Guest Posted September 26, 2000 Share Posted September 26, 2000 <a href="http://www.aaca.org/misc/1939fordpanel1.jpg">Photo #1</a><P><a href="http://www.aaca.org/misc/1939fordpanel2.jpg">Photo #2</a><P><a href="http://www.aaca.org/misc/1939fordpanel3.jpg">Photo #3</a><P>What purpose did this vehicle serve? I know it spent time with the California National Guard, but in what capacity? I firmly believe that the CONVERSION WAS DONE BEFORE VEHICLE WAS DELIVERED. Quality is excellent. <P>MVPA Military Vehicle Preservation Association members (mil-veh on line) have seen identical vehicles (Army Surplus) in Walnut Ridge, ARK. dismantling WWII bombers circa 1948 and in New Mexico as plumbing trucks. <P>TRUCK model IS 99T. Not 91T. It came with big optional 95hp V-8, dual windshield wipers, dual rear 20" wheels and wider running boards and rear fenders. <P>This thing was hardly driven, even in its next life as an appliance repair truck, only about 7,000 miles on the clock. Checking play in suspension, etc., confirms low mileage. <P>Three coats of paint from new. First two OD green, but different shades. I've been told that pre-WWII OD green is different from WWII OD green. <P><BR>Brass tag in pass. side door jam "TB 766". Does this refer to Budd Corporation, "Tech. Bulletin 766" or none of the above? Union Hardware & Metal, Los Angeles, Cal. did the extensive (and expensive) conversion. <P>Cargo area is 80% taken up with these built-in cabinets. Full size bulkhead behind driver's seat. 60% bulkhead approx. 30" inside rear doors. Built-in metal boxes not visible suitable for long items like pipe on left floor 1'x6"x5'? <P>One year+ very hard research. Stumped THIS OLD TRUCK, ATHS on-line, MVPA on-line, Early Ford V-8 on-line, Prof. Donald Wood, and MANY, MANY individuals! Panel of course had doors and drawers covering open spaces on panel sides. <P>More info on request! THANKS IN ADVANCE!!! <P>Don Kenyon <BR>Da-Kenyons@webtv.net <P><p>[This message has been edited by peterg (edited 09-26-2000).] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 27, 2000 Share Posted September 27, 2000 Don, Ron, and, Peter:<P>As I posted previously, to talk with personnel from the era would be the route.<P>My best guess, based on the weight it was designed to hold, is a service vehicle for something heavy...tanks, APC's of the era, field artillery. With no defensive mechanisms visible, it had to be a support vehicle of some sort. Another thought, possibly for the Army Air Corps servicing on tarmacs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 27, 2000 Share Posted September 27, 2000 Heizmann,<P>Not sure what post you refer to when you say "As I posted previously, to talk with personnel from the era would be the route." Regardless, is anyone here from the "era" with some insight on this unique vehicle?<P>Thanks for your note however, I'll pass it on to Don ASAP.<P>Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest c.johnson Posted September 27, 2000 Share Posted September 27, 2000 Hi<P>I'm not from the era, but I have been in the National Guard for over 15 years. ("Military Intellegence" is still an oxymoron.)<BR> <BR>I agree with the assumption that it was an airfield service truck. I think that even for the era, it would have been built too light for the field. The building up that it does have does not seem for dirt use.<BR>This would also explain the low miles, interesting paint job, and so on.<P>My best advise is to contact the California National Guard, and try to find more information through them. There is always a museum (sp?) or a historian in the National Guard somewhere. If you have any idea of the Unit that it belonged to, that would give important information on where to start.<P>Let me know if you need a phone number, I'm sure I can dig one up for the Adjutant General's office.<P>cj<BR> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 27, 2000 Share Posted September 27, 2000 Peter G.<P>Sorry for not being more detailed.<P>I was responding to Don Kenyon's 9/24/00 post that started the query. Topic: HELP ME ID USE OF MILITARY VEHICLE.<P>Peter J. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest c.johnson Posted September 28, 2000 Share Posted September 28, 2000 Okay I think I've got it!!!<P>After a good night sleep, It came to me that while I was a Supply Sergeant I had inventoried a few contact trucks. Contact trucks are rolling shops, full of tools, usually a compressor, generator, tow bar (heavy & big), etc. Contact trucks go find the broken vehicle and repair it, or if they can, tow it back to the maintenence shop.<BR>They are usually beefed up for a few reasons: they have to haul a lot of tools, they can be expected to tow other vehicles, and they belong to the mechanics - who only want the very best. <P>They would be especially useful around Mechanized Infantry - 2 divisions are indigenious to California National Guard.<P>cj Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 28, 2000 Share Posted September 28, 2000 Mr. Johnson, what you say makes so much<BR>sense! One or two MVPA members suggested<BR>"contact truck" but wouldn't elaborate<BR>on what that was. I'm an IHC truck nut<BR>and 20's "Red Babies" were often used as<BR>contact trucks for the dealerships. I<BR>never knew what that meant!<BR>The identical truck seen in Walnut Ridge,<BR>ARK. circa 1947 was FULL of tools. This<BR>according to a very nice man who grew up<BR>there and saw many WWII bombers smelted<BR>after the men with this truck removed engines.<BR>Smell, grime, general feel is definitely<BR>repair or maint.<BR>My current favorite for "ownership" is<BR>the 185th Inf. Reg. based in Los Angeles,<BR>CA or thereabouts. I'm about four hours<BR>to the North near Fresno.<BR>I believe "Nunquam Non Papatus" is the motto I see and I think the chevron and<BR>fleur-de-lis is in the upper left corner.<BR>I KNOW that the upside-down semi-circle<BR>for the 40th Inf. Div. is present and I<BR>can see "Ball of Fire" the Korean era<BR>motto for the 40th. The 185th is a part of the 40th. THANK YOU!! Don Kenyon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now