1935Packard Posted March 6 Share Posted March 6 Bob Woolfit's very nice 1934 Packard Eight Coupe Roadster, three auction results over 9 years. I don't know if the car has been not well taken care of, or maybe these numbers are quirky, but the results seemed worth noting. 2015: $195,000 https://cars.bonhams.com/auction/22205/lot/142/1934-packard-eight-1101-coupe-roadster-chassis-no-71919-engine-no-374108/ 2018: $173,600 https://rmsothebys.com/en/auctions/am18/amelia-island/lots/r0014-1934-packard-eight-coupe-roadster/602482 2024: $134,400 https://rmsothebys.com/en/auctions/mi24/miami/lots/r0036-1934-packard-eight-coupe-roadster/1433627 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alsancle Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 Orin, a few things: 1. The high price was justified by the over the top restoration. Restorations tend to mellow with time. 2. The first two results were stupid high for a standard eight. 3. Auctions give you a price for a particular car at that location in that moment. Different time and place, different bidders, different results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prewarnut Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 I think the answer can be found on the graph.....😁 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tph479 Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 At the same auction a 1932 Packard 900 coupe roadster brought $313,000 with commission that has a 33 year old restoration. The auction was interesting in what some lots brought and what others didn’t. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1935Packard Posted March 7 Author Share Posted March 7 (edited) 6 hours ago, alsancle said: A few things: 1. The high price was justified by the over the top restoration. Restorations tend to mellow with time. 2. The first two results were stupid high for a standard eight. 3. Auctions give you a price for a particular car at that location in that moment. Different time and place, different bidders, different results. Aj, I agree as to (1) and (3). Although having followed the 1101 market pretty closely for a few years, I disagree as to (2). Those were pretty typical numbers for a nice open Eight. Edited March 7 by 1935Packard (see edit history) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now