Guest Jon Barker Posted April 4, 2014 Share Posted April 4, 2014 Hi, I'm trying to find out more about the history of my car and have noticed that there are some very clever people on here who appear to be able to decipher some of the numbers to be found on a Buick. I have listed three numbers that I have found which are as follows :Car Serial number (on a tag on the right rail behind the front wheel) - 3209272Motor number (the term used in the 37 handbook) - 6 3473 910Engine number(as above, from the handbook, found on the engine block) - GM 1297591-2Can anyone enlighten me as to what these numbers can tell me ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean1997 Posted April 5, 2014 Share Posted April 5, 2014 Frame serial number:3209272 = sequential number, range for 1937 was 2,999,497 to 3,219,843Is there a letter at the beginning of the frame serial number? (a C at the beginning of the frame serial number means the car was built at South Gate, CA; an L at the beginning of the frame serial number means the car was built at Linden, NJ; and no letter at the beginning of the frame serial number means the car was built at Flint, MI)Engine serial number:634739106 = Series 60 (Century)3473910 = sequential number, range for 1938 was 3,396,937 to 3,572,651The body tag on the cowl contains more information, so post that if you can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jon Barker Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 Frame serial number:3209272 = sequential number, range for 1937 was 2,999,497 to 3,219,843Is there a letter at the beginning of the frame serial number? (a C at the beginning of the frame serial number means the car was built at South Gate, CA; an L at the beginning of the frame serial number means the car was built at Linden, NJ; and no letter at the beginning of the frame serial number means the car was built at Flint, MI)Engine serial number:634739106 = Series 60 (Century)3473910 = sequential number, range for 1938 was 3,396,937 to 3,572,651The body tag on the cowl contains more information, so post that if you can.The frame serial number has the letters 'SER' preceding it but no actual letter in front of the number itself. Forgive my ignorance but can you give me a bit more info on where to locate the body tag ?I should have explained that I am researching this history because the car was sold to me as a McLaughlin Buick and I have always been suspicious that it was a USA built car converted to right hand drive. The guys in Canada have not recognised any of the numbers, and you have, so that confirms it. They also said to count the number of nuts on the wheels - 5 meaning USA and 6 meaning Canada - there are 5. I will send you the extra information as soon as I can. Thanks for you help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1939_Buick Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 (edited) Definitely not a Canadian built car. Going by '39's they have a different frame & engine number sequence. For '39 Canadian Buick’s have 922xxxxx frame & W4xxxx engine numbers. As a guess W = Walkerville Ontario. The body data plate is about 150 mm x 100 mm and above the (RHD) steering column on the firewall. Flint did build RHD cars & RHD components. Other RHD drive markets were Argentina (RHD at that time), India, New Zealand, Australia, Rhodesia & South Africa. In Australia locally designed & manufactured bodies were put imported frames. 1939 Flint/Fisher Buick’s assembled in New Zealand from components do not have a body data plate.There is a German guy in Christchurch, New Zealand who has a business exporting cars to UK & Europe. Very slight chance your car may be 1 of those. There are also private imports into UK. Due to the political-financial situation in South Africa exporting cars has been a way to get money out. Several ex RSA cars here in Australia/NZ Edited April 7, 2014 by 1939_buick formatting (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean1997 Posted April 7, 2014 Share Posted April 7, 2014 (edited) I've attached some pictures of US frame serial number plates and body tags from US and Canadian cars. As indicated, the body tag should be on the firewall under the hood. The frame serial number plate should not have the letters SER on it. It should have the Buick logo and then be followed by a C, L, or a 3. On LHD cars, the frame serial number plate is riveted to the side of the frame behind the front passenger side tire, don't know about RHD cars. Post pictures of both tags if you can.For 1935-1964 Canadian serial numbers, the first digit is the last digit of the model year (7 for 1937), the second digit is the division (4=Buick), the third digit is the car series (4=Series 40/Special, 6=Series 60/Century, ect.), the forth and fifth digits indicate the body style, and the remainder of the digits vary by model year and build plant but are a sequential number or the number of engine cylinders (1955-1957 only, and all 8 cylinder) and a sequential number. 1965-1966 are similar and 1967 and later use the same format as in the US. Edited April 7, 2014 by sean1997 (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jon Barker Posted April 8, 2014 Share Posted April 8, 2014 I searched around the car last night for any tag with the Buick logo but was unable to find anything. I attach some photos in the hope that it may help... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean1997 Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 In one of the pictures of the firewall you can see the rivets for the body tag, but the actual tag is missing. The frame serial number tag seems to have been redone. Perhaps all of that is related to the RHD conversion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
