Jump to content

Doug Novak

Members
  • Posts

    307
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Doug Novak

  1. 25 minutes ago, John_S_in_Penna said:

     

    I don't know whether anyone knows that for sure, yet.

    Back in Posting #169 (and a few following it), "Dynaflash8"

    was pondering that point too.  He's a former national

    President of the AACA.

     

    It might boil down to what is trademarked, and how;

    and how conciliatory the two parties are regarding the name.

    Maybe someone can tell more.

     

    Just opening another can of worms we don't need right now, nor would it accomplish anything other then broadening the distance between the Club and Museum. We all get that we a two separate entities regardless, but the General Public would not understand why we would demand a name change. The Museum exists because of the Club and should be thought of as our Museum regardless of who's running it. Leave our name on it.

    • Like 2
  2. 1 hour ago, Bhigdog said:

    I've spoken to two officials of the AACA at length. There is no reason to go into our conversations chapter and verse but here is my take away.                

     

    The AACA feels it has done it's best but admits things could have been handled better.

    The Club and Museum rupture is a done deal.

    We will be getting the Clubs position on this only from the clubs view point.

     

    Here is my opinion on the subject:

    On one hand the monies and efforts provided to the Museum is just plain gone. On the other hand it has produced a world class car museum.

    Egos and personalities have played a noticeable role in the situation and continue to do so. (no surprise there)

    Unless we were a fly on the wall we will never know the real and full story uncolored by bias and opinion. (except for our own)

    We will be getting the Clubs version via magazine article. Believe it in whole or part as you wish.

    In the whole scheme of things this is just another garden variety tempest in a tea pot.

    It's time to  just say "the Hell with it" and move on.

    My hope is that this whole debacle will serve as a learning lesson to the AACA that timely disclosure of AACA policy or changes  can only be the best policy.

    Another member suggested the publication of a synopsis of the board meetings should be initiated, Sounds good to me................Bob Beck

     

     

     

    I have to say I agree with Bob, it's time to move on.  I do find the whole string of posts, and string of events, to be interesting, but don't see it resolving things. Not much more to be said about it. Time to stop the Blame Game, what ever happens next won't really change the good things we all get out of being Members of the Club. The Museum isn't going to suffer much from it either, which is OK as far as I'm concerned, and the Club will get a New HQ, Library and Research Center bigger and better, no doubt about it. Everything else is water under the bridge. It's a new day.

    • Like 2
  3. 7 hours ago, Doug Novak said:

    Hope in the end everything works out for all, but are we possibly spinning our wheels? Do we have an alternate direction to follow which can also indicate what can be done to establish a new HQ, Library and Research Facility, with potential Cost to Build, and a time line, somewhere other then the Museum Grounds?

     

    Worst case, what happens if we put the expansion on the back burner, stay put and possibly have a remote location near the existing HQ, for ware housing the over flow donations which could be cataloged and retrievable upon request?

     

    To have an alternate plan might help relax the the current situation knowing life can go on with out the Museum's involvement. It might be more cost effective as well. Just something to think about.

     

    Hmmm......no response, I guess that answers my questions.

  4. Hope in the end everything works out for all, but are we possibly spinning our wheels? Do we have an alternate direction to follow which can also indicate what can be done to establish a new HQ, Library and Research Facility, with potential Cost to Build, and a time line, somewhere other then the Museum Grounds?

     

    Worst case, what happens if we put the expansion on the back burner, stay put and possibly have a remote location near the existing HQ, for ware housing the over flow donations which could be cataloged and retrievable upon request?

     

    To have an alternate plan might help relax the the current situation knowing life can go on with out the Museum's involvement. It might be more cost effective as well. Just something to think about.

    • Like 1
  5. 1 hour ago, Joe in Canada said:

    I for one due hope that Hemming's will correct their righting's and publicize in the same manner as their original article. Some of their righting's points put the club in a harsh light.   

     

    I went back into the Hemmings Forum and added the information that the Land offer from the Museum to AACA National was not "for free" in that there were monetary conditions attached to the offer that AACA would have to agree to.

    • Like 2
          • Hi I'm jumping in for the first time but have been following and contributing to the Blog on Hemmings about this subject. Here is what I want to mention here.

            I learned that the Museum offered, at no cost to the Club, 3 Acres of land next to the AACA Museum 3 months ago, as a sight for a new HQ, Library and Research Center. 

            Doesn’t it seem that under the current situation, that if the offer still stands, why not accept the Land offer and start planning the move to the Property next to the Museum?

            The new HQ, Library and Research Center next to the Museum, and where AACA Hershey Region’s Club building already exists, would form a huge Campus environment that sounds fantastic.

            The other issues should be secondary and addressed later, or it will be difficult to move forward with resolving the original problem, which is the Headquarters, Library and Research Center are out of room needs to move.  The original AACA HQ Building looks to be a valuable asset and if sold could pay towards the cost of the new Building.

            Am I the only one seeing this opportunity?

            Doug Novak, New Freedom, Pa.

             

            Update:  the Land offer from the Museum to AACA National was not "for free" in that there were monetary conditions attached to the offer that AACA would have to agree to.

            •  

               
    1. HQ,  months ago
    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...