Jump to content

nzcarnerd

Members
  • Posts

    7,773
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by nzcarnerd

  1. The car with Gottlieb Daimler on board looks to be the original Daimler car of 1886.

    The wire wheel car below it is a Benz Velo I think - Benz's first 'small' car!

    The 'dos-a-dos' Panhard pic dates from about 1891. These early Panhards had gears but not in a box! This wwas the first car to use the 'Panhard system' as most later cars did with an engine in front, gearbox behind and final drive behind that. The Daimler Phoenix engine has hot tube ignition and takes quite a long time to start from cold. The last one - the rear-engined 'vis-a-vis' might be a DeDion-Bouton from about 1899.

  2. Re Tex-Riv' serial number plate. McFarlan only made about 3500 cars in 18 years. Number 513 would be fairly early in the run - maybe mid-teens? Odd that I have found no mention of a model 69 though. The early ones were model 127,137,147 etc. Maybe you need to compare it with the plate on a surviving car? These cars had very big engines about 9.3 litres and built - I think - by Teetor.

  3. I don't think it is either a Dagmar or a Hudson. The body has a Hudson look about it but this car has front wheel brakes and Hudson didn't get them until 1927 by which time they had moved on from this style of body. Dagmar had an angular radiator - like an exaggerated Willys-Knight - and this car's is rounded. The hood on this car is too short for Hudson and the profile of the front fender doesn't match. I don't know what it is - perhaps it is from one of the more conservative makers - Stearns-Knight for example? Otherwise it is an older car retro-fitted with four wheel brakes. It is on a very long wheelbase so is something expensive when new.

  4. I presume this is a British-built T - and also a long-wheelbase commercial chassis? I wonder if they had the same appearance changes as the US models. If not it could be later than it looks.

  5. Echo Robert, it might help to know if your car is a GE or a GL. I think I am right in that the GE has the wings on headlights, sidelights and radiator cap but the GL doesn't (?). I have a third series GE Regal sedan myself which is more correctly called a 1928 1/2 I think, but is registered as a 1929 car. It was sold new here in NZ in March 1929 so must have been built in 1928 - there may even have been overlapping of production of various models? Studebakers of that late 1920s era are very confusing when it comes to dating them. Comment from Mark Huston perhaps - I think you know as much about this era as anyone from what I have read.

  6. I agree it doesn't look big enough to be a Doble - the wheelbase was 142". As far as I know there was only one Doble roadster built - by Murphy - a car which I think survives on the US west coast somewhere. Those are not Doble wheels.

  7. The radiator of this car does bear a resemblance to that on the Studebaker Special Six of around 1925-26 but it was not 'veed' at the bottom and this car is looks to be earlier than that - more like 1918-1920 I think.

  8. A quick google image search shows some Holsmans dated as early as 1902 but The Standard Catalog gives 1903 as the first date of them. It seems to be quite common to find early cars given impossibly early dates in the early days of the old car hobby.

  9. Looking at this picture again, I reckon that the wheelbase of this car is not as much as 118". The Standard Catalog lists a 35/40hp roadster on a 108" wheelbase for 1907-08 which I think is more likely. I is conceivable that they could have put a big engine into a shorter chassis as a special order.

×
×
  • Create New...