Jump to content

Dosmo

Members
  • Posts

    830
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Dosmo

  1. For the sake of safety, I'd think about converting to a dual pot master cylinder.  As a daily driver in today's traffic, she's gonna have to mash that brake pedal pretty hard to whoa that thing down.  It's not a great experience to jam the brake pedal, and feel it go to the floor.  I've been there, done that.

     

    Great car, though.

  2. 9 minutes ago, Rusty_OToole said:

    Those do look like suspended pedals. If so, Playboy should get credit for a first. Up until now 1952 Ford was supposed to be first but Playboy had them 5 years earlier. Then again you could argue the Playboy was not a production car.

     

     

    Yeah, the Ford products from 1952 are supposed to be the first PRODUCTION cars with suspended pedals, I guess.  But, these appear to be the earliest ones I've seen - period -  on an American car.  Not familiar enough with foreign brands to know about them.

  3. It looks as though some of the Playboy cars used contemporary Mopar radios, distinctive due to their vertical configuration versus the more common horizontal type.  The speedometer/instrument cluster is tantalizingly familiar, but, so far, I can't figure it out.  I've attached three different images, and I wonder if a knowledgeable person,  such as Keiser31 or another like-minded expert, might recognize it almost instantly.

     

    Additionally, the clutch and brake pedal arrangement seem to suggest that this might be a suspended pedal setup, rather than the more common pedal through the floorboard type.  Were there any other Amurrican autos with suspended pedals at this time?  Thoughts? 

     

    Thanks in advance for your responses. 

    1948-Playboy-6.jpg

    1948Playboy_02_1000.jpg

    2531.jpg

  4. I really enjoyed the current issue of AACA magazine featuring the piece on the Playboy Automobile Corporation.  A lot of information about how the company was formed, how it tried to stay viable, and how it came to an end.  Several interesting photos, to boot.

     

    Cool stuff, if one is interested in such things.  I really like the magazine.

    • Like 1
  5. It appears to match up with the U.S. version of the 1961 Mercury Meteor.  I attached the below images after finding them at the curbside classic website.  Not familiar enough with Canadian cars to definitely say the car on your property is from the 1961 model year, but, I'm guessing 1961 to be correct.

    CC-20-063-800.jpg

    CC-20-068-800.jpg

  6. This is my favorite internet forum, by far.  But, the same rules apply here as anywhere.  Don't enter into a conversation if you aren't sure you're right.  Be prepared to have your remarks challenged by someone who doesn't agree.  Be prepared to hold your tongue when your remarks are challenged.  Arguments on this type of forum can cause current members to stay away, and can cause prospective members to consider looking elsewhere.

     

    If you ask a question that generates no responses, it probably means that no one on the forum is interested in the answer but you.  Don't take it personally.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  7. I found this photo on Facebook in the group "Motorology".  The text below accompanied the pic.

     

     

    Cadillac 1942 Pick-up . Only19 ex built, this one for a Las Vegas casino; Sold in an car auction in feb 1992 in Paris

     

    I have heard of the General building trucks on Buick chassis' from the late 1930s to early 1940s.  It seems like trucks of this sort were typically used as parts runners for the factories.  I have a feeling this vehicle might be a one-off not associated with the factory, at all.  But, since the post makes the claim that 19 were built, I wanted to throw this out to the forum and see what you guys have to say.

     

    Is this a factory built vehicle?

     

    26171818_1373321366129570_3797745714975417345_o.jpg

    • Like 1
  8. 6 minutes ago, Imperial62 said:

     

    What you are looking at, you may already know is a Special Coupe body.  I don't even remember seeing any of these in 1941, let alone 1942.  In 1941, the 2 door Sedanette was the new "gurl with the curl" car for Buick.  This body style was phased out.

     

      

    The day I made my post I was too lazy to go out in my garage to check my reference books.  Seeing your post, combined with my being somewhat more energetic today, prompted me to check out my Standard Catalog of American Cars 1805-1942.

