Sign in to follow this  
windjamer

seat belts,your thoughts

Recommended Posts

Bottom line, the CHOICE should be MINE.

wj, The choice is still yours to make. You just have to be willing to accept the consequences for your actions if you choose not to wear it. Be they a fine, jail time, or being maimed or killed in a wreck. NO ONE is going to show up every time you get into your vehicle and force you at gun point to put it on. It is still up to you to choose. I personally hope you choose to wear it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ah, but safety is hardly the limiting factor in how you effect others, is it? Has anyone even suggested that their saftey is compromised by someone else not wearing a seat belt? Or my example of walking accross a bridge on the railing for that matter?

There are plenty of ways you effect me when you don't wear your seat belt, not the least of which is financial. This isn't even an arguable point any more. Making it one, and representing it here as legitimate, effects me and our hobby negatively as well. It's all well and good to be an independent cowboy, but a thoughtless independent cowboy is a dangerous thing.

You can limit your focus to make the argument you want. It's a common practice in human relations and politics, one that often succeeds but never delivers positive results. icon13.gif

If someone has no brake lights on a dark road and comes to a sudden stop, this does affect whether or not I may be able to stop in time. If someone hits me, and they are not wearing a seatbelt, I don't see how this affects me. If they are injured because they did not wear one, this does not affect me. If you want to argue that their families are affected or there could be lawsuits etc. the same argument applies to a motorcyclist not wearing a helmet. But that is legal. I have been in a head on collision and was not wearing my seat belt. I didn't have a scratch. I suppose I was lucky but, I credit the 5000 lb. Lincoln I was driving a lot more than luck. I most definitely would not want to be on a motorcycle in a head on collision with or without helmet. But a helmet is not required. So why is my seatbelt? I am not against seatbelts. I am against seatbelts being a law.

Edited by LINC400 (see edit history)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here in W. Va. they passed a law and by this fall or next our school buses will have seatbelts. I know that in the past the members of the state board of education were worried that students might use the belts/buckles as a way to hurt other kids. But parents have lobbied that if kids must be in a booster seat or seatbelt in a car they should also be in one on a school bus.

I baby-sit for a total of seven kids in three families. I purchased a full booster seat complete with the back and arms for the five kids that are out of the car seat size. If I had to transport the two year old or the one year old I would have to borrow a carseat from the parents. I agree that the school board should provide the necessary protection for kids in their care.

My friend is a school bus driver. None of the buses are even equipped with seat belts. He also says his job is one step up from "Would you like fries with that?" He tells me stories about the complete stupidity of some of the drivers. Yet they are driving around a bus full of 40 or so kids in a society that supposedly places the safety of children above alll else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DUI checkpoints are never announced for the same reason.

In W. Va. they are and they have to be by law. AND, usually they are set up to where even if you didn't hear/read where they will be you can see them and turn around a go another way.

Last year a lady that I know through the Dalmatian Message Board I am on lost her soon-to-be daughter-in-law to a drunk young man driving at about 2:30 in the morning. They were on their way home from a visit to family further down in Fla. She was driving, her husband was in the passenger seat, their son was behind her and the young woman was behind my friend's husband.

The young man blew through a STOP sign in a turn lane and t-boned my friend's car. Jennifer was killed instantly. She had been asleep and never knew what happened. My friend's husband had multiple injuries including several breaks in his pelvis, leg and ribs. He was in the hospital for weeks and will never be the same. He still has some numbness in his leg. Their son was severly injured also. He spent a week in a medically induced coma to help him heal. His fiancee was buried before he was brought out of the coma. It was about a week after that they told him she had died at the scene. My friend was the least injured but she had a broken arm and ribs. They were all wearing seatbelts. Jennifer was killed because she was at the point of impact and that drunk young man was flying down the road.

It was just over a year ago. The last I heard the trial was starting. I have not heard what the verdict is, if there is one yet.

