Bill Yacey Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 I have a rebuilt 1964 394 and a 1959 hydramatic that I want to put into a 62 Olds. The front motor mount appears to need to sit higher, and is there enough room under the hump for the 1959 4 speed hydramatic?Has anyone done this?Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfire61 Posted December 14, 2008 Share Posted December 14, 2008 The '59 transmission likely will not clear the hump in your '62 Olds.Among the other "virtues" of the Slim-Jim trans touted on its debut in 1961 was the significantly lower floor hump compared to earlier years. Seen side-by-side, the Slim-Jim is quite a bit smaller than the older hydramatic.Unfortunately, there's no easy replacement for the Slim-Jim in '61-64 Oldsmobiles. Older hydramatics will bolt right up to the engine, but they won't clear the body of the car. Fitting a later transmission to the 394 is an expensive, pitfall-laden option that requires adapter plates, as well as modifying the driveshaft & the crossmember.Is your Slim-Jim dead, or you just don't like it?For what it would cost to install something else, I'd just as soon get used to the quirks of a functioning Slim-Jim! Chuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Yacey Posted December 14, 2008 Author Share Posted December 14, 2008 I thought it would be nice to get rid of the Slim Jim once and for all, and put in a solid transmission that will take the torque that this engine will provide. I've seen too many cracked aluminum torque converter housings on these Slim Jims, and they seem to have excessive slippage. Maybe it would be worth the effort to retrofit a 4L80. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now