buick man

FS- Love to Love or Hate to Love - 1957 Buick !!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

.... I mean no bad and not defending anything here really , but gee Smartin I just don't think if you had listed your RM on BaT you would of pulled anything near the upper 20's listing price you were asking and most likely why it was listed on both this site and eBay.   So a comparably presented car evan as a  Special with easily detachable nuances in comparable condition and overall presentation should be lucky to peak at under 10k, really what are we missing and here is why ? 

 

BaT is an interesting site.  IMO and generally speaking it is a community that can be easily divided ... On the one hand you have your veneered cork smelling wine caver's set generally within a specific age grouping range that identifies and appreciates predominately european gated community shiny offerings, Fuchs, Ruf wheels, european factory tool kits etc. and/or offerings of either over the top resto-mod american 4 wheelers or " Survival Bot,  " Transformer Type" all terrain restored and heavily upgraded vehicles. The other group appears is predominately set well within the informed retired rare to purchase range and which btw seems to contribute the bulk of the commentary during each sale.  A site for the Love of true preserved American classic non modded metal ? - Ah not so much.  In short, for these reasons and no doubt others, BaT is a poor site to sell true american preserved classics at their true potential value for American pre to mid 60's rolling iron and that segment of the public that these classic cars endear themselves to is shrinking by gentrification but their value is still out there when presented correctly to the right audience.      

 

Dynaflow as a 2-Speed or 2-Range transmission ? ... That is the question. To shift or not to shift quoted the Raven.  My take is the Dynaflow as a fluid coupling torque multiplying type transmission as Lance and others correctly pointed out not an actual conventional thinking 2 speed transmission but a rather and more correctly a 2 range transmission with each range offering an almost logarithmic multiplication of torque based on a fluid's ability to move an object and not based upon a direct gear's ability to do so achieved by hard gearing and layshaft interplay resulting solid feel of gear changes. 

Edited by buick man (see edit history)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought you could pick out all of the authenticity issues without needing to ask me why I thought the price would top out at $12k.  


I got good money for my car because it’s an excellent example.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AE479837-20C4-4BF1-8B25-8855E9313A6D.png.c6ffe43c0b04cb633ec17ddc11ea738b.png

14 hours ago, buick man said:

....not an actual conventional thinking 2 speed transmission but a rather and more correctly a 2 range transmission with each range offering an almost logarithmic multiplication of torque based on a fluid's ability to move an object and not based upon a direct gear's ability to do so achieved by hard gearing and layshaft interplay resulting solid feel of gear changes. 

 

What are you talking about?

 

My bicycle is a 5-speed. It doesn’t shift automatically, and technically it has sprockets, not gears, but when I tell people it’s a 5-speed, they somehow seem to understand without getting pretentious. 
 

Look:  GEARS!!! 🙄2FDBD2A1-0D17-4C52-B1B2-4642FDA64000.jpeg.e81fd4468681beaca244fde3b94067cf.jpeg

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Edit to my prior post Smartin yes you had a very nice complete original model 57 and got a proper and realistic price for value at the sale but that was not my contention here so perhaps I should give an abbreviated power point explanation to clarify once again ....  In short IMO you never would of gotten even half that amount had you gone through BaT ... and this seller who knows it now should never of done so either.  Classic cars selling on BaT are almost always " mercy sales " ( aka load and dump sales ) via estate executors i.e with no reserve or through non savvy family members with reserve.  Hope that cleans everyone's shorts.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Special Ed : Not to sound too pretentious here and I mean no bad, but I recommend that you go drive a real period correct dynaflow and report back to us on your take about the absolute obvious lack of ANY sensation, sound, vibration of sprockets or gears changing during acceleration or deceleration ... That is Dynaflow ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I’m pretty sure that claiming some special form of knowledge or fabrication of your own definitions of terms to argue against data that came from Buick’s own literature is a classic example pretentiousness. 
 

