Mark Gregory Posted January 13, 2021 Share Posted January 13, 2021 Some automotive historians feel that the term also describes a nonfunctional circular bulge that is stamped into the trunk lid or a cosmetic accessory to the rear of the car giving the impression of a spare tire mount. Made popular by a number of Italian bodied Chrysler concept cars, and later embraced by Chrysler designer Virgil Exner, this idea made its way to production models on the Imperials in 1957 and worked their way down to baseline Valiant compacts by the early 1960s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edinmass Posted January 13, 2021 Share Posted January 13, 2021 What an expensive way to ruin the look of your car. 21 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rocketraider Posted January 13, 2021 Share Posted January 13, 2021 🤮🤮🤮 Connie kits IMHO should be unallowable on any vehicle except a Lincoln Continental or 1st-gen Thunderbird. Chrysler toilet seats are barely acceptable. The ungainly things ruin the styling on everything else they're tacked onto. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PONTIAC1953 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Would love to know why the majority of the cars you posted never had a continental kit originally, whereas my 1953 Pontiac Chieftain Custom Catalina did have the factory option of the continental kit, and my car was ordered and assembled with the option. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
padgett Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Just think if they adopted the 30's look with two spare tires. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PONTIAC1953 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 (edited) 17 minutes ago, padgett said: Just think if they adopted the 30's look with two spare tires. like the customized body work done to the mid-late 1970s Cadillac Seville with the shorten driver/passenger compartment and the lengthen front fenders with the fake sidemount humps ??? Edited January 14, 2021 by pontiac1953 (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
padgett Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 I meant in the back, not sidemounts. Like this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bhigdog Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 When i was young I thought they were really "cool". I also thought smoking, da hair do,s and side burns were too......bob 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
victorialynn2 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 I actually wish my car didn’t have it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Anything more obtrusive than this is too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PONTIAC1953 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 4 hours ago, victorialynn2 said: I actually wish my car didn’t have it. hi, your Ford Skyliner is one of the few late 1950s American Automobiles that looks good with the continental kit, the extending rear fenders and taillights help to keep the kit from sticking out too far from the body of the car, doesn't look like it interferes with opening and closing of the trunk lid when you put the retracting hardtop in the trunk or bring it back out and up. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Kingsley Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 There's a local 55 Chevrolet with one, with a mural of itself painted on it. It's not factory stock so I won't show it, but I like the way it looks. Some cars it fits, others it looks terrible. The Cadillac leading off the thread looks particularly bad to my eyes. I think it works particularly well on the 1958 Impala. It's like the trim around the taillights was designed specifically to accommodate it. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTR Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 14 hours ago, padgett said: Just think if they adopted the 30's look with two spare tires. Early Thirties Alfa-Romeo 6C1750 or 8C2300 Gran Sport and alike ? OTOH, anyone seriously enamored by or into Cont. Kits on post war cars should go to major car gatherings in Sweden. Not only do they have probably more rare/unusual models of most post war (up to ‘70s ?) American cars anywhere in the world, including U.S., but same with Cont. Kits and other aftermarket (vintage) bling one can load on a single car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingrudy Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Talk about guiding the lily. Beautiful cars with great lines made to look out of proportion by the continental kit. It appears that the weight distribution is way off and makes you wonder if the front wheels are touching the ground. Waste of money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dictator27 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Where are the Nashes and Ramblers which came from the factory with continental kits? Almost all of the above are afterthoughts and look the part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bryankazmer Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 15 hours ago, rocketraider said: 🤮🤮🤮 Connie kits IMHO should be unallowable on any vehicle except a Lincoln Continental or 1st-gen Thunderbird. Chrysler toilet seats are barely acceptable. The ungainly things ruin the styling on everything else they're tacked onto. 53 -4 Caribbeans also OK. Basically, allow if factory not aftermarket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTR Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 4 minutes ago, kingrudy said: Talk about guiding the lily. Beautiful cars with great lines made to look out of proportion by the continental kit. It appears that the weight distribution is way off and makes you wonder if the front wheels are touching the ground. Waste of money. Lots of people like (aftermarket) add-on bling doo-dads. No different than adding extra horns/lights/mirrors, side mount spares, running board boxes, travel trunks, etc on prewar cars that didn’t come with them. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
