Jump to content

American Rolls Royce (Ghost, PI & PII)


Recommended Posts

As to the first picture... the only significant difference between the ghost and the PI was the engine. Much of the chassis is virtually interchangeable. Probably most roadsters are later rebodies and were updated at the time. It is practically impossible to tell from a small photo which it is if it has the later body features. That car, with it's drum headlights could be either a late ghost or an early PI. The fact is, RR simply didn't appeal to to the sporting crowd anywhere near as much as it did to the very conservative limousine class. Roadsters were the sort of car they advertised but I think they mostly sold sedans and limos. Today, I'll bet half the surviving cars are "open." It would be interesting to go through the records and find out what percentage were open cars when delivered. I'll bet the numbers don't match and probably aren't even close. But... is a rebody done by RR of America a "modified car"? It certainly wouldn't be in my book.

Edited by JV Puleo (see edit history)
Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the factory color, chrome yellow, a Packard factory color. The original interior was raspberry. It's a Disappearing Top car. Neat hardware on the car. Purchased new for a young lady's college graduation if my memory serves me. Photo taken last week with my trusty assistant.

IMG_4885.JPG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ronny is putting on weight.  That is a fantastic car but if I was restoring it I would be in a quandary over sticking with the original color.

 

Anybody notice Norma Talmage's P1 on ebay?  115k or Best offer.

 

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1930-Rolls-Royce-Phantom-/192254782881

 

The original owner of this 1930 Springfield Rolls Royce Phantom I Trouville was the famous film producer Joe Schenck, President of United Artists and later chairman of 20th Century Fox.  During the Golden Age of Hollywood he was one of the most powerful and influential people in the film business.  His personal Rolls Royce (now offered for sale) has attended many Hollywood Premiere events, and transported countless celebrities and stars of the silver screen.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Rolls on ebay is owned by a very will known west coast craftsman, who I had the pleasure of meeting last month at the Pierce meet. It is a very nice automobile.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Working on the PII last week, needed a few small items, and we had to make them. Brake light switch and a Bakelite part for the chassis was broken. I am going to make two extras of each in case someone else needs them in the future. 

IMG_4881.JPG

IMG_4882.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Invented in 1907 and made in both the US and the UK. The original patents ran out in 1927, at which point anyone could manufacture it. It actually seems quite similar to the "hard rubber" that daguerreotype cases were made of although I think it is much stronger. I think it was Westinghouse that had the idea of combining it, under extreme pressure, with linen or paper to produce a machinable phenolic resin material.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A little late to the conversation....

 

Here is my car. 1927 Springfield Phantom I Tilbury Sedan, S274RM. This car was bought new by a member of the Vanderbilt family in NYC and sold to Al Fisk (Fisk Iron Works in Cincinnati and early RROC member) and later to David Noran. I have driven the car about 13,000 miles since 2003. When I bought it, it had about 87K original miles and the next trip out will probably make the speedometer go back to 00000. These cars take a lot of sorting out-more than most 1927 American cars-but after they are well sorted out, they are great drivers. 55 mph is no problem and the engine does not overwind at this speed. This car is mostly original with the exception of a 1960s repaint by Fisk. Although I have done a lot of mechanical work to it, it has not been apart. It has been driven hard and often during my ownership. I just love these cars. Understated elegance when they are properly presented..

thumbnail_WP_004370.jpg

Edited by motoringicons (see edit history)
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

All the Springfield cars are terrific machines. Many people look past the Springfield Ghost. BIG mistake. I think a Springfield Ghost may be the best dollar value you can get in the old car hobby today. I see open Ghosts selling for very reasonable money the last few years. I predict in the near future the next generation of collectors will figure these cars out, and they will be much harder to acquire. The more I drive our P1, the better I like it, I I was a huge fan for the past 35 years. With lots of sorting and tweaking they are a pure joy to drive when right. Most of them I have driven are not sorted, and thus stiff and unresponsive. Ed

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to agree with Ed in this. Personally, the nicest Springfield RR cars I've driven were unrestored Ghosts in excellent condition, notably the William Brewster car above and S111BG, the Permanent Salamanca that was used in the Robert Redford Great Gatsby movie. S11BG didn't have front brakes and was noticeably lighter handling than any  PI. Were I to have my choice, I'd want a RHD Springfield Ghost with a closed body, though the likelihood of my ever being able to afford such a car is close to nil.

Edited by JV Puleo (see edit history)
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
On 8/1/2017 at 8:56 PM, alsancle said:

Walt or Joe,  can you explain the differences in the heads?  I assume the later heads were an improvement?  Were there cracking issues with the aluminum?

 

Ed,  bring your Duesenberg stuff over to the Duesenberg thread and don't pollute the good thing we have going here!

The issue with the Aluminum heads seems to not as much cracking of the heads as porosity of the aluminum.  My understanding was they treated the heads with build linseed oil (or some other sealer) and when that came into contact with alcohol based anti-freezes (and time) it ate the coating.  If you pick up an issue of RROC - issue 52-4 August 1952, the problem had become quite apparent by that point. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/8/2017 at 5:13 PM, motoringicons said:

A little late to the conversation....