     

    Under 1942 Buick Special Series 40-A, there is a 2-dr Utility Coupe, which I assume is akin to a business coupe.  It says 461 were produced for the 1942 model year.  I could have answered my own question, I guess.  I was probably hoping to spur some discussion about a little-seen unusual car, hoping that someone might post a photo of one in the flesh.  As usual, my efforts were not successful.

  9. 5 hours ago, Manuel said:

    Overland in front. Can't read what it says on the radiator.

    That is a big roadster behind.

     

    Manuel in Oz

    The large touring car in front has a script attached that says "Knoxville".  I'm pretty sure this photo was taken in Knoxville, Tennessee.

  10. Very interesting to hear of someone else who has an interest in the long wheelbase New Yorker Town & Country Station Wagons of 1951.  Just about any of the Chrysler wagons from 1951-54 are an uncommon sight, but the 51 NY is, by far, the most uncommon of any of these.

     

    I have a relative who formerly owned one for several years, though it was in need of restoration when he bought it in the early 1990s.  It spent most of its life in Nevada, and had been around the Fresno, CA area for some time when he got it.  He had been searching for one for some time when this car was listed in Hemmings Motor News.  It was a huge beast of a car.  He kept it for over 20 years before selling it a couple of years ago.

     

    I owned a 54 NY wagon during the 1990s - it was my daily driver for about a year.  I loved the car, though it had an appetite for gasoline.  It would easily keep up with modern traffic, but, the brakes were just not up to the task of stopping the heavy wagon quickly enough during rush hour.  I sold it in the late 1990s, and I now realize how lucky I was to have owned such a fine quality car.  It was a real head turner, though most of the locals didn't recognize it as a Chrysler.

     

    I can't tell you how many times people asked me how I liked driving that old Plymouth.

     

     

  11. Believe it or not, I read the complete article in the latest issue of HCC - that's not to say that I'm glad I did.  I wanted to see if I might be missing out on some compelling reason to care about these cars.

     

    If it was there, I missed it.

  12. Just about all of the present and past TV car collector/restoration shows have failed to hit the mark in some way.  Most have fallen dreadfully short of the mark, while others have seemed promising at times.  I have yet to watch multiple episodes of any show without encountering something that doesn't ring true, or strikes me as annoying.

     

    The thing is, I'd LOVE for one of these shows to be worth watching.  I'm more than willing to give these shows a chance because I don't have a cherished antique car sitting in my garage.  I do have a garage decorated with various items of automobilia, but that's all.  It is highly unlikely I will ever own another antique car, much to my disappointment.

     

    I've recently been watching a lot of YouTube videos.  Some of these have been really entertaining, but watching YouTube is nowhere near as user-friendly as using my cable TV remote to simply select a channel and pulling up the channel guide to see what's coming on in the next few hours.

     

    Will there ever be a car collector/restoration series on cable TV that is worth watching?  To this point, it doesn't seem all that promising.  But, I'll keep hoping and looking because I will still watch some of the incredibly irritating TV series on the Velocity Channel before I get desperate enough to watch the likes of programming choices offered on networks like ABC, NBC, CBS and FOX.  Those channels are dead to me, with the exceptions of some sports and news programming.

     

    The worst TV car show I can imagine would still be preferable to watching the likes of something like Two and a Half Men or one of those insufferable daytime shows like Dr. Phil or Jerry Springer.  

     

    And, regarding the show For The Love Of Cars, maybe I wouldn't like it if I had seen the entire episode.  Maybe I won't like some of the future episodes that will be broadcast.  In my earlier comment, I based my opinion on the last 20 or so minutes of the show.  I enjoyed the subject 1950 Land Rover, a car I've never seen featured on any other show.  I enjoyed that it appeared to have been restored to original specifications.  I enjoyed that the characters in the show, apparently from the U.K., appeared to be mature and thoughtful in their comments and actions.  

     

    All things considered, from the small sample I viewed, it seems - IN MY HUMBLE OPINION - better than just about any other series I've watched lately.  

     

    Man, this can be a tough crowd sometimes.

×
×
  • Create New...