60FlatTop Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 (edited) I like the integrated style as on the first Lincoln Continental. In that instance it was a form follows function thing. The obvious add-on ones tend to get gross. Derham did a couple of Chryslers that came off well. I had a Lincoln coupe section I was tempted to graft on to a '48 Packard I wanted to "Derhamize". There are some '60's cars that could come off smooth if the mounting was recessed. But it's all custom stuff. Edited January 14, 2021 by 60FlatTop (see edit history) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dalef62 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 1954 Nash with factory kit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bryankazmer Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 integrated yes. Not so much on form follows function, as trunk access function is rather compromised. i do love Derham's efforts in the late forties on Lincoln and Packard (convertible sedans). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Bruce aka First Born Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Blonds, Brunets and Redheads! Aren't we glad for choices? The world would be a dull place if everyone liked only the same. Ben 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrbartlett Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Odd how popular continental kits are today, considering that when I was growing up in the 1950s we really did not see them very often. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John348 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 2 minutes ago, jrbartlett said: Odd how popular continental kits are today, considering that when I was growing up in the 1950s we really did not see them very often. Very true, just think of having that thing in your way going in and out of the trunk? or even worse having a flat tire and taking all of that crap off to get the spare out? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
padgett Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 I always liked the typewriter Valiants better than the Lancers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TTR Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 22 minutes ago, jrbartlett said: Odd how popular continental kits are today, considering that when I was growing up in the 1950s we really did not see them very often. How common were WWW tires on daily drivers back then ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
padgett Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 By 1960 WWW tires had given way to stripes. General Dual 90s had three. I always turned WWs in on my cars, just never liked them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
victorialynn2 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 9 hours ago, pontiac1953 said: hi, your Ford Skyliner is one of the few late 1950s American Automobiles that looks good with the continental kit, the extending rear fenders and taillights help to keep the kit from sticking out too far from the body of the car, doesn't look like it interferes with opening and closing of the trunk lid when you put the retracting hardtop in the trunk or bring it back out and up. Thanks. It doesn’t interfere with the top. It’s just so big... I call it the “back porch”. 😆 I like the proportions of the car better without one. The car is already so long in the back to accommodate the roof. I won’t make any major changes to my dad’s car though, so it’s staying. I’m sure he would have taken it off if he didn’t like it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimKB1MCV Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Truthfully. I had forgotten how ugly most of them were (are). That said, some designs carry the kits better than others. I recall them being quite popular but not to everyone's taste, just as wide whites weren't for everybody. In 1960 I got a 'smokin' deal on four WW blems one of the local garages got stuck with and had in stock for a year without any takers. They set off the brick-red '50 Studebaker Champion convertible nicely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Harwood Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 The guy who put a continental kit on a 1959 Cadillac should have his driving privileges permanently revoked. The rest should have something unpleasant but not permanent happen to them. Except maybe the '65 Thunderbird guy. He should not be allowed to own anything but Hyundais or something. 3 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Smolinski Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 15 minutes ago, Matt Harwood said: The guy who put a continental kit on a 1959 Cadillac should have his driving privileges permanently revoked. The rest should have something unpleasant but not permanent happen to them. Except maybe the '65 Thunderbird guy. He should not be allowed to own anything but Hyundais or something. Not only a continental kit on the Coupe De Ville, but also dual rear mount antennas, quad rear exhaust + lake pipes. Ruined an absolutely fabulous car. He ought to be hung by the jewels & beat with a teaspoon until he begs for mercy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Smolinski Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 The '55 Olds and the Crown Victoria look good with the kit, but then these are customized cars. Both are really sharp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SC38dls Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 George you forgot the spotlights near the windshield on the caddy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Smolinski Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 13 minutes ago, SC38DLS said: George you forgot the spotlights near the windshield on the caddy. Right. The punishment should remain the same, though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
58L-Y8 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 The pleasant insanity of innocent excess... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Roth Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 1 hour ago, TTR said: How common were WWW tires on daily drivers back then ? Extremely popular back in the 1950s, at least around my part of New Jersey, and so were the "Continental" kit 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Roth Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 1 hour ago, victorialynn2 said: Thanks. It doesn’t interfere with the top. It’s just so big... I call it the “back porch”. 😆 I like the proportions of the car better without one. The car is already so long in the back to accommodate the roof. I won’t make any major changes to my dad’s car though, so it’s staying. I’m sure he would have taken it off if he didn’t like it. Hi Victorialynn, One benefit is that it does give you somewhere to sit during a "Runningboard" picnic 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JACK M Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Original. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
victorialynn2 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 58 minutes ago, Marty Roth said: Hi Victorialynn, One benefit is that it does give you somewhere to sit during a "Runningboard" picnic Ha! I would not sit on it. I think it would break. 🤣 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AL1630 Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 Maybe I should put one on my Rambler, it would really class it up and make it seem more fancy than the economy car it is! 😄 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Huston Posted January 14, 2021 Share Posted January 14, 2021 2 minutes ago, AL1630 said: Maybe I should put one on my Rambler, it would really class it up and make it seem more fancy than the economy car it is! 😄 Kind of like the current fad of modified exhaust systems on small four cylinder FWD Japanese cars? Trying sound like something other than a small economy car. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now