 

Here is my car. 1927 Springfield Phantom I Tilbury Sedan, S274RM. This car was bought new by a member of the Vanderbilt family in NYC and sold to Al Fisk (Fisk Iron Works in Cincinnati and early RROC member) and later to David Noran. I have driven the car about 13,000 miles since 2003. When I bought it, it had about 87K original miles and the next trip out will probably make the speedometer go back to 00000. These cars take a lot of sorting out-more than most 1927 American cars-but after they are well sorted out, they are great drivers. 55 mph is no problem and the engine does not overwind at this speed. This car is mostly original with the exception of a 1960s repaint by Fisk. Although I have done a lot of mechanical work to it, it has not been apart. It has been driven hard and often during my ownership. I just love these cars. Understated elegance when they are properly presented..

thumbnail_WP_004370.jpg

 

I have Al Fisk's RROC publications, some of his tools, and ...., plus a variety of things from Ned Hermann and ..... (carted them around for years for the following reason).

 

This came in late June:  A 1932 Springfield PI "Dover Sedan" L Series Car.  Everyone who has seen it in the garage says it is the one of the best looking sedans they have seen from the early 30's.   It has been a pleasure to work on as it has lived its whole life in Garage Mahals.  It was restored by my Mom's cousin (quasi Uncle) in 1971, or so (high quality and holding up well) and received considerable upgrading and engine work, including new Frank Cook Cylinder Head and ... in 1998.

 

Sorry for the bad photo - It had not been run in a while, so it went directly from Flatbead to the back corner of the garage next to the workbench - not a car you take a chance with just starting it up (it has taken 100's hours of prep work).   Have only driven inside the garage - I am still waiting on my gasoline tank to get finished.  I will update.

 

As to its engineering:  In a different way, perhaps the only thing more sophisticated/complicated from the early 1930's is a Duesenberg.  And, you have to resort to:  This is going to take a long time and quite possibly every tool in the toolbox. 

 

By the way:  I could use two more 700 x 20 Denman Whitewalls for the sidemounts.  Contact me:  johnmereness@aol.com   There are 4 that never saw ground until June when I took car off jackstands and the wheels are high point painted with chrome lock rings - and I would prefer to fit two into sidemounts verses changing all 6 (hate repainting 6 wheels).  All being said, I am getting close to a new set of six BF Goodrich - my tire wanted ads have drawn countless scammers out of the woodwork - including one who got to go to jail for it (their email was being monitored and ....).  

 

 

 

 

19224851_10155574056032189_2628719391709281282_n.jpg

Edited by John_Mereness (see edit history)
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/5/2017 at 0:10 PM, edinmass said:

Working on the PII last week, needed a few small items, and we had to make them. Brake light switch and a Bakelite part for the chassis was broken. I am going to make two extras of each in case someone else needs them in the future. 

IMG_4881.JPG

IMG_4882.JPG

I have been repairing with 3M panel Adhesive (the material they use to glue sheet metal together in autobody repair) - it is not quite quite black, but it incredibly strong (comes in a 4- 24 hour dry and a 90 seconds and have used both).

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were the mid 1920's,  and I wanted the best driving (and possibly the fastest super-luxury) car,  no question...I'd want a Springfield P 1. 

 

Think about it - in that era, the typical Packard, Lincoln, Cadillac, etc...were all around 380 cubic inches,  "flat-heads".  The Phantom I was nearly 100 cubic inches larger, combined with a much freer breathing "cross-flow" cyl. head, in a car about the same weight for any given body style.

 

True, some Rolls of that era suffered the same crippling low rear axle ratios of other cars.  Understandable, considering the roads of that era.   But some Rolls had hi speed ( meaning lower numerically) rear axle ratios.    These could be cruised at much higher road speeds thanks to their slower-turning motors.

 

Yes, I am partial to a "Springfield".    With an American transmission, wheels, etc,  superb drivers compared to the awkward English ones.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if those are the fantastically rare, optional stainless steel wire wheels? Years ago my friend EA Mowbray would go out early Sunday morning to get the NY Times and read the "cars for sale" ads. One morning he saw an ad for an unrestored PI "sedan" so we made a mad dash  to southern Connecticut, hoping to get there before anyone else reacted to the ad. It was a PI Avon (one of the best looking sedans) in fairly rough  condition although nowhere near as rough as it looked. There were no spare wheels, but on the ground it had the Buffalo stainless steel wheels. Mr. M bought the car and about a week later got a phone call from another RR collector who offered him a restored set of 6 Buffalo wheels and slightly more money than he had paid for the whole car!

