-
Posts
296 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Forums
Gallery
Events
Posts posted by supersix
-
-
I believe the Powerflite was available in '54 Plymouths.
-
Wouldn't it just burn-up with the gasoline?
-
-
-
It's a nice looking car but, the A/C nor the power brakes are factory, the air-cleaner is from a T-Bird but would have never been used on the full sized cars, the interior should be red and white vinyl according to the data plate. I can't tell what the two color codes, except maybe the "K".
The engine fender tag is completely wrong. It should be like this.
What is that front seat out of?
-
The fire wasn't actually at the museum. It was at a warehouse that housed some cars that the museum owned. Nevertheless, a sad story.
-
The 2-door hardtop was called the "Catalina" in those years.
-
It looks to be a 1962 Chrysler New Yorker. That should be a 413 engine, if original.
-
The narrow whitewalls on this one make it look more like it was photographed in the 60's or later
.
-
Somewhere in my collection of car magazines that I saved when I was a kid, there is a short article, w/picture, of a "factory" or "prototype" (I can't recall) Mark II convertible. I think it was in a <span style="font-style: italic">Motor Trend </span>or <span style="font-style: italic">Motor Life</span> magazine. I saw your car at the Ault Park concours. Beautiful car. We were entered with a '54 Hudson.
If my memory is correct of the b&w picture, the car was white or at least light colored.
This is the clip I was referring to:
-
Probably a '74 or '75. Looks more like a '74 with possibly later body parts. Definitely not a factory 350/350 HP.
-
It's a '50 Hudson Pacemaker, which had a shorter wheelbase than the Super 6 and Commodore.
-
Fury? You've got to be kidding me!
-
The Hudson in the images appears to be a Pacemaker, not a Commodore. A Pacemaker would be a series 50A or 500.
- 1
-
Apparently no reply to this one either.
-
I would think one would get a reply from the AACA on an AACA website!
-
-
How do you "view the full article"? A click on the link is the same as the preview.
-
I my opinion, the 8/10 is much better looking than the Samco cars.
-
I would guess 99% then.
Maybe you just don't have a cell phone or like seeker don't know how to use it. LOL
I guess that the only replies here would be those that have not. Could we all man up and be honest with ourselves here? How about a poll?
I have and am not proud of that. If I feel I need to text I now pull over. I have to pull over to hook up my hands free phone system as well. (put in the ear buds and plug them in).
No deceptive or "trick" answer here. I have a cell phone and can use it. I text quite often. I have never texted while driving.
-
Texting. That's what causes rear end collisions these days.
We have all done it but its wrong.
No, we haven't "all" done it!
-
Highly unlikely as Lincoln advertised the Liquimatic (semi-automatic) Transmission for the 1942 model year. Supposedly all of the few built were recalled and replaced with manual transmission. Lincoln would not have an automatic until 1949. A GM built Hydra-Matic.
-
That top looks terrible.
- 1
-
Well maybe not THAT desperate.
Did they make an SS Impala Convertible in 1963?
in General Discussion
Posted
No solid lifter 327 was ever offered as a regular-production option on an Impala.