Sign in to follow this  
prs519

Your opinion on the best (hardiest) makes and years?

Recommended Posts

I was musing about the rise and fall of the Chevrolet Vega. I recall no car ever disappearing so quickly and completely from the public view! Then I got to thinking about certain makes and models which seem to have survived in numbers seemingly inconsistent with the numbers produced. I cannot help but believe that such survival speaks to especially good overall quality. Please list cars you think have outdone themselves per the quantity still existing. Seems to me 37/38 Buick, late 20s Chrysler, and early 30s Dodge are examples of such. Your thoughts? Not sure about Model A and T, since it is hard to fathom proportions for cars with such extreme production numbers?. I have a feeling they were excellent cars for the first 20 years or so, but maybe ;not thereafter (tended to be mostly scrapped before reaching old age)?. Maybe they were not worthy of an engine swap at a certain age?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always figured Desotos from the '50s must have been excellent cars considering their survival rate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Survival rate can be tricky, though, on judging how good or bad a car might be.

A lot of cars got put in barns and sheds, and forgotten for years, because they "broke", or were too much trouble to keep running.

A study of survival rates and reasons would be fun.

Take the 36-37 Cord. Made 2500 or so, and there are something like 1500 still around. Does that make sense? Well, car was mechanically difficult to keep on the road, but the reason for survival probably has to do more with styling, and everyone realizing what a "special" car it was. The same years they made 10's of thousands of Oldsmobiles, yet how many do you see? Very few, and survival rate for those two years Olds probably well under that 1500 of the Cord.

I really like my little Model 20 Hupmobile, yet there are hundreds and hundreds of them still in existence. It's a good little car, but underpowered, and with only two forward gears it's miserable in hilly country. I'd be willing to bet the Model 20 Hupp, from 1909-1911, outnumber Model T's from the same years, although the numbers were miniscule compared to T production (Hupp, 1500 in 1909, 5000 in 1910, for example.....) Model T's got used and used.....and used up, and finding an early example is tough...even though they made a lot of them...

Not saying DeSoto's aren't good cars, and don't know the specific reason that they survived as mentioned, but sometimes survival is because a car isn't on the road, not because it's a runner....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the peramiters of lower production and higher survival rates I would think the Mercedes "Heckflosse" or fintail sedans of the 60s in both diesal and gas form were pretty well built. I have recently noticed how these often show up in outstanding original condition on a couple of MB forums I visit often. Usually the interiors are like new, and many times the cars are rock solid and require little to get roadworthy again. While not powerhouses, I think they fit your criteria.

David, agree on your thoughts on the Cords - and it does amaze me how many of those Hupp runabouts are out there, someone local to me has 3 of them, I believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Survival rates definitely hurt more than help. The Continental Mark II is a perfect example. Only 3,000 were produced, but 1800 still exist.

While the Mark II had some quality-control issues it is truly built like a tank.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe not as old as you would like. But, The Toughest and most reliable cars I have ever owned have been mid 70's Chevy Novas with a 250 CID 6 and a three speed automatic transmission. Dandy Dave!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im going to have to say Ford trucks from the 69 to 75.

From what I see, they are the most common vintage vehicle on the road today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Im going to have to say Ford trucks from the 69 to 75.

From what I see, they are the most common vintage vehicle on the road today.

I have to agree, when I was in my teens, my Dad had a 1969 Ford F150 pickup, with a 3 on the tree. I remember I loved to drive it, it was tough, and more than once I drove it hard, shifted it hard and abused it a bit. She kept on running and took the abuse. A great truck as far as I was concerned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know BUT, I'll define "rare car" for you; either nobody wanted that make /model /body style /mechanical nightmare when new OR the average person could not afford it. Thus Vegas and Duesenbergs are both rare. And many many more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't know BUT, I'll define "rare car" for you------Thus Vegas and Duesenbergs are both rare. And many many more.

Those two cars in the same sentence!!! This is gonna be a fun topic!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any Chrysler/Dodge/Plymouth product from the early to mid 60's with the slant six would be a good bet. They were nothing that exciting but those cars were well built, tough and would keep running with little effort. I had one and it couldn't be killed until someone got to it and stripped it for everything it was worth. For all I know the engine and transmission are probably still running in some crook's jalopy.