39BuickEight Posted April 9, 2014 Share Posted April 9, 2014 There is another serial number stamped into the actual frame, but it's practically impossible to see without some work. Unless I'm mistaken it's in the right rear area near the rear wheel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jon Barker Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 I had this reply from a Buick enthusiast who lives in England. I hope no one takes offence at some of the remarks, but it does seem to explain a lot about my car :"This is relatively good news for you as US wheels will fit yours and you have more chances in the US in finding some. ONLY the Century had these!Let me give you a little Buick history. Buick bought out McLaughlins factory in Oshawa for the very purpose of sending cars to Commonwealth county's and avoiding import tax'sThey built the standard small and large series cars there in right hand drive and only sedans for Africa. Aus and anywhere else that drove on the left. Generally speaking they built these cars from the rubbish that Flint no longer needed. When Buick produced a new model with new mechanics all the old stuff went up to Oshawa for them to carry on putting it in Commonwealth cars that they didnt really care about (We would put up with anything)Now we come to the complicated bit, as they were only building the small and big series sedans they still had to offer to the British the cars in the middle series and those with non sedan bodies. To get around the import duties whole cars were shipped up to Oshawa, converted to right hand drive, had some badges stuck on and sold around the Commonwealth.Yours is NOT a car converted afterwards but converted in Oshawa before sale. Centurys were not made there so this is what they had to do. Had it been built there it would have still had 35/6 running gear and six lug wheels with reverse threads." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean1997 Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 The car may have been converted to RHD at Oshawa, but I think the part about the Century not being built in Canada is incorrect because here are a few serial numbers of 1937 Century's built at:746110256746110509746190110746190161746190380746190414746190616746670313746671647These frame serial numbers use the standard GM of Canada format rather than the US format like your car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Grant Magrath Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 I had this reply from a Buick enthusiast who lives in England. I hope no one takes offence at some of the remarks, but it does seem to explain a lot about my car :"This is relatively good news for you as US wheels will fit yours and you have more chances in the US in finding some. ONLY the Century had these!Let me give you a little Buick history. Buick bought out McLaughlins factory in Oshawa for the very purpose of sending cars to Commonwealth county's and avoiding import tax'sThey built the standard small and large series cars there in right hand drive and only sedans for Africa. Aus and anywhere else that drove on the left. Generally speaking they built these cars from the rubbish that Flint no longer needed. When Buick produced a new model with new mechanics all the old stuff went up to Oshawa for them to carry on putting it in Commonwealth cars that they didnt really care about (We would put up with anything)Now we come to the complicated bit, as they were only building the small and big series sedans they still had to offer to the British the cars in the middle series and those with non sedan bodies. To get around the import duties whole cars were shipped up to Oshawa, converted to right hand drive, had some badges stuck on and sold around the Commonwealth.Yours is NOT a car converted afterwards but converted in Oshawa before sale. Centurys were not made there so this is what they had to do. Had it been built there it would have still had 35/6 running gear and six lug wheels with reverse threads."Wow! Great info Jon.Explains why our Canadian made, New Zealand assembled 1939 Chevrolets had heaps of 37-38 parts in them, not counting the local content percentage required by NZ law at the time.CheersGrant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1939_Buick Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 The car may have been converted to RHD at Oshawa, but I think the part about the Century not being built in Canada is incorrect because here are a few serial numbers of 1937 Century's built at:746110256< snip >I have doubts on the accuracy of this story. Agree the car in question was not built Canada or converted LHD/RHD in Canada. Conversion is a big task involving the steering, brakes, wiring, dash and very significantly the clutch/bell housing. The GM Flint parts books list RHD parts.I have inspected RHD Buick’s in Australia, New Zealand, England and Southern African. England has imported McLaughlin. For others they seem to use the Flint numbering system and 5 studs (not 6 studs). In some countries locally assembled. If the components were shipped via Canada to minimise taxes or if parts only direct from USA had lesser taxes in unknown. In general complete cars from non commonwealth had a higher import tax into Aust/NZ and probably South Africa. I know of 1 only 1930's McLaughlin Buick in NZ. None in Australia where, contrary to above, Buick’s local bodies were made and are different to Flint. In Australia Martin & King (and others?) built bodies for some senior series but some senior series were probably imported Carryover of some parts – engine to the next model year do doubt occurred in the local assembly operations.746110256. My decoding is 7=1937, 4611=model type as USA, 0256=guess this is a sequential serial number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleach Posted April 10, 2014 Share Posted April 10, 2014 I had this reply from a Buick enthusiast who lives in England. I hope no one takes offence at some of the remarks, but it does seem to explain a lot about my car :...They built the standard small and large series cars there in right hand drive and only sedans for Africa. Aus and anywhere else that drove on the left. Generally speaking they built these cars from the rubbish that Flint no longer needed. ...."I'd take Flint rubbish anytime over the Empire's Lucas poor excuse for electricals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean1997 Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Canadian law requires documentation be kept on all cars built or sold new in Canada, so you can get documentation from GM of Canada for a fee (production numbers only for 1939 and earlier):http://www.gm.ca/gm/english/shopping/parts/vintage Attached are some reference materials.1939-1942 Parts for GM of Canada Vehicles.pdf1928-1936 Canadian Data Book.pdf1937-1952 Sanford Evans Data Book.pdfCatalog of Canadian Car ID Numbers.pdfMBCC Accelerator March-April 1982 Volume 11 Issue 5.pdfMBCC Accelerator May-June 1985 Volume 14 Issue 6.