Jump to content

MrFreeze

Members
  • Posts

    65
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MrFreeze

  1. 4 hours ago, RivNut said:

    Here’s a list from the ROA’s website that shows equivalent tire sizes. The chart is incomplete because it only shows one tire size for 1963.  Refer to the 1964 line for the same info for 1963. It also show an 8.85 tire for 1965 which is incorrect.  The larger tires in 63, 64, and 65 were for the heavier Electras.

     

    https://rivowners.org/features/Ev_Stats/dimensions.html

     

     

    Good info, thanks.  I always forget to check the ROA for info, but when I do, they nearly always have something helpful.

     

    MrFreeze

  2. 6 hours ago, Barney Eaton said:

    Attached is a chart (powerdog.com) that compares different sizes mentioned above.  

    In a reference book, it said 1963 & 64 Rivieras came with 7.10 x 15 and 1965, 66, 67 came with 8.45 x 15 

    consulting another chart .. found one that said 7.10 x 15 converted to a 225/75r15   and a different chart did not show 

    the 7.10 size but had 8.45 X 15 converted to 225/75 r 15 so there may have been a tire industry change in designations. 

    Gene above said he liked the 205 because of the shorter sidewall, note the 225/70 sidewall is only 1/10 inch taller and the 235 is 1/10 shorter.

    When you use powerdog,  the first tire you enter should be your base as all the other are compared to the first entry. 

     

    Specification Sidewall Radius Diameter Circumference Revolutions Speedometer Odometer Difference
    225/75-15 6.6" 14.1" 28.3" 88.9" 713/mi 60MPH 10000mi N/A
    205/75-15 6.1" 13.6" 27.1" 85.2" 744/mi 63MPH 10436mi -4.2%
    225/70-15 6.2" 13.7" 27.4" 86.1" 736/mi 62MPH 10323mi -3.1%
    235/65-15 6.0" 13.5" 27.0" 84.9" 746/mi 63MPH 10466mi -4.5%

    h

     

    Very helpful, thank you.

     

    MrFreeze

  3. 7 hours ago, Seafoam65 said:

    I've had two different sets of 225-75-15 tires on my car with no rubbing

    I take it this is on a '65 Riv?  I "assume" the '64 and '65 have the same amount of room inside the fenders.  Would you happen to know what wheels you are running, or what the backspace is?

     

    Thanks,

    MrFreeze

  4. 16 hours ago, atencioee said:

    I like my 205/75R15s...Gives it a little lower look. Currently have 895s on my 64 with spacers.

    That's what I have on the car now, but they are just a little small for my taste.

     

    What size spacer do you have on the front?

     

    MrFreeze

  5. The car has 1-1/2" spacers on the rear wheel compliments of the previous owner.  On the front, excess fins have been not-so-gently removed from the aluminum drums.  Wheels appear to seat properly and clear the suspension with no issues.

     

    Interesting to hear you had rub with stock rims at 225/70R15.  Any chance you had tired/saggy front springs contributing to the issue?  What was the original tire size on these cars?

     

    Appreciate the input.  Unfortunately, it looks like Goodyear no longer offers any tires in either of my 2 preferred sizes, unless you count trailer tires.

     

    Best regards,

    MrFreeze

  6. Turbinator has supplied me with some restored wheels for my '64 (15 x 6 #895).  Now I need to select tires.  I was considering 225/75R15, but I have heard they may rub, and that 225/70R15 is a better choice.  Anyone out there running either of these sizes that can provide real-world input?  I am also planning on running blackwalls, as I think they would look better given this car's paint scheme.  Anybody want to recommend a particular tire for a fair-weather cruiser?  Either way I'm sure it will be a challenge finding good tires in 15" diameter these days.

     

    Some pics for inspiration:

    image.jpeg.329395bd2a05303f7d081c6c0815e37a.jpeg

     

    image.jpeg.26741c7474bc4a446561a25fd8cf3157.jpeg

     

    Appreciate any input you folks may have.