The same thing is probably true about the cars that were powered by the flathead six that was replaced by the slant six.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Easily the hardiest mass produced automobile ever built was the Model A Ford, 1928-1931.

Was over built for its time due to the stubbornness of Henry Ford, who refused to give up on the Model T

and rejected most attempts to produce a successor.

Out sold by /Chevrolet every year of it's manufacture, it has been the dominate car in all antique car events

for 50 years. Look around and you'll see 300 Model A's or more for every Chevrolet of the samr vinatage,

and they sold more Chevie's than Model A's. Loved by farmers, kids, ladies, cheapskates and antique car

guys on a budget, nothing else comes close.

In addition to the all steel body in most models, the durable 4 cylinder engine always leaked water pump

grease into the water jacket and the block never rusted out.

I thinks it will be hard to argue with the Model A Ford on this question.

Edited by Paul Dobbin
additional thought (see edit history)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My father always opined that the flathead 6 Mopars of the late 1940s were the first cars he ever encountered that routinely would do over 100,000 miles with simple maintenance, often well over. His best friend bought a '51 Plymouth from him that he ran up over 250,000 miles on the original drivetrain (although with repairs, of course).

Of the cars of my generation it's hard to top the oft hated Japanese makes from the mid-1970s on, the smaller and simpler the better. If you could keep them from rusting (which gets a lot easier after about 1985), you almost have to look for an excuse to retire one. However even they pale in comparison to the European near-luxury cars of the 1970s and 1980s, especially any rear wheel drive Volvo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In 1928 Chevrolet outsold Ford, 1,193,212 to 607,592, probably in part because Ford was a brand new car and had new car wrinkles to iron out. In 1929 Ford outsold Chevy 1,507,123 to 1,328,605 and Chevy had the new 6-cylinder engine competing against a 4-cylinder. In 1930 Ford again outsold Chevy, this time 1,140,710 to 640,980. In 1931 Chevrolet outsold Ford by about 4,000 cars, 619,554 for Chevy, 615,455 for Ford. This gives Chevrolet a total of 3,782,351 cars during the 4 years of the Model A run and Ford totalled 3,870,889 for the four years which gives Ford an edge of 88,538 cars for the 4 years. Edsel was #12 in sales in 1958 and has a reputation of having numerous quality problems but you see them at shows and never see a Buick, Olds, Pontiac, Mercury, Plymouth, Dodge and very few Fords from that year. Ford was the number 1 car in 1957 but for every '57 Ford you see you'll probably see a dozen or more Chevies and not a single Pontiac, Olds or Plymouth. Corvairs didn't sell well but you see one or two at every show you go to. I think some cars like '57 and '58 Packards stayed around simply because they were so butt ugly that they were different. I'm sure '49 to '52 Plymouths, Dodges, DeSotos, Chryslers, Pontiacs, Oldsmobiles, and Mercurys were good cars and sold well but where are they today? Maybe someone should start a new thread about cars that were attactive and dependable and sold well years ago but have disappeared today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Survival rates can be a tricky business as mentioned above. There were many nice Oldsmobiles built in relatively large numbers from about 1949 to 1953 but there are very few surviving today as compared to Buicks and Cadillacs even given the much lower Cadillac production numbers. The reason I believe is that these OLdsmobiles wound up being raced to destruction after they passed out of the hands of the original owners. I don't remember too many people racing Cadillacs and Buicks from these years. The Buick Century models from 1955 and 1956 with the nailhead V-8 were a different story compared to the old straight eights; but perhaps the slow-on-the-takeoff straight eights with Dynaflow might explain their relative abundance today.

Just my 2 cents.

Joe, BCA 33493

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I second the vote for a slant six Chrysler product. Best built economy car of its time from the standpoint of quality, longevity and service especially considering the low price. Although quite tinny and not at all luxurious.

