dlapple Posted April 24, 2002 Share Posted April 24, 2002 I,m with you Hoot, Great little cars at<BR>a really good price with styling that is <BR>going to be timeless,,,,,,,what else do you<BR>want.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
padgett Posted April 24, 2002 Share Posted April 24, 2002 They are cheap today for the same reason that Deusies were $500 cars in 1946. Complicated, expensive to maintain, and more sellers than buyers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 25, 2002 Share Posted April 25, 2002 are Reattas collector cars yet? i think so, so why are they so cheap? the prices are the same as any other old heap. a smart car lover with money would buy them up now. when i hit the lottery i'm going to buy dozens of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 25, 2002 Share Posted April 25, 2002 These cars are just old enough that many first, or second, owners are now trading them for something newer. Couple that with many high mileage ones still going and padgett is right, there are a lot for sale right now.<BR>If this car follows past trends, the high mileage ones and not-well-cared-for will start to dissappear and the remaining ones will start to increase in value. I predict<BR>about 5 more years for that cycle to finish.<BR>BUT, there is one difference with Reattas: Most old cars that wildly rise in value were highly desirable when they were new. While the Reatta was, and is special, people weren't exactly lining up to buy it when new (which is mostly why they were discontinued). So, that aspect might keep eventual collector prices lower than, say, 60s muscle cars are now. To spend big money on an old car people needed to have dreamed about it when they were young. And as many of you report, people are always asking "what is it". So, for an eventual retirement nest egg a Duesie in the barn would still be better than our Reattas :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EDBS0 Posted April 25, 2002 Share Posted April 25, 2002 carz60 has it figured out when he says "Most old cars that wildly rise in value were highly desirable when they were new."<P>Like me, you better be buying and driving because you like the ride and uniqueness not for future investment potential. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sahein Posted April 25, 2002 Share Posted April 25, 2002 Yes! They are collectable and I am collecting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 25, 2002 Share Posted April 25, 2002 Have to add something to the equation: Little T-Birds ('55-'57) were very popular in the newish years, then fell into disfavor when Ford stopped producing parts (mainly trim). You could pick up a so-so '57 for about $1500 -- but you couldn't get window seals, hashmarks, fender skirts, etc., except used at high prices. Only when the specialty suppliers (John Baum, Jake, Larry, etc.) made arrangements for offshore production of parts did the market take off. Today, you can virtually build a new little Thunderbird from the ground up. But the production numbers have to support it. There were 53,000+ Birds built in those three years. Well over than half of them are still alive and accounted for, which supports a healthy marketplace. Now...take the total of Reattas built and try to factor in the number still in existence. Will that support reproduction of reproduction parks? Only time will tell.<P>A girl just clipped the rear of my '90 on the freeway. It scuffed the bumper guards, loosened the impact strip, scratched the lower fiberglass panel and pulled the fiberboard undercowling loose. Not a single one of those parts is available new; my body shop just ordered an entire rear end (bumper down) from Speedway. Wouldn't you think that at least the impact strip and bumper guards would be available new in a primer finish?<P>Jerry<P>P.S. Incidentally, the Reatta is built like a tank in the rear. As noted, the damage was really minor (cosmetic), but it totaled the new KIA that hit me. The hood was doubled up so high the driver couldn't see over it to drive. Took out the grille, bumper and both fenders/headlights, as well as the hood. Tough cars, these Reattas! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
padgett Posted April 26, 2002 Share Posted April 26, 2002 Keep in mind that poor sales when new is not a measure or desirability 20 years on but it takes 20 years to be recognized. Most muscle cars were essentially worthless between 1975 and 1985. Considering that the oldest Reatta is only 14 means that they are nearing the bottom of the curve.<P>If you want a good indicator, watch Fieros (1984-1988), they bottomed out and are starting up again particularly the '84 Pace Cars - talk about dead - they only had 80 hp - the 2.8 V-6 did not appear until 1985.<P>For that matter, most "muscle cars" really weren't, they just looked that way. Few, particularly the base models (the 318 Chrysler engine that powered many such was a joke in the industry) could even get into the fifteens.<P>Yes, it would have been nice if the SC engine had made it into the Reatta even just as an option but to me (and I have a 4spd Judge for fun) the n/a 3800 has always been "adequate". Nothing special from a standing start but the legendary Buick "turbine" effect just keeps coming. 50-70 is always a surprise, it just happens.<P>However if you look at the real collectables, many were too expensive for the time and just as many were considered slow by their contemporaries. For example, at the time the 55-57 T'bird was comsidered adequate but not in the same league as a dual quad or FI Corvette, an XK-140MC Jag, or even a 100-6 Healey.<P>Look around at what is valuable today and it is not the fastest, but the most optioned. Fast doesn't hurt but few collectors could handle the really fast cars anyway (have had affiacandos shudder when I power shift the Judge - what do they think these cars were for).<P>Ten years on, I doubt that the power will matter but today they are just too new. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Payette Posted April 26, 2002 Share Posted April 26, 2002 Let me offer a different perspective. As a large Buick dealer during the Reatta era, we found the cars very desireable BUT at sale prices around $30,000. Buick sold us many of the Reattas as company cars with "just around the block" miles in the high $20,000s.All the time Buick was building the car they complained that they lost $10,000 per car. The Reatta at the right price was a very popular car.I probably sold 25 or 30 Reattas and many of my customers are still drivig them!!!<BR>Tom Payette TPayetteKY@aol.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest EDBS0 Posted April 26, 2002 Share Posted April 26, 2002 Hey Tom; Just got back from THUNDER, what a show Louisville should be proud!!!<P>So what you are saying is that they were popular but pricey. Can't you say that about anything and any car? Wouldn't and couldn't you sell more of "ABC" be it beer or cars at a lower price. Don't get me wrong, I love the cars. The build quality is outstanding and the Reatta is nearly unique in this.<P>In any event it is good to hear from a Dealer on the Reatta. I think the Reatta is on the upside of the "U" shaped depreciation curve but it will likely be a slow climb.<BR> Doesn't start to do the show justice.<p>[ 04-25-2002: Message edited by: Easily Distracted by Shiny Objects ] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now