Sign in to follow this  
john2dameron

Your favorite and least favorite facelifts.

Recommended Posts

I've found the thread on families of cars interesting but since it seems to be getting contentious I thought I would veer off on a different track in a new thread.

We know that during the fifties and sixties most companies operated on a 3-year pattern with updates or facelifts in the off years. Which ones do you think worked the best and which ones did you not like?

Chrysler made minor changes for 1950, mostly cleaning up the grilles and rearends and it was an improvement. Ford made minor changes in 1950 that made a better looking car; Chevy made minor changes that had little effect on the car overall but their facelifts in 1951 and 1952 worked for me. Mercury's 1951 was a good improvement as was the '53 Ford. '54 and '56 Mercurys were good efforts. Some of the best facelifts ever were the '56 Ford and the '56 Buick. The '57 Pontiac was a great facelift. Some that failed completely in my eyes were the '56-58 Studebakers, the '59 Edsel, and the worst of all time, the '60 Buick. It had to be a sin to do to the '59 Buick what they did in 1960.

Okay, now you know how I feel, what's see what you think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

69 Camaro vs the 67 & 68

they were the best of all 3 year facelifts ...

least favorite is the 57 Chevy (vs 55 & 56 - that is MY opinion, some people like the 57 Chevy, I don't - when compared to the 55 & 56)

Edited by Jim Rohn (see edit history)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Best would be 1955-56 Packard from the 1951-54

Worst is 1960 Pontiac from the 1959, and the already mentioned 1959 Edsel from 1958

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have a 1963-1/2 Ford Falcon Sprint convertible. Both Bill and I like the rounded look of the '60 to '63 Falcons. The facelift in '63-1/2 with the Sprint chrome package and more powerful engine was a good one, at least for what we like. :cool: We aren't that fond of the facelift done in '64-'65 where they turned the rounded look into sharp angles and made the cars into more of a wedge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting a little more specific, the "facelifted" dash of the '57 Chevrolet bothers me more than the revisions to the exterior...

The '55 & '56 Chevies had such an elegant dash; why GM had to abandon it and go to that horrid, lumpy, "pod-festival" is beyond my ken...

Complete cars: I think the 1956 versions of the Chrysler & De Soto are very handsome revisions, if conservative ones.

Don't know if it was a "facelift" or a clean-sheet design, but the 1960 Ford full-size has got to be one of the homeliest things on four wheels, unlike the '59 or '61.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It had to be a sin to do to the '59 Buick what they did in 1960.

I disagree. I think the 1960 was refined over the '59, same with Cadillac.

I didn't like the face lift on the 58 Dodges over the '57. '58's were over done, but yet liked the job they did with the '59's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We have a 1963-1/2 Ford Falcon Sprint convertible. Both Bill and I like the rounded look of the '60 to '63 Falcons. The facelift in '63-1/2 with the Sprint chrome package and more powerful engine was a good one, at least for what we like. :cool: We aren't that fond of the facelift done in '64-'65 where they turned the rounded look into sharp angles and made the cars into more of a wedge.

Susan, I agree with you on the Falcons. The 63 1/2 was the prettiest of all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with Susan. The best looking Falcons were '63 and older. The Chrysler and DeSoto in '56 was a good one but Chrysler and DeSoto's best efforts were the '57-60 300 Letter Cars and the Adventurers. I thought '58 was Ford's poorest effort of the decade but the '60 convertible and the '63 Galaxie 500XL are two of my favorite cars. I also liked the '59 Pontiac but I love the '60 model. I think it is the best looking car GM built that year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I'm partial to the 61 cadillac revamp. Quad fins and long straight lines, make it look like its hurtling through space standing still. By 63 the quad fins were gone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess there is no accounting for taste. To me the 1960 is one of the best looking Pontiacs ever made while the 1959 is one of the worst. The 60 is a sleek well integrated design that flows. The 59 seems to be fighting itself especially the tailfins.