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1939_Buick Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 I'd take Flint rubbish anytime over the Empire's Lucas poor excuse for electricals.All Buick's I have seen, no matter what country, have USA Delco (*) electrics: not the prince of darkness electric's.[ * = IIRC pre war Buicks made in Australia used Bosch electric wipers (not vacuum) ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jon Barker Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 Well I do seem to have rattled a few cages with that last post, although I claim no responsibility for it ! I'm certainly not suggesting any sense of superiority one way or the other. After all, I am a great Buick fan otherwise I wouldn't be here. However, I'm not too sure what conclusions I can draw from all the contributions so far - looks like my car is a Flint manufactured one. I have found the registration document and that states that the first date of registration was 13-08-1937 so I think the RHD conversion was definitely done prior to import here. I'll try the links to GM of Canada in case they can throw any more light on the matter. Thanks to all for the responses to date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1939_Buick Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 . I have found the registration document and that states that the first date of registration was 13-08-1937 so I think the RHD conversion was definitely done prior to import here..In my view your car (and 1000's of others) was made RHD from new and not converted. Converting a car LHD to RHD is a massive amount of work with many new RHD parts needed. Look at the clutch - pedal assembly. Was your car registered from new in UK? August is very late in the model year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleach Posted April 11, 2014 Share Posted April 11, 2014 All Buick's I have seen, no matter what country, have USA Delco (*) electrics: not the prince of darkness electric's.[ * = IIRC pre war Buicks made in Australia used Bosch electric wipers (not vacuum) ]I know that Delco was used in every GM product and even some non GM products. If what Flint makes is rubbish, what you would call Lucas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1939_Buick Posted April 12, 2014 Share Posted April 12, 2014 I know that Delco was used in every GM product and even some non GM products. If what Flint makes is rubbish, what you would call Lucas?:confused: :confused: :confused: Who is saying Flint makes rubbish? But on all the cars I have had with Lucas electrics (aka Prince of Darkness) never had any issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1937-44 Posted April 12, 2014 Share Posted April 12, 2014 Hi, This thread seems to be getting somewhat off topic. Lest it continues into a downhill slide I think the whole Flint rubbish began in post number 9 by an anonymous Buick fan in England reposted by Jon Barker. Neither Delco nor Lucas were mentioned. References to the Prince of Darkness was introduced later. Carl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jon Barker Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Hi, This thread seems to be getting somewhat off topic. Lest it continues into a downhill slide I think the whole Flint rubbish began in post number 9 by an anonymous Buick fan in England reposted by Jon Barker. Neither Delco nor Lucas were mentioned. References to the Prince of Darkness was introduced later. CarlThere is now a sad update to all this. The car has been taken to the Buick expert who posted the contentious note a while back. The car is definitely not Canadian and was not converted to RHD before it got here. It has been bodged in an almighty fashion e.g. there is some weird arrangement with the clutch which was not altered during conversion, the upholstery and interior generally are all wrong, the steering column isn't even a Buick column and the wiring is downright dangerous. It would cost me more than it is worth to get it put right. A salutory lesson to anyone like me who loves these cars but doesn't have any idea about them. I cannot sell the car as I couldn't lie to a prospective buyer as I was lied to. It will be scrapped on its return and that, I'm afraid, is the end of my association with old cars and with this site. Needless to say my savings are wiped out so there's no chance of getting another (and I wouldn't dare to). Thanks for all the help from people out there who, unlike me, know what they're talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1937-44 Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Hi Jon, THAT'S TERRIBLE. I'm very sorry to hear about the car being "bodged" up. I hope you don't rush to have the car scrapped out. I understand it is devastating to get that kind of news, but all might not be lost. If the clutch and steering function you should be able to enjoy the car as a driver. Wiring could probably be done in sections. Just because the upholstery and interior "isn't right" doesn't mean you can't enjoy the car by driving it. Many of us in the hobby don't have deep enough pockets to restore a car, but that doesn't stop us from driving them and enjoying them even if they might be a little funky. From the little bit that can be viewed from the pictures, the car looks salvageable. Please take time and weigh options before making any decisions. Carl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