I’ve been driving a ‘56 Buick for over 25 years. If YOU can’t feel the difference between low GEAR and drive, maybe YOURS is broken. 🤷🏼‍♂️

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Repost from earlier:

Technically it is a 2 speed.  I think the confusion comes from the fact that most people in normal driving will only use the high gear, and the car doesn't shift itself between the 2; both are not required for full range of speed.  Hence, calling it a 2-speed Dynaflow is accurate but calling it a 2-speed automatic is not.

 
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

.... er now I'm getting confused, you mean 2 range Dynaflow right with 2 sprockets ? .... 😇

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/4/2020 at 8:33 PM, buick man said:

Special Ed : Not to sound too pretentious here and I mean no bad, but I recommend that you go drive a real period correct dynaflow and report back to us on your take about the absolute obvious lack of ANY sensation, sound, vibration of sprockets or gears changing during acceleration or deceleration ... That is Dynaflow ....

If you're addressing me, you're smokln' your week old never washed socks.  The first car that I drove when I was 14 was my dad's 1950 Buick - Dynaflow equipped.  When I was old enough to have a car of my own, it was a 1955 Buick - Dynaflow equipped, which I traded for a 1957 Buick - Dynaflow equipped.  Then there was the 1963 Buick Wildcat - Dynaflow equipped.  After I got married and my family was established (1982,) I bought a 1963 Buick Riviera - Dynaflow equipped - and drove it as my daily driver fo 18 years. It now has 197K on the clock. It had 72K on it when I bought it.

 

Dad was a professional mechanic at the Stuart Conklin dealership in Hutchinson, KS.  Our family dinners usually had at least one mention of what dad worked on that day. Lots of talks about the Dynaflow's torque multiplication capabilities. Dad even had to go out of town and "back to school" for a number of days to go to Dynaflow training in the late 40's.  He shared a lot with us about transmissions.

 

I've driven my share of Dynaflows. To me it's a torque multiplying variable pitch transmission, that has, according to the chassis manuals, a separate low gear to be used for getting out of a tough spot or to assist in braking (if you like your teeth in the steering wheel.) Dad told me "NEVER" shift from L to D at full throttle - it's  not designed for that.  In my opinion, a person trying to sell a Dynaflow equipped Buick is not familiar with them and is only getting information by looking at the shift quadrant.  Same guy that will tell you that my 1964 Buick Riviera has a two speed transmission.

 

I remember that when I was in the 6th grade (1958) that we took a field trip from Hutchinson to Lindsborg to visit the Birger Sanzden art museum.  When we got there, Danny Holloway's mother was complaining that her new to her 1955 Buick Roadmaster was "stuck in low gear, it won't shift." (And she was cruising with everyone else at 70 mph.) As a 12 year old kid, I was able to tell her that a Dynaflow equipped Buick has no discernable shifts.

  

Not knowing me our my background, you did come off pretentious and meaning bad.  "Special Ed?" Someting close to you? That is totally politically incorrect. At least you've grown past using the "r" word.

 

I'll wager that I've driven more miles in a Dynaflow equipped car in my 73 years than you have.  Any wagers?

 

Ed - Special only to my family.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, RivNut said:

 

Not knowing me our my background, you did come off pretentious and meaning bad.  "Special Ed?" Someting close to you? That is totally politically incorrect. At least you've grown past using the "r" word.

 

I'll wager that I've driven more miles in a Dynaflow equipped car in my 73 years than you have.  Any wagers?

 

Ed - Special only to my family.

 

RivNut, I am pretty sure Buick Man was aiming his reply toward forum member "Special Education".

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, lancemb said:

 

RivNut, I am pretty sure Buick Man was aiming his reply toward forum member "Special Education".

If that is the case, I didn't catch the other post.  When I open a thread, I'm automatically directed to the last thread read. Buick Man's was the first to show up and I assumed that it was directed at me because I'm the guy who first questioned the use of "two speed" to describe a Dynaflow.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now