Likewise the 1960 Ford is much better looking than the 59 which was a facelifted 57, or the 1961 that was facelifted to look like a 1957. Some experts at the time felt the 60 Ford didn't sell because it was too sophisticated for a low price car.

Call me nuts but the 1960 Ford station wagon is especially sleek, one of the best looking station wagons ever made.

Possibly the worst looking redesign ever was the 1948-1950 Packard "pregnant elephant" facelift of the 1941-47 Clipper.

Edited by Rusty_OToole (see edit history)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another remarkable facelift was the 1963 - 64 Chryslers which were based on the tailfinned 1960 design. I don't think any other car changed its character so much in a facelift.

The 63 Chrysler is a sophisticated design that is unjustly overlooked on lists of the best styling jobs of all time. In fact BMW's top luxury models of the 1990s look like copies of a 30 year old Chrysler.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Favorite: 1990-1991 Lesabre smoother rear and better grille, Chrysler Imperial 1958, with larger fins, etc.

Least favorite: Postwar refits of ancient models, I do however like the grilles on the postwar lincolns (not saying that because I own one, but, I have always liked them)

1967-1968 Mustangs look terrible, with those horrible rear ends

late 70's vettes looked horrible too with the bubble windows

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always likes the look of the 57 Dodge pickup truck over the Newer 58's, and 59's of following years. The 57 nose, was a one year only on the pickups. Dandy Dave!

Here is a link. The 58 is on the bottom.

Dodge Sweptside Trucks

Edited by Dandy Dave
Add a link. (see edit history)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the 60 Buick and Caddy being polished from some awkwardness in the 59's. The headlight change on the Buick in particular. The 63 Chrysler isn't a facelift, it's an all new design.

how about 55 Packard as a successful one and 53 Studebaker Starlight turning into a 58 "Packard" Hawk as a bad one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With newer cars, the first refresh of the Ford Taurus was very well done. The second redo, that Ovoid mess, was IMHO THE worst of all time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One of the worst changes for me was the 1969 Dodge Coronet to the "dual horse collar" front on the 1970...

post-37352-143138494584_thumb.jpg

post-37352-14313849459_thumb.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Well, I think 59 Pontiac's are pretty fine Rusty. I also think 60 Pontiac is fine too, however Pontiac styling seemed to think the 59's were on the mark and because of that with the exception of the sixty Pontiac, every Pontiac built after 60 had a split grille styling from the 59. Of all the 59 GM product, Pontiac's fins were the most conservative of the five divisions and IMO came off the best. Buick sales went into a tail spin for years because of their front to rear upswing front to rear body crease and canted headlamps. Buick tried to correct it somewhat in the 60 model. The car that really gets me is the 66 Olds Toronado...a total stunner... Olds should have left that car alone, but instead turned it into a barge with those bumpers especially from 1968. Sometimes new isn't always better. 1949-50 Chevy/Pontiac/Olds got the same treatment the Toronado got so that by 1952 the purity of the design was changed just to be different. Same with ( one of this GM mans favorite cars ) the 57 Ford to the 58. Man, one of the best shapes ruined. The 57 Fairlane......500! is so sharp. So sharp that Ford outsold everyones beloved-everyone wants one 1957 Chevy.

A interesting one is the square T-bird, The 59 looks better than the 58 or 60. The 59 has the grille that customizers were using in the era.

I think speaking in general terms the first out of the gate were better because they were more pure to the concept.

Don

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Linc400 that the 1955-56 Packard was one of the BEST facelifts, but do not agree that the 1960 Pontiac was a bad one, I am partial to the 1960 as are many Pontiac people.

I also agree the 1957 Pontiac is one of the best. I think the 1960 Chevy was much improved over the bat wing 1959, and while I do not dislike 1960 Buick & Olds I do not think they are exactly beautiful.

