capngrog Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 A friend emailed me a photo presentation entitled: "Cars That Never Made It". While some of the concept cars shown were downright beautiful, some were "so-so", a few were ugly, but this one, the 1958 Ford X-2000 was just plain "butt-ugly"! What were they thinking? It looks like a combination of cheap drugs, cheap booze and too many "The Jetsons" re-runs. Uh, oh, "The Jetsons" didn't debut on TV until 1962 ... never mind. You know what I mean. I know that "beauty is in the eye of the beholder", but this THING?! That front end looks like a .... well, I'd better not say, but you can fill in the blanks. I ain't drivin' this one,Grog 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CarlLaFong Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 The Simpsons cartoonists must have seen this when they designed "The Homer" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whtbaron Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 When I was in Grade 6 me and a couple friends were tasked with drawing what we thought the car of the future would look like for a school newspaper. lol... it was almost that ugly and actually somewhat similar in design. That would have been about 1970. I can see the advantages of having a grille you could potentially have sex with though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Skyking Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Imagine trying to do bodywork on that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Restorer32 Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Looks like an Edsel that mated with a Dyson vacuum cleaner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capngrog Posted July 13, 2015 Author Share Posted July 13, 2015 I can see the advantages of having a grille you could potentially have sex with though! LMAO! Delicately put, sir. Those were my thoughts, but I couldn't come up with a phrase that would do the design justice. Cheers,Grog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bhigdog Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 LMAO! Delicately put, sir. Those were my thoughts, but I couldn't come up with a phrase that would do the design justice. Cheers,GrogTwat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeff_a Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 (edited) The X-2000 is, uhhh, quite the find, Grog. Not sure I'd wanna drive it, either, especially if someone lit up those JATO bottles on the rear fuselage! If it weren't from 1958, I would say it was the bad styling exercise of the year. It does cover a few bases:sell it as a Barbie & Ken car --- and a few kids would buy itsell it as a scary model kit with a halloween theme ("It Came From 1958!") --- dittoit's only a little uglier than the Batmobile --- so someone might buy it at Scottsdaleif I worked at an automobile design studio, I'd want to have a picture of that on the wall and if someone didn't like my latest drawing I'd point to the X-2000 and say : "Well, it's better than this thing Larry designed and Ford sank a 1/4 million on!"I don't think it has enough hood scoops. Edited July 13, 2015 by jeff_a (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whtbaron Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 (edited) In their defence, cars did become more streamlined in time, so they were on the right track ( more or less, arguably moreso less). The interesting design influence is that windshield. Take a hard look at it and you will see that it has more in common with 90's and newer vehicles than it does with anything that was on the road in the late 50's/ early 60's. lol.... sorry, that was the only good thing I could think to say about it.Maybe there was another car airbrushed out of the picture, but how does the license plate end up being reflected in the back window? Edited July 14, 2015 by whtbaron (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozstatman Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 See this!!!!! -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkMdrJx6sQk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghostymosty Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 Looking closely, I think I see the plate on the rear package shelf causing the reflection in the back glass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Mellor NJ Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 I don't see head lights. You can see it but it can't see you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ozstatman Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 Interesting that in the video, and of course you can believe everything on youtube, there's a statement at about 2'19" that it was only ever a 1/4 scale clay model! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nick8086 Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 (edited) https://www.google.com/search?q=ugly+concept+cars&biw=1259&bih=824&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAWoVChMI1Zaa6eXZxgIVjFOSCh0tGwjS#imgrc=TxLCRu0HAgtjWM%3A Did i see a ford pinto in the pictures... or http://blog.autoshopper.com/articles/3665/Finally-An-Auto-Auction-Lot-That-Comes-With-A-Lifetime-Mating-Prevention-Guarantee/ Edited July 14, 2015 by nick8086 (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
36 D2 Coupe Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 Side scoops taken straight off the front fenders of the Hudson Italia - not too original Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
8E45E Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 (edited) #1, That car at the top is NOT ancient! It is a modern-day iteration of a late '50's/early 60's 'space car'. Look at the windshield for one. #2, The ugliest 'concept cars' were all those safety-inspired ESV's, from the early 1970's with those big black bumpers, heavy black rub-rails on the sides, and periscope on the roof. Perhaps the ugliest was British Leyland's with its built-in 'pedestrian-saver' lift-bar on the hood. Unfortunately, lots of those ugly styling 'features' seen on those ESV's in the name of safety rubbed off onto production cars not long after. Craig Edited July 16, 2015 by 8E45E (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John_S_in_Penna Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 (edited) Craig, you're observant! I was thinking the same thing.And the video indicates that this car is indeeda modern re-creation. The re-creation takes an odd designand makes it fatter and malproportioned, taking awaywhat little grace the original concept had! The windshield appears to be from an early 1970's car.The sharp creases in the front bumper planes, where theywould normally be more rounded, make the re-creation lookamateurish. They were probably done that way bya home craftsman because they were easier to fabricate.And the video shows the re-creation to have a rear endlifted from a 1962 Mercury and totally different from the original concept. Does anyone have more knowledge about the TRUE concept car? Edited July 14, 2015 by John_S_in_Penna (see edit history) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
60FlatTop Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 When I was a kid in school I got into the hobby in 1959. I always had an image in my mind of the "future car". I was really surprised when I actually saw it. Bernie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danleblanc Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 When I was in Grade 6 me and a couple friends were tasked with drawing what we thought the car of the future would look like for a school newspaper. lol... it was almost that ugly and actually somewhat similar in design. That would have been about 1970. I can see the advantages of having a grille you could potentially have sex with though!Yes, because if you drove that car, nobody else would. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
60FlatTop Posted July 14, 2015 Share Posted July 14, 2015 That sex thing was part of the conversation on the Edsel: "Look at those Cadillac bumper guards, we can run with this idea." "Nah, the Caddy got by but I think this is pushing it." Come on, we can play stupid if the media says anything." "If we get this one past it's wide open." "I'm not so sure. I would be as risky as telling them the Falcon on the drawing board can be a sports car." "Well if your think it will sell to some guy who can't understand normal thinkin'".Bernie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScarredKnightfan Posted July 15, 2015 Share Posted July 15, 2015 LOL!!!! I've seen this concept a few times before ... & each time, seems I either observe something different ... or get more chuckles out of the conversations that flow from it. The "sex" line takes the cake ... followed closely by the Dyson-Edsel mating ritual, since it sorta relates. Cort www.oldcarsstronghearts.com1979 & 1989 Caprice Classics | pigValve, paceMaker, cowValve"Where's the mini skirt made of snake skin?" __ Bowling For Soup __ '1985' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whtbaron Posted July 15, 2015 Share Posted July 15, 2015 If you watch that film clip closely there looks to have been at least one version that didn't have that Edsel like grille, and looked much better. The original windshield was more of a half bubble too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleach Posted July 15, 2015 Share Posted July 15, 2015 I found that the car in the photo is a recreation of the original model. It was made from a 62 Mercury Monterey in the 90's.What a waste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now