Ovalrace25 Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 I have many uh,, experts telling me why and what they are using for oil.... So tell me what to put in the Shocks Rear Axle Transmission Steering BoxLets say we are working on a 29-30 Cadillac - 28 Packard - 29 Auburn and a 26 Willys-KnightYep I do have my own opinion, but we all have opinions… Tell me yours! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexRiv_63 Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 I'm having the same problem with my 28 Pierce so I will be watching this with interest. One thing that I have been told consistently by many sources is not to use modern sulfur-based GL-5 and GL-6 gear lubes in older trans and rear axles, they used bronze bushings and other parts and the sulfur apparently attacks and damages the metal. GL-4 is OK. True? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovalrace25 Posted February 22, 2008 Author Share Posted February 22, 2008 Yes, True.. Where are all the answers???Even opinions... Anyone??There have been plenty of recent articles in some of the old car guy magazines about engine oils.. Some even touch on the other oils.. But I sure would like th eread more from this forum.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Owen_Dyneto Posted February 22, 2008 Share Posted February 22, 2008 Tons of experience in this regard with Packards, 1932 (beginning of hypoid rear axles and synchromesh trans)to 1955 I have used Valvoline High Performance SAE85-140 EP gear oil in steering gear boxes, transmissions, rear axles and overdrives for 20 or more years in a dozen or so cars with no issues at all. In a 1931 Pierce that I service from time to time, I use straight SAE140 gear oil (GL-1). Both are available in 5 gallon pails, and the straight gear oil is usually a special order item.For shocks, I use Mobil's hydraulic oils, Mobil DTE-24 for SAE10, DTE-25 for SAE20. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
34PackardRoadsta Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 The service manual for my 30 Packard indicates 600W for differential, transmission and steering gear. Of course, I don't know if the 600W of 1929 is the same as today...Anyway, I was going to put in Lubriplate 600W. Tom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ZondaC12 Posted February 23, 2008 Share Posted February 23, 2008 There's a local '32-'48 Ford V8 resto/part repop business that sells this "600W Oil" that actually says www.macantiqueautoparts.com in fine print on the label. They told me it would be safe for the old bushings and stuff like that. The rear end fluid in my 38 was shockingly fine when I examined it before taking the car anywhere, but the transmission obviously needed something (and leaks) so I use it in that, and would in the rear if I needed to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dzchevy Posted February 24, 2008 Share Posted February 24, 2008 Mobil still makes 600w which is a steam cylinder oil. This has a similar consistency as 140W. The tech rep from Mobil said that this was fine for our tranmission/rearend applications. He stated that some of the new gear EP oils use sulphur base additives which can react with brass and bronze bushings.http://www.mobil.com/Canada-English/Lubes/PDS/IOCAENINDMOMobil_600W_Cylinder_Oil.aspI called Lubriplate some time ago and talked with their tech rep and they said that they have a gear oil SPO-277 which is comparable to today's 140w or Mobil 600w. It is a modern oil that doesn't contain the animal fats of the 600w. He said it is safe for bronze, brass and silver alloy. http://www.lubriplate.com/products/gear-bearing-recirculating/spo-series.htmlThese products are not for shocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ovalrace25 Posted February 28, 2008 Author Share Posted February 28, 2008 Good Info so far guys. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve_Mack_CT Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 One additional thought here - the 600w is very thick, I think even more so than the comparable modern 140w stuff that I understand to be the generally accepted replacement. One reason for the thickness in pre-synchro transmissions is to slow down the gear action for less chance of grinding. Would stay with thick oil in the trans on the earlier cars. I happen to use the oil from Mac's that Zonda mentions, but this is readilly available from most of the early Ford parts houses. I do not know who makes this for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now