For the worst, I think the 1961 Plymouth is bizarre and ugly and Dodges are not much better. Then the new 1962s were almost equally ugly, but their facelift into becoming relabeled as intermediates for 1964-67 may be one of the most successful of all. But maybe just because the originals were so bad. Todd C

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I should add that I agree with 1948 Lincoln that the 1946-48 grilles were improved over the 1942 and will also add that the 1946-48 Chrysler was too. Todd

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The ones that got me were the 1966 big Chevy vs the 65, and the 1970 vs the 69. The 66 looked like it had run into a wall and flattened its nose, and the 1970 looked like it couldn't decide if it wanted to be a Chevy or an early 60s Cadillac. The 65, 67, 68 and 69 "do it" for me as far as Chevys go though.

Most anything with 1st generation Federal bumpers was not an improvement.

Am I the only one who noticed that from 1976-80, all the "personal luxury" cars from all manufacturers looked essentially alike, with their pseudo-Classic grilles and stacked rectangular headlights? As in a Monte Carlo was an Elite was a Cordoba. They ALL looked alike.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
The ones that got me were the 1966 big Chevy vs the 65, and the 1970 vs the 69. The 66 looked like it had run into a wall and flattened its nose, and the 1970 looked like it couldn't decide if it wanted to be a Chevy or an early 60s Cadillac. The 65, 67, 68 and 69 "do it" for me as far as Chevys go though. D.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Different strokes I guess. I like the 66, 71-74, and your right rocketraider, they do look like Cadillac! and not a problem! D.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Most anything with 1st generation Federal bumpers was not an improvement.

-----------------------------------------------------

1974+Corvette pulled that off, so did Cadillac and the large Buick, I love those Electra 225 hardtop sedans of 76 with the wildcat mags. The Coupe de Ville downsized series too. There is good out there you just have to look a little harder. D.

---------------------------------------------------------

Am I the only one who noticed that from 1976-80, all the "personal luxury" cars from all manufacturers looked essentially alike, with their pseudo-Classic grilles and stacked rectangular headlights? As in a Monte Carlo was an Elite was a Cordoba. They ALL looked alike.

Cadillac Seville 75-79, and Eldorado 1979- early 80's.... If I only had more room!

Don

Edited by helfen (see edit history)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the 60 cadillac made the 59 design more beautiful, as did the 60 pontiac to the 59 pontiac, the 60 buick failed the beautiful 59 buick, and the 61 buick failed even more so. cadillac failed all the eldorados that came after the 67 to 70 body style, and those first generation of front wheel drive toronados and eldorados should have had a retractable hardtop option. as did pontiac and chevy failed to give buyers a 69 to 72 grand prix or monte carlo convertables. the packard hawk really failed the studebaker hawks. where the 56 pontiac failed the 55 pontiacs, the 57 pontiacs more than made up for it. the 53-54 pontiacs were a wonderful facelift of the 49 to 52 pontiacs, charles coker, 1953 pontiac tech advisor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As for the intermediate Plymouths/Dodges any thing would have been better than the mistakes of 1962/63. In regard to the Corvettes, all other Corvettes are better looking than those of 1968-82. As for GM, 1960 Buicks and Oldsmobile were pitiful excuses for a car. The '57-58 Packards including the Packard Hawks were a disgrace to the Packard Motorcar Company.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
As for the intermediate Plymouths/Dodges any thing would have been better than the mistakes of 1962/63. In regard to the Corvettes, all other Corvettes are better looking than those of 1968-82. As for GM, 1960 Buicks and Oldsmobile were pitiful excuses for a car. The '57-58 Packards including the Packard Hawks were a disgrace to the Packard Motorcar Company.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think you meant 1960-62 Chrysler product. The new bodies come in 63. Even so the Plymouth and Dodge for 63 have some weird looking ft ends. The 64 Plymouth Belvedere finally gets it right- a nice front end too. Belvedere has another great two years 66-67 and another 68-70. The big Fury dosen't make it from 65-70. Of the 65-67 big Fords, the 66 is best with 67 a big 2nd.

Sorry Susan, I like all Falcons until Ford styling ruined it forever with the new body in 1966.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this