Why on earth my state would require that drunks be warned I have never figured out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
But a helmet is not required. So why is my seatbelt?<!-- google_ad_section_end -->

I see no need to reword this answer for the 16th or 17th time on this thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also noticed my insurance rates have gone up since seat belts were forced on us. Could it be that more people are injured in accidents; rather than killed because of seat belt use. With more injured people surviving, insurance companies (and taxpayers) pay out more for medical costs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I see no need to reword this answer for the 16th or 17th time on this thread.

The only answer I see to that is where you say because old Harley Guys vote. That doesn't seem like much of a reason.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The only answer I see to that is where you say because old Harley Guys vote. That doesn't seem like much of a reason.

Or folks vote for someone else.

In our case we both voted for our current governor the first time he ran for office. He and his wife own and ride a motorcycle. He made the mistake of saying that if the motorcyclists ever got the legislature to repeal our helmet law he would sign it. So this time we voted for the guy running against him. The guy didn't win but we would not vote for a governor that would sign a law to endanger the lives of our citizens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree in principal with the folks that do not like "mandatory". My dad was one of those. Would not wear his seat belt. UNTIL his insurance company threw in a clause that if he was killed while wearing his belt, his estate would receive an extra 10,000.00 dollars. Worked.

Ben

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why on earth my state would require that drunks be warned I have never figured out.

In this day and age drunk drivers should get the death penalty....... period!

I've seen and heard of too many families torn apart because of some irresponsible drunk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As for all of this talk about something shouldn't be 'manditory,' it is ridiculous.

Every safety part of your car meets a 'manditory' standard. It is called the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard, or FMVSS. You will see it stamped on a lot of parts on your car, usually something like "Meets FMVSS XXX." Those standards are not voluntary, and if you found out GM, Ford or any one else sold you a vehicle that didn't pass a major FMVSS, you would be calling your lawyer.

Also, everything connected with your car or truck meets manditory standards that you expect or even demand they meet. Anyone want to buy 83 octane gas, when the pump says it is 87? How about a station that dispenses .89 gallons, but charges you for 1.00 gallons? Anyone want to drive on a highway with stripes that wash off after two or three rainstorms? Nope.

So, these non-helmet, non-seatbelt people don't want to be told what to do by the government, but the companies making the products they drive, drive on, ride in, use to move their car or truch had BETTER meet those standards.

To all those who have made a clear and sometimes personal case for seat belts, it is time to stop. Go wash and wax your car, ride in your classic convertible with the top down, go to a swap meet or shop for a part on ebay. The people who know the value of seat belts couldn't be talked out of wearing them on this or any other forum. Those who don't know or don't WANT to know won't wear them.

Joe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My dad was one of those. Would not wear his seat belt. UNTIL his insurance company threw in a clause that if he was killed while wearing his belt, his estate would receive an extra 10,000.00 dollars. Worked.

Ben

Our insurance doubles the coverage for anyone in the car/truck/RV if they are wearing their seatbelt. Even "Furball" (a stuffed toy blue cat) that rides in the PT wears a seatbelt. The kids see it and love it. I never have to argue with any of them about their seatbelt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, these non-helmet, non-seatbelt people don't want to be told what to do by the government, but the companies making the products they drive, drive on, ride in, use to move their car or truch had BETTER meet those standards.

To all those who have made a clear and sometimes personal case for seat belts, it is time to stop. Go wash and wax your car, ride in your classic convertible with the top down, go to a swap meet or shop for a part on ebay. The people who know the value of seat belts couldn't be talked out of wearing them on this or any other forum. Those who don't know or don't WANT to know won't wear them.

Joe

Yes that is correct. Companies should not be allowed to sell products that are sub-par or unsafe because consumers are not aware of what risks might be involved. So there should be laws and regulations for that. Someone who chooses not to wear a seatbelt or helmet is aware of what risks they are taking, it does not affect the safety of someone buying a product, and they should be allowed to make their own decision.

