X-Frame Posted June 23, 2011 Share Posted June 23, 2011 I am not sure if you can help or forward my question to someone who can?From all I can see and I may be wrong, it looks like the Nash / Lafayette frames (chassis) are identical for years 1932-1939 (one for the 6 and one for the 8) then changed in 1940 for that one year run.Is that correct? If so, it is unusual since so many car makes changed designs if not every year every 2-3 years during that era.Any help appreciated. Thanks!Eric Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nashtwin8 Posted April 10, 2012 Share Posted April 10, 2012 No, that is not correct. A look at the wheelbase specs alone will show you that Nash had many different chassis during the years you ask about. 1937-1939 chassis were pretty much the same, except for a major redesign of the ohv 6 & 8 cylinder heads, intake & exhaust systems for '38, and '40 made a switch to independent front suspension across the board. Here's a quick rundown to help you sort it all out.1932 1st SeriesSeries 990 - 124 & 133" wheelbases, 298.6 cu in OHV twin ignition straight 8Series 980 - 121" wheelbase, 240 cu in OHV twin ignition straight 8Series 970 - 116.25" wheelbase, 227.2 cu in flathead straight 8Series 960 - 114.25" wheelbase, 201.3 cu in flathead 61932 2nd SeriesSeries 1090 - 133 & 142" wheelbases, 322 cu in OHV twin ignition straight 8 with worm drive rear endSeries 1080 - 128" wheelbase, 260.8 cu in OHV twin ignition straight 8 with worm drive rear endSeries 1070 - 121" wheelbase, 247.4 cu in flathead straight 8Series 1060 - 116" wheelbase, 201.3 cu in flathead 61933Series 1190 - 133 & 142" wheelbases, 322 cu in OHV twin ignition straight 8 with worm drive rear endSeries 1180 - 128" wheelbase, 260.8 cu in OHV twin ignition straight 8 with worm drive rear endSeries 1170 - 121" wheelbase, 247.4 cu in flathead straight 8Series 1130 - 116" wheelbase, 247.4 cu in flathead straight 8Series 1120 - 116" wheelbase, 217.8 cu in flathead 61934 - all except LaFayette available with independent front suspension, optional (Baker AxleFlex articulated beam axle) - (1934 only)Series 1290 - 133 & 142" wheelbases, 322 cu in OHV twin ignition straight 8 with worm drive rear endSeries 1280 - 121" wheelbase, 260.8 cu in OHV twin ignition straight 8Series 1220 - 116" wheelbase, 234.8 cu in OHV twin igintion 6LaFayette Series 110 - 110" wheelbase, 217.8 cu in flathead 61935Series 3580 - 125" wheelbase, 260.8 cu in OHV twin ignition straight 8Series 3520 - 120" wheelbase, 234.8 cu in OHV twin igintion 6Series 3540 - 117" wheelbase, 234.8 cu in flathead 6LaFayette Series 3510 - 113" wheelbase, 217.8 cu in flathead 61936Series 3680 - 125" wheelbase, 260.8 cu in OHV twin ignition straight 8Series 3620 - 125" wheelbase, 234.8 cu in OHV twin igintion 6Series 3640, 3640A - 117" wheelbase, 234.8 cu in flathead 6LaFayette Series3610, 3610A - 113" wheelbase, 217.8 cu in flathead 61937Series 3780 - 125" wheelbase, 260.8 cu in OHV twin ignition straight 8Series 3720 - 121" wheelbase, 234.8 cu in OHV twin igintion 6Series 3710 - 117" wheelbase, 234.8 cu in flathead 61938Series 3880 - 125" wheelbase, 260.8 cu in OHV twin ignition straight 8Series 3820 - 121" wheelbase, 234.8 cu in OHV twin igintion 6Series 3810 - 117" wheelbase, 234.8 cu in flathead 61939Series 3980 - 125" wheelbase, 260.8 cu in OHV twin ignition straight 8Series 3920 - 121" wheelbase, 234.8 cu in OHV twin igintion 6Series 3910 - 117" wheelbase, 234.8 cu in flathead 61940 - with independent front suspensionSeries 4080 - 125" wheelbase, 260.8 cu in OHV twin ignition straight 8Series 4020 - 121" wheelbase, 234.8 cu in OHV twin igintion 6Series 4010 - 117" wheelbase, 234.8 cu in flathead 6Like some of the other independent automakers, Nash was rather busy juggling engines and wheelbases, trying to come up with the combinations that would attract the most sales. As the Great Depression wore on, they were forced to cut back on the combinations, and finally hit on a combination that seemed to work well for a few years.Take care,Jerry K Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Continental Posted April 23, 2012 Share Posted April 23, 2012 Makes sense as Lafayette was just a "by Nash" car until '37. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now