Jump to content

yirgaman

Members
  • Posts

    355
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by yirgaman

  1. Phil, you wanted to know about the DK hucap, it has an 8 between the D and the B. The center of the wire wheel hubcaps look the same as wood, but the wood has the big bottom to fit over the ring on the wood wheel.

    I finally figured out how to do the attachments (I think)

    Larry

  2. Well, I've tried many times to attach a picture to my message, but each time I get a

    file transfer error. it's the split bumper (fender guard style ) like all the other DL's with a rear spare. I appologize for my lack of computer skills here, but the card reader konked out, and trying all the other options gets me to the transfer error.

    Larry

  3. I am selling this rear bumper from my DL6, it goes with the rear mounted spare. the bumper is not perfect - but it's pretty good. I really don't want to ship it and I'll be at hershey in the green field, spot numbers GBJ 38-39. I'm asking $350 for it and it includes the bumper brackets. cell phone number is 740 361-1838. I hope the picture attaches........

    Larry Yirga

  4. Sorry it has taken me so long to put my 2 cents in here, but I couldn't find my photo of my DK8 and DL6 for the bumper comparisons. I hope it's attached here someplace, I tried. I have looked through the Master Parts List book for Dodges and found there must be a dozen bumpers that were available for the rear of the cars, but the front had only 2 for the DL and 1 for the DK. The bumpers are listed in the accessories section and that matches with the options that were listed when the cars were sold new. Bumpers were extra cost, just like wheels.

    Larry

  5. Keiser, just for the record, your tailight lens is for a '33. The '32 has a tip at the top of the lens and the Dodge script is slightly different. The '33 lens will work in the 32 tailight but it slops around a little. I have only found two '32 lenses in 15 years of searching. But I did find several '33's. I'd send a picture, but I don't want to take my tailights apart right now.

    Larry

  6. Wow!, stealthBob I never expected brake pressures in that range......I suspected 200psi to 600 maybe. My guess is, if the switch isn't shorted (always closed) it may be useable.

    To Gene.......my brakes are all apart.. I wanted to check the switch before I put it all back together - the old switch was stuck or shorted out.

    Larry

  7. Thanks for your help Frank........I've passed the information along to the fellow (Ron). It didn't occur to me that it could be a Tillotson. These casting numbers and letters get hard to read after 70 or so years.

    Larry Yirga

  8. Ive met a fellow on line who has a '32 Dodge DL6 with a carburetor I've never heard of before. It's a "T MOTSON JRA" updraft. He's looking for some info on adjusting this thing, it's running too rich. Does anyone have any info on this particular carb?

    Larry

  9. thanks for the reply Martin. The wheel cylinders were leaking due to the rebuilder using NOS rubber cups (some were red colored), so I replaced all of them with the new rubber cups. My problem has been with the sealing around the copper washers and the brake lines themselves as they screw into the brass brake blocks at the wheel cylinders, I have not had any problem at the T-block on the rear axle???, just at the wheel cylinders. I agree that there seems to be a non-matching angle or other reason the brake line won't conform to the inside of the brake block. I think as I keep tightening, I cause a deformity inside the brass brake block - after that, nothing will work. I thought about using plumbers tape on the fittings, but my experiment in a jar of DOT5 shows a slow disolving of the plumbers tape over time - it becomes sticky and gooey. Copper may be a way out for the brake lines, I know it becomes brittle with vibration over time, but I don't drive this thing over 500 miles a year, and the long line at the rear is supported anyway.

    Larry

  10. I'm still trying to stop the brake fluid leaks on my '32. I have used all the suggestions given to me....new bolts, new washers, new fittings,new lines. I even went back to old fittings, and washers from the "other rear end". I know that when I put DOT 5 in the other Dodge, I had to re-tighten the lines tighter than with DOT3 that had been in the system, but I've been using DOT5 for 5 years in that car with no problems. The only thing I didn't change is the wheel cylinders - these have been re-built professionaly, but not sleeved because they were within specs and not pitted.

    Has no one else ever ran into this?

    Larry

  11. Am I the only person in the world who can't make the switch to DOT5? I have been going around and around with the brakes on my '32 DK Dodge. The biggest problem is at the rear brake wheel cylinders. I have tightened the brake block bolts into the wheel cylinder so tight that I have distorted the wall in the cylinder, and the fluid still leaks out around the washers. I've tightend the lines into the block to the point of distorting the fitting, and still get leaks around the fitting on both sides of the car. I have used new copper washers, different thickness washers, new bolts, new block fittings,I even went to and old '32 rear axle and reused all the old parts including old washers - still got leaks. I'm on my fourth attempt at bending new lines to start all over again. I tighten the things snug at first, then gently increase the tightness each time I find a leak, so I'm not overtightening immediately.

    I really want to use DOT 5, and it worked out great on my other '32 Dodge, been driving it for 5 years with no problem. I'm open to suggestions

    Larry

×
×
  • Create New...