Jump to content

rhb1999

Members
  • Posts

    592
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rhb1999

  1. U.S. TR6s had 106 hp at introduction in 1969, but through almost heroic engineering kept 104 hp from the same basic engine during 1974-76 in the emissions era at a time when most imports lost as much as 1/3rd of their potency (i.e. MGB). The rest of the world got a 150 hp fuel-injected version through 1973 which was fairly finicky to keep in tune, and so it was detuned to 125 hp (still F.I.) in 1973.

    All of them were gorgeous.:cool:

    BTW, IMHO the lack of luxury amenities (automatic, power steering, etc.) only enhances the driving experience. It's fun because it's more difficult, not in spite of it. The similar cars that did come with automatics are dull, and usually suffer in interest and value.

    I can't agree with you more. I know what you mean by dull, I had a '72 VW super beetle with an automatic (I believe it's called the automatic stick shift) terrible acceleration, was not fun at all! Thanks for the info, I learn something new here all the time.
  2. Agree Dale. It is fun to see the other's lists. That is why I poked fun at Helfen - he is very knowledgeable and I am not surprised he pulled a car out of nowhere that I had completely forgotten about. If the list was say, 15 or so, I would definately have some more or less "real world" cars on it. I really think the '64 -'65 Mustang, for example, is one of the outstanding designs of the 60s, and I personally would have a plain jane over a later, big engined type model. It is the purest design, and still under $10K! 10 is really tough - the fun is you really have to think if you take it seriously. Where do you put that XK120 or '32 Ford 3 window, or Auburn Speedster...
    I agree the early Mustangs are good looking cars especially the fastback models, but I understand it was based on the Falcon.
  3. Steve, I agree with your statement of 55-57 Chevy because you see so many of them. When I look at a completely stock 55-57 Chevy and I look at all the GM line up for those three years I can't believe those Chevy's get more than they deserve. Possibly back when they were 5-10 years old they were the cheapest cars we could get a hold of with cheap performance parts caused the attraction, but my favorites now that I can take my prejudices away ( I was always a Pontiac fan/owner ), My favorites of the GM stable in those years are 1955 Buick Roadmaster, 1954-55 Olds Starfire, 1956 Olds and Buick, 1957 Cadillac Coupe deVille. A equally fine looking 1955-57 car is the Ford. Seems hard to believe to people today who always call the 57 Chevy The iconic car of those three years missed the facts that the people of 1957 thought the 57 Ford was a pretty darn good looking car too. The fact that Ford outsold Chevy in 1957 proves it. Don't get me wrong the tri five Chevy's are nice cars, but they're not the only cars out there.

    My vote when it comes to Porsches is a easy one for me, it's called the 904... any version will do. Flat four, flat six or flat eight. The car just looks like it's going fast....even while it's parked.

    D.

    I too have wondered about the '55-'57 Chevrolet popularity. Maybe it was because the grille on the '55 looked like one from a Ferrari (I read somewhere that the automotive press at the time criticized Chevrolet for copying it and that's reason the '56 got a conventional grille) Maybe it is the tail fins and trim on the '57. Or maybe it is the vast interchangeabilty of the Chevrolet small block V-8 parts and the horsepower potential or a combination of things. I like your list. One of my favorites, '57 Cadillac brougham.
  4. All I can say is, is that I've seen this jack in General Motors cars from the '80's, possibly late '70's on mid-sized RWD cars like Chevy Malibu, Pontiac Lemans/Bonneville Olds Cutlass, Buick Century/Regal. But, may have also been found in full size and FWD models.

  5. Rusty, I traded my car on some real estate in the early '70's and needed a car in a hurry. Bought a '68 Chevrolet Impala conv. with a 307 engine. It also had valve stem seal problems. A mechanic replaced them but told me it was a common problem on that engine and not to expect them to last. I did not keep it long and traded it off.

    The Chevrolet 307 replaced the 283 in '68. 283- '57-'67.

  6. The hardiest car I ever owned was a '81 Chevrolet Malibu 2-dr. coupe, bought new it had the Chevy 229 V6. 343,000 miles on the original timing chain. The V-8 option for the Monza was the 262, the smallest Chevy V-8 back then. I understand Chevrolet had considered V-8 powered Vega, a prototype was built? Never went to production. The slant six was a good engine, an uncle of mine had one for years, but only four main bearings? Chevrolet 250 L6 has seven mains.

×
×
  • Create New...