Edited by JV Puleo (see edit history)
Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a conversation with the owner at Carmel on the Pebble Beach road tour. He confirmed they were stainless. It's a very nice car. On the way out of the show we followed him out the back way to avoid the hours long traffic jam, and the car went along very well. It's one of my favorite PI body styles.  This car has the exposed hinges, several of the first ones did not. There are also several Reproduction bodies built in the 1980's that were well done. Ed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Joe,  these days anybody can get Buffalo wires restored with stainless spokes and chrome rims.   I would imagine there are more than a few cars out there with this treatment.   How many originally had them is a different question.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've no idea how many were sold originally, but the number must have been very small. I'd think they might have been seen as too flashy for the average RR customer and I expect they were frightfully expensive, even then - so much so that I doubt they were ever added to the rebodied cars. Of course, the originals had stainless rims and hubs while "faking them" would call for plating the rims and hubs. I do not know if plated wheels were offered, but I think not. I was reacting to the color, which is softer than chrome and much closer to nickel in its appearance though not the same as that either. Of course. making that guess from a photo is a risk but that's why I asked if they could be...

 

I have seen chrome plated wheels on PIs... they look out of place to me, especially when combined with the infamous WW tires. Also, RR didn't introuduce chrome plating until 1929. My PI was one of the first. They had chrome plated the radiator and it did not stick well. Had I kept the car, I'd have polished it all off (easy enough as most of it was falling off in any case).

Link to post
Share on other sites

They were, at least until their secret process stainless called "Stay Bright" came into use. I think that was on the PII. No American-built RRs had Stay Bright radiator shells. My radiator was plated over the german silver which I suspect is why it adhered poorly. I'd have been suspicious of it were it not that I knew the car had been purchased by a Princeton undergraduate around 1948 (for something like $100). He took it apart around 1955 in the family barn and it was delivered directly from that barn to me, the engine apart and complete with a dead rat in the sump.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JV Puleo said:

They were, at least until their secret process stainless called "Stay Bright" came into use. I think that was on the PII. No American-built RRs had Stay Bright radiator shells. My radiator was plated over the german silver which I suspect is why it adhered poorly. I'd have been suspicious of it were it not that I knew the car had been purchased by a Princeton undergraduate around 1948 (for something like $100). He took it apart around 1955 in the family barn and it was delivered directly from that barn to me, the engine apart and complete with a dead rat in the sump.

A later PI Springfield has a chromium plated grill shell - that is also removable cover over the radiator verses being the actual tank for the radiator and I assume German Silver is the base metal.  These radiators are quote "taller" than the earlier radiators via dropping down into the splash pan area.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasn't aware of that. I am certain that, at least on my car, it was the actual tank that was plated, but it was one of the very first cars with a plated radiator. Somewhere I've seen a mention of the chassis number the plating started with but it has been so long since I was involved with RRs that I've quite forgotten where. I still have all my books and manuals but would have to dig them out and go through them. It may be in the "PI Service Sheets" published by the RROC back in the 1970s.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know it's not American but my English 1931 PII Continental was built with "All Fittings to be Stay Bright" according to the build sheet.   This included the radiator and the wheels however the service sheets revel that it was returned to the factory after about 12 months and the wheels were replaced with standard Dunlop wire wheels.  The research that I have done on this seems to show that they had problems with the wheels cracking and most, if not all were recalled. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This really did come out of a barn... in New Jersey just about 45 years ago. I guess I looked pretty happy with my new acquisition. This was taken the morning we towed it home... down Rt. 95 through the center of Providence, RI. We (my friends and I) didn't own a trailer and didn't know anyone who did. I was 20 years old at the time.

 

S193FR-2.thumb.jpg.99053d145add66619cddb45d53c55e92.jpg

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing like a tow rope at 50 mph.  Think about the things that would happen 40 years ago without a second thought that would get you arrested these days.  

 

Joe, do you know where that car is now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've no idea. I looked it up in a RROC membership list once but now I forget where it was. That was still a long time ago. I worry that it may have been rebodied by one of the "only open cars are worth having" crowd. The rear section was Brewster faux cane work. It must have been very striking when new.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a little RR PI Springfield fun:  When I told a RR "authority" that my car was running on original DeJon coils the response was "Hell must have just frozen over, there are perhaps 3 known examples of original coils on the globe - well now I guess there are 5."  Unfortunately, they are also somewhat suspect so they are hitting the shelf for new coils.

 

By the way, the original coils have a dark red/maroon top on them - the Bakelite was painted black in an earlier restoration. 

 

I also took a picture of an original unrestored DeJon distributor data plate - the reproduction as silver  with black paint and this one is clearly silver with white paint. 

 

I have also been told the RR PI cars originally had ignition wire much like "Packard 440 wire" - I would agree from "quote original cars" I have seen, but the tool box was packed with a ratty original set of wire with all the original ends still on them - braided black lacquer wire .

21056238_10155825994952189_5153558429259018517_o.jpg

21078742_10155825998367189_5621014509290527364_n.jpg

21032477_10155825999822189_7609707473864317529_n.jpg

21083452_10155830082087189_1287378594101127687_o.jpg

Edited by John_Mereness (see edit history)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...