Jump to content

The 55er

Members
  • Posts

    1,916
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by The 55er

  1. This car is way overpriced and could well be a flip. It's a fairly nice car but it's not bonestock factory correct or near ready for Top Preservation class either. A few flaws are the red interior sunvisors, the "factory" dual exhaust that Olds never offered until 1956, a non-existent battery hold-down (one year only item, might be hard to find) and the modern Kumho radial tires. I don't see the correct plastic Power Steering insert in the steering wheel and 1953 Oldsmobiles never had carpeted trunks either. Little things like working e-brake & courtesy lights and correct wire hose clamps really aren't worth mentioning and hardly contribute anything to a $40K car. I might be critical and such criticism might not be proper and polite but Geez, we're talking about a car here that someone is trying  to get $40K for.  If the price was $20K I wouldn't even be commenting on it. It's hard to find any credibility at all with a seller with such an overpriced car and so many incorrect statements in the ad, all in his favor. And BTW, any fifties GM enthusiast knows those famous early Hydramatics were 4-speed units and not 3-speed as clearly stated in the ad. It makes you wonder if the seller even bothered to drive the car he trying to sell..........Again it IS a nice car and I'm sorry if I offended anyone but there are just too many things wrong with this ad to justify the high asking price of the car. 

    • Like 4
  2. Only problem with that is that ten years from now all those prospective future buyers that would have had any interest in those parts will be long gone and you might have to sell all those dirt cheap parts you bought even dirt cheaper. And by that time the vendor spaces will probably cost around $200 each!    Nice thought though and an A+ for some fresh innovative thinking, we could ceertainly use more of that!     BTW if you ever find any vendors at the Fall Meet selling anything dirt cheap please let me know their location, I haven't seen any there for the last 20-30 years.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  3. My guess is the car isn't in running condition or the seller would be touting that in the ad for all it's worth. In fact nothing about the car's mechanical condition is even mentioned at all. He's quick to point out all the options it has along with how wonderful the interior is. IMO the fact that the car's engine runs or even turns  is far more significant than the fact it once belonged to Little Jack Dempsey but even that unimportant tidbit is mentioned in the sales pitch. It's a neat wagon but I never much cared for the looks of 1963-1964 Chryslers, there might be other period station wagons available out there that are a lot cooler than this particular model. IF it's a non-runner or has been sitting for any length of time, all the typical stuff (brakes, fuel system, cooling system, electricals, exhaust, etc.) will have to be addressed along with a new dash pad & a cosmetic restoration including new paint (have you priced THAT lately?) if someone's goal is to the car to look like anything. I hope all those Ebay bidders took the time to contact the seller to verify the condition of everything before they submitted a bid or they might looking at a pretty involved & expensive project once they get it home. Really need to see more pictures of the engine, undercarriage and rear cargo area to get a firm grip on its condition and exactly what you're getting into.......

  4.  With the emblem & chrome script missing from the front fender and the style of the front seat, I'd have to question whether this is really a 1956 Coupe DeVille or the lesser (cheaper) Series 62 hardtop coupe. Non-AC car too. Right side rocker panel moulding is incorrect, should be wider and extend underneath the car. Fender skirts? Hopefully the front mounting bracket area didn't rust away. I'm sure the mileage of 8,376 is totally inaccurate. Price along with the missing title situation would be deal-breakers for me. Really need more pictures.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  5. As for the older Chiltons & Motors Manuals, it depends on the year & make of car. Some removal descriptions go into great detail like telling you to remove every little thing like wiring harnesses, battery cables, sending units, exhaust pipes, fuel pumps and even hoods and support crossmembers and in what order. Other makes say hardly anything at all, they basically just tell you to just lift the engine out after everything is moved out of the way.

  6. I had looked that 1950 Buick engine removal information up earlier in both the Chilton & Motors manuals and was surprised there was so little useful information in there. However I always thought the info & pictures in those thick hardbound universal repair books was taken straight from the actual automaker's shop manuals so if there was no specific engine removal info in the 1950 Buick shop manual there won't be any in the Chilton & Motors manuals either. I'll admit I could be completely wrong about this, just the impression I got over the years. However, both those vintage aftermarket repair book lines have a lot of useful information in them and are a nice addition to anyone's auto repair or restoration library. 

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...