Jump to content

Starting the Kimes Book


Guest BJM

Recommended Posts

With winter upon us, I am finally starting the Kimes Packard book. 1st thing I do is lift it over my head 20 times to exercise the muscles required to hold it evenly for careful reading.

I've already learned something new in the Forward. Studebaker-Packard formally ended the Packard name in 1962.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i picked up a book years ago "ok to drive away" which is like a kids reader, except all the pictures where taken in the packard plant around 1952

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind as you read the chapters in the Kimes book on the very early Packards that information that came to light well after publication from some long-lost archives of G. L. Weiss revised and/or corrected some of original info in the Kimes book. This new data was used by Terry Martin and published as "Packard - the Warren Years" in 2006; I believe the book is available from the Warren museum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've already learned something new in the Forward. Studebaker-Packard formally ended the Packard name in 1962.

I already found that out 20+ years ago. I found a book that was titled something like "The Postwar Packard, 1946-62". I thought I was going to see all kinds of cool concepts designed to return Packard to production, but it was only the name that carried on to 1962 with no car, or hopes of resurrection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LINC400, perhaps you're referring to Nat Dawes' find book, "The Packard: 1942-1962". Some very useful appendeces in the reference section of this book.

Yes, that is it. Very good book. I just thought with a title of 1942-1962, it gave the impression that you would be seeing some concepts or something beyond 1958 going on through 1962.

Edited by LINC400 (see edit history)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest John_Lawrence

O_D, thanks for the comment about the Terry Martin book. I purchased a copy for the museum store and I am enjoying reading it. Interesting that AQ would not issue a revised edition with additional and corrected information. This often happens with books with reprints. Its good that Martin went ahead and wrote the book to keep history correct.

(o[]o)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...