Jump to content

Will 1953-54 Skylark Wheels fit a 1949 Roadmaster?


Dan O

Recommended Posts

Greetings!

 

Is the bolt pattern the same?  I found a set of apparently OEM wire wheels with SKYLARK on the spinners and decent Coker bias ply tires mounted.  I do not see any damage and the chrome is good.  Tires are older - date code is "129" which I assume is 12th month of 2009 since they were mounted pre-2014.

 

I think these would look great on my '49 convertible.  And yes, I have read the discussions on here regarding truing the rims and balance and difficulty keeping clean but I have always wanted a set of wires on something!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JohnD1956 said:

I think you should make sure the hub diameter of the rim will be big enough to fit your hub.

That should not be a problem since the centers on wire wheels is larger than steel wheels making them lug-centric vs hub-centric on the steel wheels.

Hint:  cut the heads off a couple of lug nuts and cut slots in the ends to make it easier to line up and mount the wires.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, old-tank said:

That should not be a problem since the centers on wire wheels is larger than steel wheels making them lug-centric vs hub-centric on the steel wheels.

 

OK, but is the bolt pattern going to match up from the newer '53-'54 wires to my older '49? 

 

And the '49 uses lug bolts that screw into the wheel hub - is that the same on the '53-'54 or a problem?  I bet the '53-'54 has the lugs on the hub, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Dan O said:

Greetings!

 

Is the bolt pattern the same?  I found a set of apparently OEM wire wheels with SKYLARK on the spinners and decent Coker bias ply tires mounted.  I do not see any damage and the chrome is good.  Tires are older - date code is "129" which I assume is 12th month of 2009 since they were mounted pre-2014.

 

I think these would look great on my '49 convertible.  And yes, I have read the discussions on here regarding truing the rims and balance and difficulty keeping clean but I have always wanted a set of wires on something!

Hi Dan O

Those tires are from the 12th week of 1999 or 1989 or 1979. After the year 2000, the codes were four digits 2 digits for the week of the year and 2 digits for the year. 

Hope this helps.

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, FireballV8 said:

Hi Dan O

Those tires are from the 12th week of 1999 or 1989 or 1979. After the year 2000, the codes were four digits 2 digits for the week of the year and 2 digits for the year. 

Hope this helps.

 

1999?  These tires look like they have not been driven many miles but 1999 was a long time ago for a tire - that changes the trade if I need to swap out tires.  I have included a photo - are those actually Buick factory wheels?

 

 

369215033_7100634266648200_508291880059496597_n.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, old-tank said:

Old bias tires are fine as long as they look good and are not flat spotted, but those  L78-15 Coker Commanders are horrid tires even when new.  You will curse every revolution.

I don't know much about old bias ply tires longevity so any info is appreciated.  I have some great looking old Denman Classics with no apparent tread wear  I think they date from, what, the 50th week of 1993?  Or 1983?

 

So, those are reliable at 70 mph??  I use one as a spare as you see,

 

Denman Date Code.jpg

IMG-5899.jpg

IMG-5901.jpg

IMG-5900.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Dan O said:

I don't know much about old bias ply tires longevity so any info is appreciated.  I have some great looking old Denman Classics with no apparent tread wear  I think they date from, what, the 50th week of 1993?  Or 1983?

 

So, those are reliable at 70 mph??  I use one as a spare as you see,

 

Denman Date Code.jpg

IMG-5899.jpg

IMG-5901.jpg

IMG-5900.jpg

In my opinion i can't understand why someone would run 30+year old tires.

Especially to 70 mph.  If one cares not for their own safety at least think of the possible victims in the car next to you. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All GM big cars used 5 lug on 5 in bolt circle for years.   Certainly everything after WWII  when the intermediate cars came out

in 1962 those were all 5 lugs on 4 3/4 bolt circle.   The only exception I can think of was the Corvair was only 4 lugs from 1960-1964 and in 1965 they went to 5 lugs on 4 3/4 bc.   That would mean the Cadillac design wire wheel would also fit your Buick

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, JohnD1956 said:

In my opinion i can't understand why someone would run 30+year old tires.

Especially to 70 mph.  If one cares not for their own safety at least think of the possible victims in the car next to you. 

I did not say I wanted to run the old tires to 70 mph.  I just was asking for clarification on the roadability of older bias ply tires...  Harumph!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Realize you're no longer considering them but will just say, I'd have to see the wire wheel rims without the tires before spending near that for them. Rust could be a problem where the spokes mount to the rim. And by the way, I just mounted a set of new/20 year old tires to a set of KH for the 54 Roadmaster but as of right now it isn't running. Will change out once running.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...