Jump to content

bryankazmer

Members
  • Posts

    1,322
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bryankazmer

  1. On 9/8/2022 at 10:41 PM, mcdarrunt said:

    Stick an LS in it and have a ball. We have a former Jag V12 convertible in the shop right now getting the LS treatment and one of the most fun was an MGB with a 400 sbc. Figured the puny rear end would give up but it outlasted every right sized tire on the place. Finally pulled engine/trans and gave it to the chaplain at a nearby prison that needed parts. Only complaint on sbc in XJ's was they no longer leaked oil and driveways got rusty.

    I've driven a Jag V12 and a Chevy 350 as daily drivers.  They were equal in dependability, albeit not in cost of repairs.  The Jag was a much better road car.  Buy a Chevy if you want a car that drives like a Chevy.

    • Like 1
  2. This is a "modern" example (1980's).  Supplier of color-matched parts called on the carpet at OEM assembly plant because the parts didn't match the cars' paint.  Turned out that the parts matched the master standard - the OEM's production paint did not match their own master.

     

    The comment from 1937 is not BS - illumination affects how color is perceived.  That's why matching is done in a light booth under various specified and controlled lamps.

  3. steven, this is not the right forum for your question (look at one of the pinned posts above and you can see what Classic Car means here.  try General or Ford forum.  The Capri has enough trim differences from the Mustang to tell by looking at them.

    • Like 1
  4. First, I like LaSalles, Roadmasters, Packard 120's, Hudson Eights, Cadillac 61's, Chrysler Town and Countries.  I can see both the arguments for inclusion and exclusion. I was solicited for feedback recently too.

     

    It seems to me that the current, redrawn "line" is rather arbitrary and rather GM-biased.  If the straight 8 LaSalle and the Cadillac 61 is now the level of car that's in, there are many others that are comparable.  Likewise, postwar Cadillac vs Packard cut-offs seems a bit odd.

     

    Class judging can accommodate both more and less exclusive cars by judging them in different classes - marque clubs do this all the time.  And CCCA meets are quite nice (to me) by having none of the "rods and used Corvettes" clutter.

     

    I also agree with Matt H that this is not the key to increasing membership.

  5. Your basic description of how the extinguisher works is right, your chemistry description not quite.  Both oxidation and the interruption of the combustion reaction are chemical reactions.  K+ is a cation, the free radical has an electron added, not subtracted.  Plasticizer and resin are different things, you add plasticizer to a resin to solvate and soften it.

     

    But, the point is that there is real chemistry behind these extinguishers.  Has anyone actually used one yet?

    • Like 2
  6. On 7/13/2022 at 10:29 AM, 58L-Y8 said:

    Yes! Even the owner of a factory delivered priced $995 1937 LaSalle sport coupe has a Full Classic...just like those custom-bodied Duesenberg J owners!

    My issue is if the $995 LaSalle is in, what about the many other vehicles in that price range?  Pick your favorite thousand dollar depression era car and make your case.  Very tough area to draw a line.

    • Like 1
  7. This is a lot of misinformation around this. 

    First, neither paper, cardboard nor typical polyethylene/polypropylene films degrade appreciably in a typical landfill. There have been a number of studies on this, the anaerobic conditions prevent it.  So the amount of landfill trash generated depends on the initial volume of the packaging.

     

    Paper and cardboard do degrade faster than PE/PP as litter.

     

    There are plastics which will degrade under moist aerobic conditions, like paper does.  They are not as clear as PE or PP but I don't think that's a big deal in this case.

     

    Mixed composition (paper and plastic bonded together) are the hardest to recycle.

  8. The trunk trim and the bumpers are Packard parts, but they bolt in the same holes whether junior or senior.  The small taillights are 110/120 - they can be interchanged also, but one would upgrade rather than downgrade if switching.  The ribbed dash plastic and the mostly plastic radio screen are 110/120.  The hood side trim is Henney.  There are no side scripts on the hood, as Packard used (the font matches the trunk).  Both the Packard senior and junior trims are different from this side piece, the emblem is at the forward edge.

     

    I believe in an earlier go-round on this car someone said the engine is a 282.  That's the 120 mill.

    There are two possibilities that I see.

    1)  The car is a 120 with other trim added later. This has been done before.  The sidemount cover is Packard not Henney. Most of the front clip might even be off a Henney professional car as a repair.

    2) The car could be a Henney-modified 120.  Henney had the exclusive contract for Packard-based professional cars.  Henney did mix senior and junior trim on some cars, usually by doing the easy bolt ons. I've seen a hearse done that way.  If so one would expect there to be a Henney body tag.  It would certainly be odd to do this to a coupe, so I think the first option is more likely.

     

    I see it as a decent 120 coupe that needs a left fender.  And that's not bad.

     

     

    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
  9. 4 minutes ago, Leif in Calif said:

    I thought that might be the same car too, but the one just posted has side mounts on both sides. Apparently Albuquerque is a hot bed of '41 Packard Coupes! 

    120 with 160 bumpers and Henney hood trim, never showing the left fender with the tool box - looks like the same car to me

×
×
  • Create New...