     

    MrFreeze

  7. 3 hours ago, RivNut said:

    50/50 is fine ne but don’t buy the mix. Water is basically free; why pay for it?

    Distilled water is about $2 per gallon at my local grocery stores.  Less than coolant, for sure, but it makes the convenience of purchasing pre-mixed just a BIT more attractive.

     

    MrFreeze

  8. 14 hours ago, NTX5467 said:

     I also remember looking at the internal water jacket (cylinder head) flows on early 19  60s Chevy cylinder heads (maybe even 1955 265s?) in the design-tweaking process.  As the flow corridors were fine-tuned to decrease turbulance and related hot spots in the heads.  Of course, higher flow rates would make such turbulent areas more harmful, I suspect. 

    That's very interesting.  The effectiveness of fluid transfer depends on a few different things, but one of them is the Reynolds number, which is a function of viscosity and velocity.  Low Reynolds numbers result in "laminar" flow, and are not very good for heat transfer.  Increasing the velocity (which increases Reynolds number) will move you out of the laminar flow range and into the turbulent area, which is much better for heat transfer.  The part of the heat transfer this helps with is crossing the "boundary layer" between the cylinder casting and the fluid itself, which is one of the main areas of concern when trying to make fluid heat transfer work (fluid heat capacity and conductive resistance of the cylinder material are the other big contributors).

     

    If you really got the water shooting fast through the irregularly shaped castings, you might be able to cause some stagnant zones where the water just sits in place.  I doubt you could ever get to those kinds of velocities in a car engine, though.  Our water pumps just don't move that much.

     

    Something to consider: there are many options for high flow water pumps out there (I have a Flow Kooler on one of my cars), but I have never seen any low flow water pumps.

     

    I HAVE heard of people inadvertently slowing down their water pump by installing underdrive pulleys, and then having overheating issues at idle and low rpm.

     

    It is also helpful to consider the fan, which does exactly the same thing as the water pump: it moves a cooler fluid (i.e. air, and to heat transfer engineers a fluid is a substance which takes the shape of the container it is put into, so air is considered a fluid) against something hotter that we want to cool off (the contents of the radiator).  I have seen many overheating issues that were traced back to insufficient airflow (usually a retrofitted electric fan), but never heard of one that was the result of too much airflow.   Would you try to solve an overheating issue by using a smaller fan?  Seems counterintuitive, because it is.  More flow of cooling media is nearly always better, until you get up to limits you can't feasibly achieve with a 60 year old car.

     

    Interesting topic for me (obviously; sorry for long-windedness of this reply), but probably not for many others.

     

    Best regards,

    MrFreeze

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  9. 19 hours ago, NTX5467 said:

    but such can cause the water to travel through the engine too quickly, not picking up enough heat.  So high-capacity pumps can work opposite than suspected to work.

    As a professional heat transfer engineer I can 100% assure you that this is not a thing.  The higher the fluid velocity is, the better the heat transfer is (pressure drop also increases exponentially, so very high flow rates do become a case of diminishing returns).  If you could get the flow high enough that you cause stagnant areas in the engine or radiator, you might start to lose some performance.  But that is not feasible in a car engine.

     

    Best regards,

    MrFreeze

    • Like 2
  10. Tom, thanks for the info.  The large nipple was plumbed to the STV in my car - one of many vacuum lines that had been connected to the wrong place.

     

    Are the STV valves rebuildable/replaceable?  How about the modulators?

     

    MrFreeze

  11. I am trying to unscramble and repair the HVAC vacuum lines in my '64 with AC.  So far I have found a couple of broken lines, and several that were connected to the wrong place.  I am using the factory service manual for guidance, and replacing all the lines with new vacuum tubing after adding the proper paint stripes for identification.

