30DodgePanel

Musk's Cyber Truck speed bump

Recommended Posts

Quote

 

How did the world survive without "armored glass" electric butt ugly trucks? What did it cost to produce another item we don't need? Bob 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, 1937hd45 said:

How did the world survive without "armored glass" electric butt ugly trucks? What did it cost to produce another item we don't need? Bob 

Why do you need armored glass?  Is he expecting to sell a bunch of them to the Taliban?  I could see a chip/ crack proof Windshield,  that would be nice,  but beyond that not sure the reasoning unless they are afraid all us oil burners will go Mad Max on them? 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I agree totally confused by the whole window thing.  Meanwhile the Rivian electric truck coming out is actually quite attractive and they brought back the Golf club door!!!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, auburnseeker said:

Why do you need armored glass?  Is he expecting to sell a bunch of them to the Taliban?  I could see a chip/ crack proof Windshield,  that would be nice,  but beyond that not sure the reasoning unless they are afraid all us oil burners will go Mad Max on them? 

I think Elon is a man of extremes. And when the thought of chip proof glass comes up, I imagine him saying, “Why not go all out and make it armored, we can tell the consumer they are getting the absolute best available today”.

 

Obviously that’s not true. 

 

On on a side note, it looks like Back to the Future Part II will only be about 5 or 6 years off on the future prediction. The truck fits right with that motif. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, DB26 said:

On on a side note, it looks like Back to the Future Part II will only be about 5 or 6 years off on the future prediction. The truck fits right with that motif. 

Maybe that's the whole hype.  You would make more off the movie sales than the truck.  Might be the only way to sell the truck. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, auburnseeker said:

Why do you need armored glass?  Is he expecting to sell a bunch of them to the Taliban?  I could see a chip/ crack proof Windshield,  that would be nice,  but beyond that not sure the reasoning unless they are afraid all us oil burners will go Mad Max on them? 

Did you notice the headlights on that thing? Maybe after they burn the paint off your trunk lid or tail gate there would be need for "armor glass" . Bob 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gota love the Ford ad's. Built Ford tough with Military grade aluminum.  Next time I need to build something I am going to waltz down to my local metal supplier and get some of that military stuff.  Aluminum Association designation ? or just good old fashioned marketing hype. Seems to me

the military probably uses nearly every grade of aluminum produced in one product or another. Military grade aluminum canteens ?  Or military grade ground to air missile parts ? It's the military so most likely the same thing...not.

 

Greg in Canada

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, 1937hd45 said:

Did you notice the headlights on that thing? Maybe after they burn the paint off your trunk lid or tail gate there would be need for "armor glass" . Bob 

Maybe the armored glass need a forward facing laser for potential combat duty after the Apocalypse. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everything that guy comes out with is a joke. I'm surprised so few people notice.

 

 

couldnt agree more........... yet he is a billionaire and you and I arent. 

 

at least Im not.........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Staver, technically Ford isn't lying about their claim of Military Grade Aluminum. Everything the government purchases for the military must meet what's known as Mil-Spec (Military Specifications) or Mil-Std, (Military Standard). That being said, the aluminum that the government  buys, is the exact same stuff we can buy at our metal supply and meets their specifications. It's simply a play on words to impress the gullible, general public and sell cars. For that matter, Chevy can claim that the steel they use is "Military Grade" steel. 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Got news for them, it would be hard to define that thing as a "truck."  They'd do better trying to brand it as something totally different.  Shades of the Pontiac Aztec-and we all know what became of Pontiac shortly after that ugly thing hit the marketplace!

Terry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Terry Bond said:

Got news for them, it would be hard to define that thing as a "truck."  They'd do better trying to brand it as something totally different.  Shades of the Pontiac Aztec-and we all know what became of Pontiac shortly after that ugly thing hit the marketplace!

Terry

 

True but at least the Aztec had a successful comeback in the Breaking Bad series... 

