Steve_Mack_CT Posted February 6, 2023 Posted February 6, 2023 Seems like a decent deal to me but definately has a lot of needs. Not my usual area but I just find these full size Pontiacs cool. https://longisland.craigslist.org/cto/d/southampton-1966-pontiac-catalina/7582686227.html 3
The 55er Posted February 6, 2023 Posted February 6, 2023 They are cool. This one shows potential but needs full cosmetics & interior work. Great drivers too but the scary part is what might be underneath the rear window in that lower vinyl top area. Most had water leaks there that ran over the wheel tubs and rotted the trunk floors. Salt belt car so a careful pre-purchase inspection is required including the rear quarters, especially behind the rear wheels. 4
Reynard Posted February 7, 2023 Posted February 7, 2023 Steve...how about taking the time to post a picture or two?...save everybody a lot of time. thanks 2
Steve_Mack_CT Posted February 7, 2023 Author Posted February 7, 2023 5 minutes ago, Reynard said: Steve...how about taking the time to post a picture or two?...save everybody a lot of time. thanks I usually do but was a bit pressed today as I was sneaking a little forum time in between working. Not a bad looking car huh,? 1
Fossil Posted February 9, 2023 Posted February 9, 2023 16 minutes ago, EmTee said: What it could be... That sure is purdy.
Rivguy Posted February 9, 2023 Posted February 9, 2023 These are good looking cars from the period when Pontiac still had their mojo. Look at that underhood shot! All that room! No power brakes or air but looks like power steering. It's not a 2+2 which was a higher line model with buckets, console and the 429 engine. Still this could be a real nice car. Rust around the windows? A common problem with this era GM cars. I had a couple of '66-'67 Rivieras that suffered from that. The only cure is to strip everything down, cut out the rust and weld in new metal. If you're not prepared to do this you're never going to have a nice car. I never committed to the expense of repair, and Mickey Moused it with sealing gunk and even duct tape. Hey, at least it was silver, just like the stainless window mouldings! Not my proudest achievement, but i kept it in good mechanical shape.
B Jake Moran Posted February 9, 2023 Posted February 9, 2023 Test drives must be cash in hand. Hhmmm can you imagine handing him $5500 cash and saying “thanks I’ll be back after my test drive”. You get back and go “naw” I’ll pass. He hands you back your $5500 cash?? I think he starts making a deal. 1
The 55er Posted February 9, 2023 Posted February 9, 2023 Seller states in Craigslist ad it has a 389 engine. For the record there were no 428 Pontiac engines until 1967. 1
EmTee Posted February 10, 2023 Posted February 10, 2023 These cars were mechanically bulletproof. The 389/THM-400 combination, even with the 2 BBL carburetor provides plenty of power. Our family had one in the darker blue color when I was a kid. My father added the skirts, which I didn't care for at the time, but now think really completes that lower body line that runs through the rear wheel opening.
edinmass Posted February 10, 2023 Posted February 10, 2023 Cool car, but I can’t help remembering when they were 200 dollars all day long. I’m getting old!
HarperAutos Posted February 10, 2023 Posted February 10, 2023 It’d be nice to actually see some pictures
The 55er Posted February 10, 2023 Posted February 10, 2023 Pictures will show an ugly neglected car that needs full cosmetics. Don't get your hopes up.
B Jake Moran Posted February 12, 2023 Posted February 12, 2023 On 2/10/2023 at 7:07 AM, edinmass said: Cool car, but I can’t help remembering when they were 200 dollars all day long. I’m getting old! Exactly! I looked at one for a daily in the 80's for $400. I drove a 1963 Grand Prix to trade school in 1997-1998. I went to Texas to get it. True, the 389 was a solid reliable power plant. Here is my issue, kind of personal. The 63-64's were smooth and conservative, with honest Pontiac styling and cues. The 65-67's got those lower body and more exaggerations of curving which kind of looked cartoonish, compared to the 64's especially. 1964 Full Size Pontiac above. 1
arcticbuicks Posted February 12, 2023 Posted February 12, 2023 (edited) the USA Pontiacs sure had some odd size engines and choice of larger i guess,we only had pretty much all 283 CI in the 65 Pontiacs....if not a inline 6 Edited February 12, 2023 by arcticbuicks (see edit history)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now