GM Powertrain

[86 2dr.ltd]

Ey,get out the strait jacket,someones crakin' up.

[Guest]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Chuck2023:<BR><B>Ah, yes it says revised 4.0 thus a Buick based Rover designed engine, not Buick designed.</B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>Didn't GM sell the tooling for the aluminum block V8 to Rover in 1963... <BR><P>------------------<BR> <A HREF="http://members.fortunecity.com/gmfan33/index.html" TARGET=_blank>The Classic Car Resource Page</A>

[Guest]

exactly the tooling was sold the engine is gone what does this matter my original topic is about less expensive engines in higher priced/classified cars.

[Guest]

Well... if you're interested in GM corporate engines, see what they've got going on in Australia..<BR> <A HREF="http://www.holden.com.au/sc07_hsv/linkHSV.html" TARGET=_blank>http://www.holden.com.au/sc07_hsv/linkHSV.html</A> <P>Those supercharged RWD Buick V6's and LS1 Chevy's make those babies RUN down under!<P>Greg

[Guest]

Oops! This one might be better...<BR> <A HREF="http://www.hsv.com.au/cars/cars.htm" TARGET=_blank>http://www.hsv.com.au/cars/cars.htm</A> <P><BR>Greg

[Guest]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by WF59B:<BR><B>AND under the 'history' link, they list the Saab turbo of '77 (all the while ignoring the Olds Jetfire & Corvair turbos) as a historical developement of GM. Saab and GM had NOTHING to do with each other in '77.</B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>I didn't even know Saab and GM were toghther now. It is odd that the Saab turbo is historical, but the Buick Turbo V6 the next year isn't even mentioned.<P><P>------------------<BR>Rich George - b4black@flash.net <BR><B>BEFORE BLACK Website</B> - <A HREF="http://home.flash.net/~rjgeorge" TARGET=_blank>http://home.flash.net/~rjgeorge</A>