 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sure Karl Benz, Gottlieb Daimler, Ransom Eli Olds, Henry Ford and most other early automotive pioneers were laughed at and bore the brunt of jokes from many sceptics (and horse owners/dealers) who would not/could not foresee the future role of automotive transportation in changing the world around them. As this site/forum in many ways pays homage to these now revered pioneers, I find it peculiar that some AACA members (especially in this thread and some similarly focused ones), gleefully celebrate hiccups by modern day "pioneers", or so openly dump on their attempts to advance transportation technology. I'm not at all opposed to fair comment, even hostile resistance to change, but ask all readers to consider one fact: If entrepreneurs/"pioneers" in North America do not succeed in this endeavor, some one else will. Will that make you happier? I think not.

 

BTW, they say any publicity is good publicity. Had it not been for the broken glass hiccup, most Americans would likely not have even heard of the Tesla Cyber Truck. So perhaps a hiccup can be good news. I often find a spoonful of sugar helps. 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, mercer09 said:

Everything that guy comes out with is a joke. I'm surprised so few people notice.

 

 

couldnt agree more........... yet he is a billionaire and you and I arent. 

 

at least Im not.........

I have seen interviews where he explained the jokes. A while back he offered souvenir flame throwers. This was a gag he got from the movie Spaceballs. In the movie there was a gift shop, the best selling item was a flame thrower "the kids love it!". Musk thought this was funny so he made a Tesla flame thrower - actually a torch used for sealing rubber membrane roofs, relabeled "Not A Flame Thrower". Then there is the Boring Company. The joke here is obvious. He claims he has a giant boring machine digging a tunnel miles long under Los Angeles (or was it Las Vegas?}. Do you have any idea what it would take to get permission from every property owner to tunnel under their property, and the liability for damaged foundations, wells, water pipes, sewer pipes, electrical cables etc etc etc? I'm not sure which is more absurd, the idea of a subway to nowhere in Las Vegas which doesn't need it, or one in a notorious earthquake zone like Los Angeles.

You could go on and on. The only business he has that is not a complete joke is Tesla cars, and he didn't start that, and it is only in business thanks to billions in government subsidies.

I like to think of the new truck with broken windows as another of his jokes. If he is really serious about it then he has  lost his mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The unplanned glass breakage setup the best series of events for name recognition and product display.  If everything went as planned no one outside of those following EV products would have seen it.  When you figure how much free TV and print exposure were generated it’s one of the best wrong things that could have happened for Tesla.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

not sure I agree Terry.

 

everytime one catches on fire, is that a good thing? free publicity and all?

 

lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bad publicity is usually not good for products unless they tell you you can't or shouldn't buy it,  then it usually helps.  To tell someone you have the best and it comes up short in a test right before your eyes then, definitely not helpful. 

Think of a commercial with a new Dodge Muscle car showing you how bad it is, then getting dusted by a young kid in a live broadcast driving some 20 year old tuner. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, mercer09 said:

not sure I agree Terry.

 

everytime one catches on fire, is that a good thing? free publicity and all?

 

lol

Bunch of old guys who never say they would own one are taking about it now on a forum about old cars.   News like that is short lived anyway and does indeed make your name visible in the public eye.  If you never heard of Tesla before this, you have now.  If you follow the news you will also learn the same truck was used to take journalists for a ride that night after the glass was quickly replaced.  Many  thought it rode well and and was roomy inside despite the obvious unique cab design.  Not a totally bad PR event overall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And by the way, how many non electric cars catch fire every day for no apparent reason?  No one has given up driving cars over fear of it happening.  More new Samsung smart phones burned up in the premier of the Galaxy note whatever it was and yet the replacement sells well.  We’ll have to see how the rest of the plan plays out.  If nothing else every futuristic science fiction movie will have one or more in it just like when Toyota brought out that futuristic minivan many years ago.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is easily the ugliest abomination since the '56 Sir Vival or the '58 Aurora.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now