Xander Wildeisen 2,177 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 https://www.autoevolution.com/news/jaguar-e-type-reimagined-as-1960s-suv-154594.html Link to post Share on other sites
3macboys 506 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 I suppose for the same people who like their Porsche to look like this: But to me both are just wrong 3 Link to post Share on other sites
AURktman 202 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 Looks at calendar 😏 Hmmm... Jan 17th, not April 1st. A bit soon, don't ya think? 1 Link to post Share on other sites
capngrog 884 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 I think the multi-door Porsche looks pretty good; the "re-imagined" Jaguar E-Type, not so much (I'm being charitable here). Cheers, Grog 4 Link to post Share on other sites
Mark Huston 490 Posted January 17 Share Posted January 17 It proves once again that not everyone can, or should, design cars. 2 Link to post Share on other sites
joe_padavano 1,871 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Just because someone has Photoshop doesn't mean that they should use it. And sorry, but "Porsche truck", "Alfa Romeo truck", "Maserati truck", "Mustang truck", etc are all oxymorons. 3 Link to post Share on other sites
nickelroadster 214 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 It looks very pregnant. I hope it doesn't give birth anytime soon. Link to post Share on other sites
GregLaR 2,551 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Good Heavens! Just because you can, doesn't mean... Unless maybe they ordered a fleet of these Jagwagons, cut the roofs off and used them as part of a bizarre safari type tourist ride where they could cruise around their former colonies to show other colossal British failures. A catchy name name like "The Dick Rowe Memorial Safari Ride" might help. Link to post Share on other sites
CarlLaFong 501 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 2 hours ago, Xander Wildeisen said: https://www.autoevolution.com/news/jaguar-e-type-reimagined-as-1960s-suv-154594.html 3 Link to post Share on other sites
SC38DLS 1,746 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 The e-type was the most beautiful car Enzo Ferrari ever saw. Thank goodness he never saw this one. It’s butt ugly! dave s 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Xander Wildeisen 2,177 Posted January 18 Author Share Posted January 18 15 minutes ago, CarlLaFong said: That is the E-type P1800 Vega wagon family truckster. Also available in antarctic blue. Link to post Share on other sites
1937hd45 3,264 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Castration will solve the problem of second generation car designs from that family. 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Xander Wildeisen 2,177 Posted January 18 Author Share Posted January 18 39 minutes ago, GregLaR said: Good Heavens! Just because you can, doesn't mean... Unless maybe they ordered a fleet of these Jagwagons, cut the roofs off and used them as part of a bizarre safari type tourist ride where they could cruise around their former colonies to show other colossal British failures. A catchy name name like "The Dick Rowe Memorial Safari Ride" might help. needs a visor. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
padgett 2,262 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Dymaxion by DAF ? Link to post Share on other sites
8E45E 1,296 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Harold Radford would have built it for a wealthy client, if that is what they had in mind. Radford made a few Aston Martin DB5 Shooting Brakes in 1966: 1966 Aston Martin DB6 Mk I Shooting Brake by Radford | Monterey 2015 | RM Sotheby's Craig Link to post Share on other sites
capngrog 884 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 ARRRRGGHHHH, I kinda like it. What is happening to me? Where's the antidote? Ahh, good ol ' single malt to the rescue again! Cheers, Grog 2 1 Link to post Share on other sites
bryankazmer 304 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Harold? yes, Maude 1 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
plymouthcranbrook 1,063 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Mummmmm..... No Link to post Share on other sites
John Bloom 289 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 58 minutes ago, bryankazmer said: Harold? yes, Maude Well if you want to say yes say yes....and if you want to say no say no.... Link to post Share on other sites
GregLaR 2,551 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 1 hour ago, capngrog said: ARRRRGGHHHH, I kinda like it. What is happening to me? Where's the antidote? Ahh, good ol ' single malt to the rescue again! Cheers, Grog Having owned one Jag before, I think I've learned my lesson, but I'm with you Grog; I'd drive this little hearse Jag in a heartbeat! 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Xander Wildeisen 2,177 Posted January 18 Author Share Posted January 18 In a heartbeat? Or in a flat line? 1 2 Link to post Share on other sites
Scott Bonesteel 98 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 If my King's English is correct, taking it from a two-door coupe to a four-door makes it a 'saloon', which is where it looks like it was designed, after a wee dram or two...As noted above, just because you can doesn't mean you should. 3 Link to post Share on other sites
Restorer32 2,108 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Blasphemy. Link to post Share on other sites
58L-Y8 1,889 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 In the design process, sometimes one has to work out terrible ideas just to get them out of one's system, to see how truly bad a design idea can work out. I suspect this fellow felt much better once he saw how horribly bloated is the result. Link to post Share on other sites
Roger Walling 668 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 I think some of the designers here are the ones that designed the platypus. Link to post Share on other sites
TAKerry 639 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 13 hours ago, CarlLaFong said: I suppose the last ride should be sporty and stylish! Link to post Share on other sites
TAKerry 639 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 I think the idea of capturing a market share by adding doors to a sports car is well........................ I think you all know what I mean. Link to post Share on other sites
Terry Bond 1,850 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Are you sure somebody didn't photo-shop this by crafting part of an MGBGT on a Jag and then stretching it? Is ground clearance such a problem they had to raise it up to make it look even more ridiculous? I guess being locked up at home is having a mental impact on some designers! Terry 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Morgansdad 276 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Just one word about this design. I DON'T LIKE IT ! Link to post Share on other sites
padgett 2,262 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 At least it is the later "open headlight" model. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
CarlLaFong 501 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 3 hours ago, Terry Bond said: Are you sure somebody didn't photo-shop this by crafting part of an MGBGT on a Jag and then stretching it? Is ground clearance such a problem they had to raise it up to make it look even more ridiculous? I guess being locked up at home is having a mental impact on some designers! Terry Movie car. Google "Harold and Maude" 1 Link to post Share on other sites
padgett 2,262 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 I always liked the Volvo P1800ES. Link to post Share on other sites
Tinindian 1,735 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 19 hours ago, nickelroadster said: It looks very pregnant. I hope it doesn't give birth anytime soon. Must be a relative of the 1929 Buick. Link to post Share on other sites
Paul Dobbin 1,043 Posted January 18 Share Posted January 18 Sports cars are for two occupants max, not soccer Moms and the team. Link to post Share on other sites
Ozstatman 401 Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 13 hours ago, Roger Walling said: I think some of the designers here are the ones that designed the platypus. Hey, leave our platypusses/platypii alone! 🖐️ 😉 1 1 Link to post Share on other sites
8E45E 1,296 Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 22 hours ago, TAKerry said: I think the idea of capturing a market share by adding doors to a sports car is well........................ I think you all know what I mean. It worked for Porsche. Convincing enough for Maserati and Lamborghini to follow suit. Craig Link to post Share on other sites
AURktman 202 Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 51 minutes ago, 8E45E said: It worked for Porsche. Convincing enough for Maserati and Lamborghini to follow suit. Craig With the new lineup of cars where they can make it look right. Make a 4 door Countach and see what happens. Link to post Share on other sites
8E45E 1,296 Posted January 19 Share Posted January 19 2 minutes ago, AURktman said: Make a 4 door Countach and see what happens. Iacocca gave one a shot in 1987: https://www.motor1.com/news/63008/concept-we-forgot-1987-chrysler-lamborghini-portofino/ Craig 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now