39BuickEight Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Worst case, couldn't you sell it with the disclaimer that the conversion was a home-made sort of job? It still has value, that's for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daves1940Buick56S Posted April 16, 2014 Share Posted April 16, 2014 Don't do anything drastic! Things may not be as grim as you think. First, attend to the safety issues. See what needs to be done with the wiring. It's not really very complicated on these old machines. Get a 37 shop manual and the parts books and run thru it and see what is different. Do not worry about your interior at this point. I have a Naugahyde interior and at this point I am fine with it. Then break the work down into tasks and prioritize. Do as much as you can yourself. You have a great resource here in this forum, we are here to help as we can.Cheers Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jon Barker Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Another update now that I have calmed down and come to my senses. I have discovered a great guy over here who knows these cars inside out and is now working on all the essential repairs to make the car roadworthy. Our conclusion is that this is a Flint car, imported to England at an unknown time but as a left hand-drive. Someone did a rather patchy RHD conversion leaving the clutch mechanism as it was but incorporating a weird set of levers from the pedal to enable the clutch to still work. We have decided that the car is definitely worth saving so it is currently undergoing a total rewire, brake overhaul and a load of other things which need attention. At the end of this I will have a useable if not totally authentic Buick. It has cost me more than it should have but really that's my fault and I wouldn't make the same mistake again. I'm glad so many people talked sense into me as I would hate to part with the car. Hopefully my rash outburst is understandable to other members - I will post some more photos of the car when it's back on the road and any more we can find out about its rather mysterious history. The dealer who would know some of these details has vanished ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
39BuickEight Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 The more you end up driving it, the more it will actually have been worth it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daves1940Buick56S Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Jon:Outstanding! Things always look better after you sleep on them some. I almost gave up on mine a while back but the encouragement on this forum kept me going. And look at it this way - you will have a very unique car and one heckuva conversation starter at car shows.Cheers, Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1937-44 Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Jon we could all understand the frustration in your earlier post. Although it might not be totally "authentic" I hope the two of you have many enjoyable miles together. After all they were made to be driven. Looking forward to seeing those pictures and good luck. Carl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jon Barker Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 The forum has been invaluable both for technical know-how and the encouragement I have received. Never thought I'd find some Buick fanatics in this country as well ! Many thanks to all who supplied the support - I would have been devastated not to have got it right. Will provide more when I get it back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
50jetback Posted April 22, 2014 Share Posted April 22, 2014 Another update now that I have calmed down and come to my senses. I have discovered a great guy over here who knows these cars inside out and is now working on all the essential repairs to make the car roadworthy. Our conclusion is that this is a Flint car, imported to England at an unknown time but as a left hand-drive. Someone did a rather patchy RHD conversion leaving the clutch mechanism as it was but incorporating a weird set of levers from the pedal to enable the clutch to still work. We have decided that the car is definitely worth saving so it is currently undergoing a total rewire, brake overhaul and a load of other things which need attention. At the end of this I will have a useable if not totally authentic Buick. It has cost me more than it should have but really that's my fault and I wouldn't make the same mistake again. I'm glad so many people talked sense into me as I would hate to part with the car. Hopefully my rash outburst is understandable to other members - I will post some more photos of the car when it's back on the road and any more we can find out about its rather mysterious history. The dealer who would know some of these details has vanished !Considering the circumstances it may well be worth your while ( not to mention safer ) to return the vehicle to its original LHD configuration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jon Barker Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 A later update to the saga of this car, but a more upbeat one. The rewiring and brake overhaul is complete along with other alterations such as removing the ugly semaphores and the mirrors on the spare wheel covers. A new battery also was required. It is now awaiting a new exhaust manifold, which has just arrived here from the US, as the existing one is leaking badly and has been patched up in the past. Hopefully that will make a big difference. I have taken the car to three shows this summer and, as you can imagine, it attracts a lot of attention as these Buicks are not too common in England, especially in the far south west where I am. I also drove it down to Lands End and got some good photos, one of which is now in my member gallery. Thanks again for all the help and encouragement as it has really paid off and I can look forward to more fun driving next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1937-44 Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 Hi Jon, Thanks for the update. I'm glad you have taken on the challenge to keep the old girl on the road and are enjoying the attention and joy of driving her. You have joined the ranks of many of us who enjoy the cars and accept the fact work and money need to be invested, but the joy is the car and the hobby. Carl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jon Barker Posted November 21, 2014 Share Posted November 21, 2014 Hi Jon, Thanks for the update. I'm glad you have taken on the challenge to keep the old girl on the road and are enjoying the attention and joy of driving her. You have joined the ranks of many of us who enjoy the cars and accept the fact work and money need to be invested, but the joy is the car and the hobby. CarlCarl, I couldn't agree more. In fact, although I have little experience of addiction, I think that may be the word I would use to describe my relationship with the Buick! But I have learnt (and spent) a lot in the last year and it has only served to encourage me. There is simply no substitute for these type of cars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now