Jump to content

starlightcoupe

Members
  • Posts

    776
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by starlightcoupe

  1. 3 hours ago, drdon said:

    I sent it in to the Wiperman (Ficken Wiper Service). It is like new. 

     

    Yes, Bill rebuilt mine as well, almost twenty years ago. He's the one who advised to keep it working you just need to use it regularly.

    He also indicated the lubricant he uses is specific to the vacuum wiper motor and no other lubricant should be introduced.

    I guess it's time to do it again.

    • Like 1
  2. 11 hours ago, tevel said:

     Does anyone have some sort of in formation on par numbers and suppliers?

    You can procure a chassis parts catalog, reprint of the original from a Studebaker vendor, in print or on CD-ROM to find all the part numbers you will ever need. The CD-ROM version also includes the body parts catalog and the shop manual.

    Truckloads of the leftover pipe inventory were saved when the factory shut down, but I don't know who has them; and correct identification by part number would be essential.

    Most of the exhaust shops here in the States can easily fabricate a full system from the manifold to the tail pipe. I would be surprised if a shop near you can't do the same.

    And, as Craig mentioned, Don Simmons at Silvertone in Canada can ship you a complete stainless system that will simply bolt right in.

  3. On 12/17/2019 at 3:02 PM, Buffalowed Bill said:

    I haven't been able to locate my most recent SDC rooster, so I hope information on this gentleman is correct. Not only does he seem to know his radios, but I think that he may even have a 55(car).

    Roy Valdez "Radio Roy"

    Box 528

    Camino Ca.95709

    530 644 7644

    royvaldez@jps.net

     

     Bill

    Oops! Bill!

    Roy Valdez is NOT Radio Roy. Roy Yost is Radio Roy.

    Roy Yost
    30 Clinton St
    Redwood City, CA  94062
    Roy Valdez deals in internally controlled antennas. Roy Yost rebuilds radios.
  4. This ad appears in this months Turning Wheels, the publication of the Studebaker Drivers Club.

    I don't know what he's got; but it's a place to start.

     

    There's also a fellow in our SDC chapter who rebuilds radios and has them available at our swap meets.

    He may or may not as well.  I'll send a PM with his contact information if I can.

    001.jpg

  5. The lens you are looking for was listed by Studebaker as part# 301901.

     

    I broke one of mine many years ago and found replacements from a vendor specializing in antique auto lamps and lenses. I don't remember who.

    Your favorite search engine might turn up a number of possibilities. Proper identification is important. I'm certain these same lamps were used on more than just the Rocknes.

     

    https://duckduckgo.com/?q=antique+auto+headlight+lenses+for+sale&t=ffnt&atb=v182-1&ia=web

     

    The lens is a 9-3/16" circle.

     

     

    PA060085.JPG

    PA060089.JPG

  6. It's easy to understand Rockne model confusion. Though I suspect the logic of their designations is long lost to history.

    The two prototypes produced by Ralph Vail and Roy Cole were never called Rocknes. In fact, I don't believe anyone knows if they were ever called anything. They were produced by Vail and Cole under contract to Willys-Overland. And when W-O determined not to produce them, the two engineers got to keep the prototypes.

     

    One day as Vail was out driving his, he decided to stop in South Bend and show it to Albert Erskine, who drove it and agreed to make it a Studebaker product that same day.

    To name the new product a Rockne, in homage to Knute Rockne, was an afterthought, as Knute was killed on March 31, 1931; and the first Rocknes did not roll off the assembly line for another nine months.

     

    The 1932 Rockne of Vail-Cole design was marketed as the Model '65'; but in the Studebaker Parts depot it was a Model 30.

    The 1933 Rockne of Vail-Cole design was marketed as the Model '10'; but in the Studebaker Parts depot it was a Model 31.

    To further confuse matters, Barney Roos was assigned the task of outfitting the Studebaker Model '54' to be a larger model Rockne, and designated the Model '75'; which is identified  in the Parts Depot as a Model 41.

    I'm sure that clears things up. 🥴

     

    So, those parts would NOT be from a 1931 Rockne. But they COULD be Model 31 parts, in which case they would be from a 1933 Model '10'.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...