Here is one that rather surprised me. Maurice Hendry, an expert on luxury cars of the twenties, thirties and forties, thought well of Packard and Lincoln but stated that for sheer grinding hard work, nothing could outlast a Cadillac.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

About the Vega. They got a bad reputation because of some easily rectified defects that Chevrolet took too long to fix. It was too bad because the fixes were not very difficult or expensive. I know of some later ones that gave excellent service for over 100,000 miles without complaint. I drove one and was very impressed by its smooth quiet comfortable ride. It drove like a big car.

You must remember that they were selling against the Pinto, VW beetle, Plymouth Cricket, AMC Gremlin and in that group they looked pretty good.

Many people shunned Vegas and bought Monzas and were happy with them, even though a Monza was a Vega with a restyled body.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Chevies vs. Ford Model A, the Chevies didn't survive because of wooden body construction, there's virtually no wood in a Model A. That's one of the main reasons you see 100 model A's for every chevy..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Chevies vs. Ford Model A, the Chevies didn't survive because of wooden body construction, there's virtually no wood in a Model A. That's one of the main reasons you see 100 model A's for every chevy..

That's the most sensible explanation I've heard yet.

On another example. My father has a 1910 Sears. They built about 3500, and there about 230 known surviving. Built well and very simple.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
About the Vega. They got a bad reputation because of some easily rectified defects that Chevrolet took too long to fix. It was too bad because the fixes were not very difficult or expensive. I know of some later ones that gave excellent service for over 100,000 miles without complaint. I drove one and was very impressed by its smooth quiet comfortable ride. It drove like a big car.

You must remember that they were selling against the Pinto, VW beetle, Plymouth Cricket, AMC Gremlin and in that group they looked pretty good.

Subtract the Cricket, and there isn't one car in that bunch I'd trade for a Vega (except maybe a Pinto that hadn't yet been in for the gas tank recall). Throw in Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla, Datsun 1200 & 510, Fiat 128, Subaru (not incl. the 360) and a few others (late Renault 10s, etc) and it becomes a torrent of better cars for the money.

Many people shunned Vegas and bought Monzas and were happy with them, even though a Monza was a Vega with a restyled body.

...and usually an "Iron Duke" 151 cu. in. 4 cylinder engine! The later versions of the Pontiac Astre clone of the Vega came with an Iron Duke instead of the aluminum Vega motor, and (minus the identical rust issues) it was twice the car the Vega was.

Edited by Dave@Moon
typo (see edit history)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course the first generation T-Birds have an excellent survival rate and are also well made, good performing cars. When looking, focus on getting a dry climate, rust free car. That is the best way to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a very tough topic to define in that hardy durability and survival rate are not really the same thing. As a percentage the Duesenburg survival rate is huge--they were obviously rare when new but easily 60-70% must still be around. And most were not on the road being driven like a Model A, many survived because they were in storage and the owner could not afford to keep them running. Plus they were recognized early as being worthy of preservation, much like other 1930s Classics and 1955-57 TBirds.

Old timers have told me just what Trimacar said about Model As--that though almost as many Chevys were produced after their hard lives in the Depression an all-steel Model A body would easily outlive a wood framed Chevy body. Ironically a similar issue probably is seen in the popular slant six Mopars, Mustangs and Buick/Olds/Pontiacs of the 1960s and 1970s. The mechanicals were excellent but the bodies often rusted to oblivion and resulted in scrapping the car.

I will throw another wrench in the works and point out that as a percentage Fiat and Alfa Spiders and British roadsters probably have a very good survival rate but hardly have a great reputation for durability (misunderstood, of course).

So all that said I would say that as a COMBINATION of quality, hardy durability, good design, and a large number of survivors my nod must go to two big icons--Model As and 1955-57 Chevys (first year teething problems noted). Good topic, Todd C

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I Bought two vegas both used one went well over the 100,000 mark before trading it. The other one is a 75 cosworth super car that I will keep untill one of us Quits. BILL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I gotta weigh in about the 30's Dodge as originally mentioned. All Dodge's were built with all steel bodies, the 30's cars have full pressure oiling and hydraulic brakes. The flathead 6 built in 1935- 1959 is the same engine.( Someone swapped in a 56 into my 36. ) You can still get parts at NAPA today. The lower rooflines gave a "chopped look" right from the factory. Etc, etc. I know mine will outlast me.

However, the model A has gotta be the all time king. They are still everywhere.:cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this