Guest imported_moopar2ya2 Posted February 22, 2004 Share Posted February 22, 2004 Can any one please tell me what kind of grief I would get into if I tried to convert my 47 manual to a Dynaflow? What about a hydramatic? I would like to retain the option to put the car right again.Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mrbuick714 Posted February 22, 2004 Share Posted February 22, 2004 47 did not offer Dynaflow. You would run into engine mounts and a number of other problems.The only way I would want to tackle a situation such as this would be to have a donor car with everything I needed,and then I am not sure about transfering engine mounts from one frame to the other. BCA 2399 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Phillips Posted February 23, 2004 Share Posted February 23, 2004 With Dynaflow, you will have much less power from the engine, since Dynaflow robs its power tremendously, a much slower, less responsive, more sluggish car, and a virtual guarantee that the Dynaflow will leak fluid on your garage floor and down your torque tube. Why would you ever want to switch to Dynaflow, unless you are doing constant stop-and-go commuter driving with your '47?Pete Phillips, BCA #7338 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest imported_moopar2ya2 Posted February 23, 2004 Share Posted February 23, 2004 "Why would you ever want to switch to Dynaflow" Kinda hilly where I live, plus then maybe the wife can drive it. I know the Dynaflow wasn't optimal that's why I also wondered about the hydramatic, I thought maybe someone made a conversion in the "olden days" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now