     

    My issue is: the service manual schematic does not show the line that runs to the suction throttle valve (STV) on the freon suction line (schematic from manual below).  The operational description of the STV shows a vacuum line running from the suction modulator to the STV.  I assume the suction modulator is pictured below.  I further assume that I need to connect from the big nipple to the STV, and the little nipple would connect to the same vacuum source as the rest of the HVAC controls.  If all my assuming is correct, I plan to put a tee in the right hand black line between the heater adapter and the AC adapter and connect it to the little nipple.

     

    Before I do all this, can anyone who has been down this road confirm that my assuming is correct?  Or straighten me out if it is not?  Bonus points if you can tell me what color stripe (if any) these 2 vacuum lines should have.

     

    Thanks in advance for sharing your knowledge and experience,

    MrFreeze.

    Vacuum schematic.jpg

    Vacuum modulator.jpg

  12. On 7/4/2023 at 2:56 PM, Zimm63 said:

    Problem with the lighter working is likely the fuse that screws onto the base.  Not sure of any source for a replacement.  

     

    Zimm63, I don't see a fuse screwed into the base of my lighter.  It looks like this (pic below).  The bottom end does not seem to want to come apart.  Is there a replaceable fuse in there?  How can I get at it to check?  I have power to the connecting wiring, but no power through the base, so a burned fuse would make sense.  Please advise...

     

    Thanks for your help,

    MrFreeze

     

     

    Lighter.jpg

  13. BulldogDriver, would you happen to have a model or part number for the USB outlet you used?

     

    Riviera63, looks like '63 and '64 used a different front ashtray arrangement, but at any rate, that space is currently filled by an aftermarket cruise control. 

     

    Thanks for the input.

     

    MrFreeze

  14. I am interested in removing the non-working cigarette lighter from the rear of the console and replacing it with a hardwired USB receptacle.  The hole in the console is 0.9 inches, but all the USB outlets I can find are over 1" in diameter.  Anybody know of an outlet that will fit the original hole?  I don't want to hog it out any bigger - plan B would be to replace the lighter with a working used one (assuming I can find one) and plug an adapter in there when I need it.  If you happen to have a working lighter you want to get rid of, let me know in case this doesn't pan out.

     

    Thanks, guys.

     

    MrFreeze

  15. 31 minutes ago, bewemo said:

    To resolve the control cable issue, it would be best to consult with a local automotive parts store or contact the manufacturer or dealership for your specific vehicle make and model. They should be able to provide you with the correct replacement cable or guide you to a reliable source. For the broken vacuum line, using generic vacuum tubing from a parts store should be fine as long as it matches the appropriate size and specifications. It's a common practice to replace vacuum lines with generic tubing. However, to ensure the best fit and compatibility, it's advisable to bring a sample of the broken line to the parts store for accurate sizing. While you have everything apart, it's a good opportunity to inspect other components related to the AC and heating system. Check for any signs of wear or damage and consider replacing any worn-out parts. Additionally, inspecting and cleaning the HVAC filters, checking the coolant levels, and inspecting the blower motor and fan assembly can help ensure optimal performance of your AC and heating system. If you're unsure about any specific repairs or maintenance tasks, it's always recommended to consult with a qualified automotive technician or refer to the vehicle's service manual for detailed instructions and guidance.

    You sure sound like a robot...

  16. 25 minutes ago, RivNut said:

    If your gauges are not at eye level and you can’t keep one eye on the gauges and the other on the road, gauges are a waste of time. Idiot lights come on quickly and they catch your attention. Or maybe you have a 3rd eye in your knee cap.😎

    I don't have that 3rd eye, and I also disagree, but I hope we can still be friends!

     

    MrFreeze

  17. 15 hours ago, RivNut said:

    The temp sending unit is in the head at the front on the right side.  There is only one head casting, it’s interchangeable on both sides so you’ll find the same port on the back of the left head. You only have to be concerned that the temperature is the same at the rear of the engine as it is at the front. It can be made to accept either an electric gauge or a mechanical one.  

    That's very useful info, thank you.

     

    MrFreeze

×
×
  • Create New...