buick looks fine for 39 Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 A while back I wrote a post regarding the use of 40-47 synchros in a 39 Buick Special transmission. There are 2 different part numbers for 38-39 synchros and 40-47 synchros. Many people believed the two different synchro types were not interchangeable. I posted the different part numbers were due to a synchro design change. 38-39 synchros were spin poured in a steel shell like a babbitt connecting rod and the brass friction surface was machined into the synchro. 40-47 synchros had the brass friction surface press fitted into the steel shell. Years ago I found a Muncie (?) interchange manual and it listed 38-47 as having the same part number. I believed 40-47 synchros were superior to 38-39s because the earlier synchros had a tendency to delaminate and shed brass fragments into the gear box. Today I made my maiden voyage in my 39 Buick 46c with 40-47 synchros and the transmission performed flawlessly. Finding 40-47 synchros are still like hen's teeth but It might give folks more flexibility who own 38s and 39s if 40-47s will work as well. Thanks Leif 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Posted March 7 Share Posted March 7 (edited) Good to know this works back to 38. A year or two further back there was a change in cone angle, and a potential gotcha exists with synchros that look like they fit but don't function in use. Edited March 7 by Bloo (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buick looks fine for 39 Posted March 8 Author Share Posted March 8 Thanks for the input. A change in cone angle between 38-39 and 40-47 was the main concern regarding interchangeability. In my car it dosen't seem to be a problem. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloo Posted March 8 Share Posted March 8 There is a Buick service bulletin with a dire warning about the angle mismatch, and I have seen it in the last year or so, but I can't quite remember. It occurred at either 1936/1937 or 1937/1938. It surprised me at the time. Until I saw that bulletin I had been thinking that the change occurred in the later 30s. Obviously not. This is for the 40 series transmission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buick looks fine for 39 Posted March 8 Author Share Posted March 8 Thanks Gary, that sounds better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now