rustlover

Thank you Mr. Bowman. Im not trying to be difficult here, and as I stated I understand the need to defend the position, but no-one wants to acknowledge the elephant in the room. I heard what I heard. Those at my table heard it as well. The Director clearly supported modified vehicles in AACA National, but no-one is willing to admit that. Characterizing it as a minor misspoken response, and acting as if yours truly is hearing things or taking them out of context is something I would expect at a Whitehouse Press conference of either party, but not here. Everyone is jumping in suddenly to cover this, but it still stands. It happened multiple times not just once. Again, I really appreciate the engagement, but I do not wish to be dismissed. I heard what I heard gentlemen. You obviously have some housekeeping issues as your board is not in synch. Its disappointing.

I appreciate all the replies, particularly those from current Directors, and I understand the need to close ranks and "tow the company line". However, characterizing her statements as misspoken in an attempt to be polite to one individuals' comments gives me no comfort. I would have thought the same had she not responded in kind to three people in the same fashion. She very clearly articulated a position or personal opinion supporting the inclusion of modified vehicles in AACA National. Others at my table felt similarly. I wasn't hearing things. It was said, and in clear terms. in fact her position led to further supporting discussion of that position. I hate to feel forced to defend my position on modified vehicles on an AACA forum but given that this is a public forum and not one requiring AACA membership, I know some may jump to the conclusion that I am a crusty old guy who hates modified cars...I actually own two. I also show them at region events. Im not old or crusty either HA. I think the inclusiveness in working with others is a good thing, but AACA is the only club to my knowledge outside of the Veteran Car Club which is based upon stock vehicles...the librarys mission supports stock vehicles, and many members including myself recently donated to that cause, which is another reason I am expressing concern. Obviously, at least one member of the AACA Board supports changing AACA Nationals posture and mission. IF there is a discussion going on behind board doors about such a change, there needs to be transparency. Not including the memberships opinions on something of this magnitude is governing malfeasance. I have noticed there are fewer opportunities at National events for members to discuss opinions...helpful ones in most cases. If there are moves in this direction, then there should be an open discussion about it. If as Mr. Rossi says, there are no changes, then perhaps there needs to be an official statement from the President on behalf of the entire board to that effect. Clarification is needed...there were a couple hundred people there. If AACA makes any change, I hope it includes the opinions of the majority of its membership. Ignoring the general constituency is a hallmark of todays politicians, it should not be the same here. It is not as if my concerns here were organic, I came to address them because of what was clearly articulated at our membership meeting. Perhaps this Director is rogue, but repercussions should exist if they are out of line or incompetent. AACA membership does not have a great trajectory. Situations like this make that more difficult to improve. AACA already has an image issue. I thoroughly enjoy the club, the magazine, and its members. Should AACA make a course change I will accept that, but will likely leave your ranks. Also, I appreciate Mr. Hinsons thoughtful reply as well...I neglected to mention that earlier.

First time poster here. I attended my third AACA convention this year. The location was great, and the seminars were very good. However, when I went to the membership meeting I was shocked to hear the AACA director who moderated the Q and A supporting the addition of restomods/highly modified vehicles to AACA National events. Isn't the restoration and preservation of original automobiles the intended purpose of AACA?? Did I miss something?? I don't recall this topic being covered in the magazine. I am involved with AACA because they support the history and originality of the automobiles. If I want modified cars I can join a street rod club. I looked up this persons biography in my magazine collection and they not once mentioned they were wanting to change AACA. How did this happen? Is there a way to recall Directors? I was very saddened by this