Tom Laferriere Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Hi all, what can you tell me about this body builder on this car? Walker? More picture here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f147pu Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 Is there builder's plate under the carpet in front of the driver's seat? What is the serial number? The suffix will tell the body style or the builder if it is a custom.Gordon Howard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Laferriere Posted September 14, 2013 Author Share Posted September 14, 2013 Hi Gordon, 17 is the suffix. No builders plate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Braverman Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 I've seen pictures of this car before. It appears to be a 1926-27 Franklin Tandem Sport body on a 1930 chassis. Interesting combination. I wonder what the story on this one is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
odyssey Posted September 14, 2013 Share Posted September 14, 2013 I'm slightly familiar with this car as I have seen photos before. It is a Series 11 Tandem Sport body (1925-27) mounted to a 1930 Series 14 chassis.The Tandem Sports were 'Production-Customs', designed by deCausse. I am not sure where the bodies were built. The body conversion, coupled with the Packard (1933?) instrument panel suggests a modern-era conversion, as do many non- Franklin items and features such as the bumpers, grill, rear valence(or lack thereof). The Tandem Sports were striking sedans and the marriage to a late chassis should make for a fun driver, but this was not a factory job, or likely a period job.Tom Rasmussen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
West Peterson Posted October 27, 2013 Share Posted October 27, 2013 That is a very, very handsome car. It's body is a few years ahead of its time, as it looks perfectly natural on top of that 1930 chassis. If I had bought that car, and I wish I could have, I would eventually update the paint scheme as well, because the fiacre-motif outlined doors kind of ruins the effort of updating it. After having saved enough money, I would eventually paint the car all one color (definitely not red), and, of course, eliminate the Hollywood tires. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green37 Posted October 27, 2013 Share Posted October 27, 2013 I would eventually update the paint scheme as well, because the fiacre-motif outlined doors kind of ruins the effort of updating it. After having saved enough money, I would eventually paint the car all one color (definitely not red), and, of course, eliminate the Hollywood tires.-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OnSafari Posted October 27, 2013 Share Posted October 27, 2013 That is a very, very handsome car. It's body is a few years ahead of its time, as it looks perfectly natural on top of that 1930 chassis. If I had bought that car, and I wish I could have, I would eventually update the paint scheme as well, because the fiacre-motif outlined doors kind of ruins the effort of updating it. After having saved enough money, I would eventually paint the car all one color (definitely not red), and, of course, eliminate the Hollywood tires.I saw this too whilst at Hershey, and I would have liked to purchase it as well. Very handsome car. Tom, if you find another.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hook Posted October 31, 2013 Share Posted October 31, 2013 Although it is attractive and may be a good driver, so is a street rod or custom car. If the AACA stuck by their rules for the car coral this car would not have been accepted in it. It's a custom car with a body from another year, a custom grille, custom interior with a Packard dash panel. different bumpers and tail light. Not at all different from a street rod, custom car or kit car. It is not an "AACA" or "Classic Car Club" classic car or a legal antique car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franklin-Madman Posted October 31, 2013 Share Posted October 31, 2013 (edited) Although it is attractive and may be a good driver, so is a street rod or custom car. If the AACA stuck by their rules for the car coral this car would not have been accepted in it. It's a custom car with a body from another year, a custom grille, custom interior with a Packard dash panel. different bumpers and tail light. Not at all different from a street rod, custom car or kit car. It is not an "AACA" or "Classic Car Club" classic car or a legal antique car.But it is a Franklin and welcome at all HHFC events where it will be admired for what it is. Edited October 31, 2013 by Franklin-Madman (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hook Posted October 31, 2013 Share Posted October 31, 2013 But it is a Franklin and welcome at all HHFC events where it will be admired for what it is.You are absolutely, 100%, with out a doubt correct! We will not only welcome it to our events, we'll try to get the owner to give us a ride in it.Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now