Marquette'Companion' to Oldsmobile was Knight.I like RR locomotives, too.I know a steam locomotive from a Diesel/electric locomotive.The Viking was the Olds companion car Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhambulldog Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 The Viking was the Olds companion carThanks for that correctionOf course Viking is correctWhat was Pontiac's companion?Or, was Pontiac a companion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bhambulldog Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 I am fairly sure the car in post #8 is a 1928 Graham-Paige.The colour pic of the 'LaSalle' railroad car looks to have a hood and radiator from something else.The companion car to Oldsmobile was the Viking.Thanks for that.When I saw that hood, I thought LaSalle .... (apparently incorrectly)and of course if it were LaSalle it would be '27 or later Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Mellor NJ Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 I commend NZcarnerd for the ID but in looking at 28s I don't see the curved bar under the visor. I think it's indeed a 29. Cowl lights might have been optional. It also has that angularity in the back of the roof like the subject picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Steam6 Posted August 9, 2014 Share Posted August 9, 2014 Thanks everyone. I also now believe its a 1929 Graham-Paige, due to the body lines, door hinge placements, visor brackets, and radiator. Again, thank you very much. The photo shows that there are no cowl lights, but there are some on the fenders. I believe West Side Lumber Company, or the previous owner, (when it was a road car, before the railroad conversion) may have moved them for some reason? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham Man Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 If we are talking about the original pictures on the top, it has to be 1929 Graham-Paige 615; the radiator was 1928-29 only, and the hood panels were 1929-1931, making the railroad car pictured on the top a 1929 Graham-Paige 615, to be specific, a Second Series Graham-Paige 615 (produced from about August 1928 to August 1929). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeC5 Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 That thing corners like it was on rails.... (someone had to say it).... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rusty_OToole Posted August 12, 2014 Share Posted August 12, 2014 Thanks for that correctionOf course Viking is correctWhat was Pontiac's companion?Or, was Pontiac a companion?Pontiac was companion to the Oakland. GM in the late 20s was expanding their line to include new lower priced companions for every car except Chevrolet, their lowest priced car. They dropped all the companion makes in the depression except for LaSalle which lasted until 1940. For some reason, Oakland kept the companion Pontiac and dropped the senior Oakland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R Walling Posted August 14, 2014 Share Posted August 14, 2014 Thank you very much, I've never heard of LaSalle before, so I wouldn't have came up with that answer (I'm more knowledgeable of trains than cars). Googling LaSalle, thats what it looks like to me too. Again, thank you. With you knoledge of trains, could you describe the braking action on steel wheel? I would asume that you would have to apply the brakes gently so that they don't lock up. I think that if I were to desigh a braking system I would have some type of shoe that would apply friction directly to the top of the track. Any comments on that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham Man Posted August 18, 2014 Share Posted August 18, 2014 Great question; if you look at the picture bulldog posted it looks like they have brake lining riveted to the wheels? Your comment would also would apply to acceleration. Interestingly Top Gear just did an episode where they used a Audi A8 to pull small railcars, but it was an all wheel drive car and had antilock breaks and traction control, it worked pretty well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now