6T-FinSeeker Posted November 22, 2023 Share Posted November 22, 2023 (edited) For sale on Facebook: 1951 Hudson Pacemaker 4-door Sedan in Ida Grove, IA - $4,000 - Must be a member of Facebook to access Seller's contact information. Link: https://www.facebook.com/marketplace/item/704985184563803/-1951-Hudson-Pacemaker-Sedan Seller's Description: 1951 Hudson Pacemaker 4-door Sedan Driven 85,998 miles Automatic transmission Exterior color: Green · Interior color: Tan Clean title This vehicle has no significant damage or problems 1951 Hudson Pacemaker, nice solid original condition, stored since 1977, not running. Own a rare piece of history. Edited December 26, 2023 by 6T-FinSeeker update status (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twisted Shifter Posted November 22, 2023 Share Posted November 22, 2023 What's that growing on the fender skirts? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plymouthcranbrook Posted November 22, 2023 Share Posted November 22, 2023 I wager lots of rust. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xander Wildeisen Posted November 22, 2023 Share Posted November 22, 2023 The fender skirt tucks in behind the perimeter frame rail. The rear fender bolts down to the outside of the frame rail. When you see rust showing in this area, you know there is an issue with the rear frame rail above the skirt. One of the common areas these cars start to develop rust. 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B Jake Moran Posted November 22, 2023 Share Posted November 22, 2023 Wasn't the Pacemaker the lowest cost entry for Hudson? Not that it matters much at this point. I do not think in 1951 Hudson offered an eight cylinder. Big mistake. I owned a 49 Commodore 8 but that motor was very pre war technology and the 308 6 cylinder was actually a new design. But they never went further and when you go from offering an 8 cylinder in 1949-50 to "oh, we are only going to offer 6 cylinder motors now, and flatheads to boot", and the competition is coming out with V8's, well bye bye Hudson. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Posted November 22, 2023 Share Posted November 22, 2023 Except that those 308 sixes were as fast or faster than any V8 American cars you could buy at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xander Wildeisen Posted November 22, 2023 Share Posted November 22, 2023 3 hours ago, B Jake Moran said: Wasn't the Pacemaker the lowest cost entry for Hudson? Not that it matters much at this point. I do not think in 1951 Hudson offered an eight cylinder. Big mistake. I owned a 49 Commodore 8 but that motor was very pre war technology and the 308 6 cylinder was actually a new design. But they never went further and when you go from offering an 8 cylinder in 1949-50 to "oh, we are only going to offer 6 cylinder motors now, and flatheads to boot", and the competition is coming out with V8's, well bye bye Hudson. 52 was the last year for the Commodore 8, no pacemaker left the factory with the 8 cylinder engine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 55er Posted November 22, 2023 Share Posted November 22, 2023 Pacemakers were the lowest-priced Hudson line and they were made from 1950-1952. They were on a shorter 119" wheelbase than the larger series Hudsons with a 124" wheelbase There were quite a few Pacemaker models available including a Convertible Brougham in 1950-1951. The front ends of the Pacemakers & Wasps were shorter and had kind of a stubby look to them. The Pacemaker front fenders & hoods do not interchange with the larger series Hudsons. The smaller 232 cu.in. six (like in this green Pacemaker that's for sale) was the standard engine in 1950 & 1951 with the larger 262 six optional equipment on 1951 & 1952s. IMO $4K for a somewhat tired looking rusty non-running Pacemaker is pretty optimistic and a better appointed step-down Commodore or Hornet would make for a better (and more recognizable) historical project. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6T-FinSeeker Posted December 26, 2023 Author Share Posted December 26, 2023 On 12/18, Seller marked the Facebook ad "SOLD!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Roth Posted December 27, 2023 Share Posted December 27, 2023 On 11/22/2023 at 10:26 AM, B Jake Moran said: Wasn't the Pacemaker the lowest cost entry for Hudson? Not that it matters much at this point. I do not think in 1951 Hudson offered an eight cylinder. Big mistake. I owned a 49 Commodore 8 but that motor was very pre war technology and the 308 6 cylinder was actually a new design. But they never went further and when you go from offering an 8 cylinder in 1949-50 to "oh, we are only going to offer 6 cylinder motors now, and flatheads to boot", and the competition is coming out with V8's, well bye bye Hudson. @B Jake Moran Jake, Hudson did, in fact, continue their Commodore Straight Eight cylinder through both 1951 and 1952, a High School friend years ago had a '51, and a musician I worked with had the '52, although they were earlier tech, and the 308 was hot stuff 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xander Wildeisen Posted December 28, 2023 Share Posted December 28, 2023 Parts car for my coupe, 1952 Commodore 8 sedan. Last of the 8 cylinders. Until the V8’s in the Hash’s(Hudson+Nash) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now