Jump to content

Buick paper ads


Elpad

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

This ad from 1937 appeared in the souvenir program for the annual Fireman's Day for the Inc. Village of Floral Park, Long Island , NY  which is located just west of Belmont Park horse race track . I have been the official appointed Historian for the village for two decades ( NY state requires a appointed historian for incorporated villages it is a state law) . My family has resided in Floral Park for 96 years. I drive around town in my 1940 Buick Roadmaster conv. sedan and the Mayor and Trustees still put up with me - amazing.

1937BUICKadvertFlPk001.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Barney Eaton said:

I found this in the 1988 Buick Marketing Manual..... appears to be intended as an ad.

Interesting and rare option ...the Regal offered the 4 - seater option for a short time

4 B1B.jpg

Following the Rivera's four seat personal luxury car.  Has anyone seen one in person. Or did this never make it into production?   Riviera took their clues from Ford's 1958 'Square Bird' Thunderbird.  Corvette and Thunderbird were two seat personal luxury cars, what four seat cars were the first?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have seen 2 maybe 3 at various Buick events.... the Buick information indicates it could be ordered on either 2 or 4 door Regals but I have never seen a 4 door.

If the vehicle is original,  there is a decal on the rear side windows the says "four seater"   The limited reference material I have shows the option available from 1988 to 1993.

4 codeB1B.jpg

Edited by Barney Eaton (see edit history)
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/5/2020 at 8:38 PM, RivNut said:

Following the Rivera's four seat personal luxury car.  Has anyone seen one in person.

 

There was one in my area several years ago.  I was surprised when I saw it.  It was a 2 dr and looked pretty sporty!  Unfortunately the 88 was equipped with the 2.8 engine which I had previously  found to be weak in the main bearings, so I kept on moving past it.   Would have been great with a 3800 ...  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
16 hours ago, MrEarl said:

1BC34EB2-837C-4C16-9E8D-E245943DA9DB.thumb.jpeg.282e67602de09dcbfa495531a1e7720e.jpeg

 

Note the artist, Ken Ebert,  doesn't mention in the text the "first "Riviera" in the far background, a '49 Roadmaster Riviera, the year the Riviera name was first used. I have seen this Ken Ebert print as a poster also and would not mind having one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RivNut said:

I wonder why no Pontiac was shown?  Do you think that GM is showing you which "class" of people each brand appeals to by the characters pictured with each brand?

 

 

GM was certainly all about setting up a class hierarchy in those days, which is why it's unusual to see an ad which implied that Cad, Buick and Olds were all similar.  But when you think about it, there was a pretty clear line separating these top three brands from the bottom two, Pontiac and Chevy, so it makes sense to me that Pontiac was not included.

 

As far as the "class" of people shown, again it seems unusual to me that GM would momentarily drop the idea that there was a definite difference moving up the chain between Olds, Buick, and Cadillac.  But the people in this ad all look to be from the same general group of prosperous-looking upper middle class folks.  It's interesting that there are no children, no "family" scenes -- it's all about the adults doing stuff without their kids.  I think this would be in contrast to Pontiac and Chevy ads which would more likely show the whole family.

 

And one of the most surprising things -- no white walls!  It makes the cars look a bit odd compared to the restored versions we're all used to seeing.  Were white wall tires unavailable because of the Korean War?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, neil morse said:

 

 

GM was certainly all about setting up a class hierarchy in those days, which is why it's unusual to see an ad which implied that Cad, Buick and Olds were all similar.  But when you think about it, there was a pretty clear line separating these top three brands from the bottom two, Pontiac and Chevy, so it makes sense to me that Pontiac was not included.

 

As far as the "class" of people shown, again it seems unusual to me that GM would momentarily drop the idea that there was a definite difference moving up the chain between Olds, Buick, and Cadillac.  But the people in this ad all look to be from the same general group of prosperous-looking upper middle class folks.  It's interesting that there are no children, no "family" scenes -- it's all about the adults doing stuff without their kids.  I think this would be in contrast to Pontiac and Chevy ads which would more likely show the whole family.

 

And one of the most surprising things -- no white walls!  It makes the cars look a bit odd compared to the restored versions we're all used to seeing.  Were white wall tires unavailable because of the Korean War?

White wall matters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...