Jump to content

bryankazmer

Members
  • Posts

    1,325
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bryankazmer

  1. Tread design and compound are more important than bias vs radial construction for this question

     

    All season designs are generally, as you put it, good enough to get by.  If you select dry weather performance tires, you may also then need to switch to winter tires.  But this only makes sense if your car has the capabilities to use the increased performance in the summer. 

     

  2. I also ran third-party ISO17025-certified labs.  The new hand helds can have annual calibration to certified traceable standards.  I'm not saying that benchtops or spectros(what kind?) don't still have a place, just that handhelds are certainly now capable (if set up properly) of identifying alloys accurately.

  3. today hand-held Xray fluorescence or LIBS analyzers can do the composition in literally seconds - some scrap yards have these.

     

    I'm often surprised that people who can be very detailed about the width and color of a pin-stripe make no distinction between materials in categories as broad as "metal," "plastic," and "wood."

  4. 2 hours ago, Gearheadengineer said:

    Looks like a solid car at a fair price. I am not very familiar with these, so I have a question: does the seat upholstery look like something that would be original from 1955?

    Pattern looks right on the seats. Light sections of the door panels look odd. Folks on Packardinfo can say for sure.  The condition of the Ultramatic transmission and Torsion-Level suspension bear verification.  Some valve train noise is not unusual on these.

  5. Spar varnish is more flexible than ordinary varnish, and has some oil, usually linseed oil, in it.  It also has a high amount of UV absorber.  Epiphanes is a spar varnish, but uses tung oil.  I think that's the way to go.

    • Like 6
  6. 10 hours ago, Fossil said:

    I think it's pretty much a given that the seat upholstery isn't original but the car looks good and a buyer would probably prefer the seats in this car to ones that are split or torn. I know I would. 

     

    I feel the opposite - the buyer and seller are more likely to agree on price when they agree on the value/status of the interior.  Spiffy polyester job = excellent interior to some.

    • Like 2
  7. I partially agree with you - the brand lost most aspirational appeal.  But brand management is the OEM's job.  Buick did a much better job of repositioning, fueled by sales in China. 

     

    I'd say Cadillac's critical time was around 1973.  The enormous traditional Cadillac got its engine smogged and became a poor performer.  The Seville needed to be a bigger hit, although it was not a terrible first generation design.  The Cimmarron and 4-6-8 engine were horrid missteps.  Cadillac had about a 25 year run on top of their segment.  Currently they make their money on tarted up Chevy trucks

×
×
  • Create New...