Also there are probably hundreds of thousands of topics on here. They end when no one has anything more to say. However, it seems to be a more common occurrence that when one individual decides that they don't want to read any more about the subject, they announce it should be ended. I have posted quite enough on this subject. However, maybe someone else is just seeing this for the first time now and would like to add something, whatever their viewpoint. Why should someone else decide that a topic is done and nothing more should be added? My understanding was that everyone was free to reply to whatever post they wanted. If you don't want to read any more about a subject. Then don't read any more about the subject. Don't tell others to stop posting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not telling anyone to stop posting. But there is such as thing as doing something knowing that it won't make any difference.

Your post that says people 'should be allowed to make their own decision' validates the point I was making; the people that want to not wear them are not thinking about it; they have already decided.

So, post all you wish. But, I don't think it is going to change anyone's mind. And, if you are fairly certain that nothing will be accomplished, the only reason to post is.....????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Brake lights on cars ,however, are for the safety of other drivers. Seat belts are not. They only affect the person wearing or not wearing it.

And again, as soon as you send my my check, I'll agree with you completely. Until then it DOES affect someone else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This argument can, and will, go on forever. I will add my two cents. I have been wearing a seat belt since the law was passed in NY in 1984. I was ten years old at the time. I did not wear one before that, and my parents whined and complained about the law at the time.

I started riding motorcycles at age 14, always with a helmet, but not always with proper gear. I was hit by a car at age 15 while riding a Honda scooter. Helmeted, but no gloves. I still have the scar on the back of my hand. I gave up the BMW motorcycle (I evolved) last year because I couldn't ride it anymore without feeling guilty about my daughter, and what would happen if I were killed or left a vegetable. However, I NEVER rode without a helmet, gloves, boots, and a real motorcycle jacket with armor. I remember riding through CT (no helmet law) and not getting waves back from the riders that were riding "naked." They had not yet evolved. I don't need a law to be intelligent.

A good friend of mine in the Franklin Club is a retired surgeon. He would just shake his head when discussing motorcycles, and he would chastise me for not having seat belts in the Franklin. He was broad-sided by a firetruck while driving a '32 Franklin like mine. The car was rolled, and he walked away. When my daughter was born, I installed belts in the car. I now feel foolish for not installing them sooner.

A few weeks ago, I posted a thread asking members' thoughts on installing seat belts in my father's 1910 Sears Highwheeler. I quickly deleted the tread after being berated by others for even asking. My dad feels that being strapped into a car like this is like being belted into a motorcycle because it is so flimsy. However, even a minor collision at the Sears' 20 mph top speed could be fatal if the passengers are ejected, while remaining inside whatever frame the car has is better than being thrown onto the road.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Seat belts save lives.

What I object to is this.

I drove 200 miles home from a car show with my seat belt on. I stopped at a fast food drive in 5 blocks from my house on the way home. I had to take off my seat belt to get my wallet and change. I forgot to put it back on. I got a ticket from a cop and a lecture about safety. Afterwards, he did a U-turn in front of oncoming traffic, sped off at about 65 mph in a 40 mph zone, and cut across traffic to go to the fast food place I just came from. I don't think I should be getting a ticket and lecture on safety from him.

On my way to work I am wearing my seatbelt. I am delayed for 20 minutes in traffic because the police have set up a roadblock to ticket people not wearing seat belts. I am late for work and docked pay so that the police can tie up traffic collecting revenue.

If I was helmetless on a motorcycle, far more dangerous than without a seat belt in a car, nothing would happen to me. No lectures, no tickets. If seat belts weren't the law, there would be no revenue road block, and I would not get docked pay because of it.

Can anyone here provide statistics showing that insurance premiums have gone down since seat belt laws have been enacted? Mine have gone up, regardless of whether I am wearing my seat belt or not, and regardless of others are wearing one or not. So perhaps Joe should be sending me checks since seat belts are the law as he wants, and my insurance is still going up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Linc400, get ready for the hot new law being enforced in Illinois. The move over for emergency equipment law. It is being heavily enforced on Chicago roadways. I'm all for NOT ramming any vehicles or people who have to do their work on the shoulder of fast moving roadways. I drive a commercial vehicle working road construction and I am the guy on the side of the roadway. My only question is how does this one work out? You crest a hill and a squad is parked on the shoulder. You signal and make every effort to move over. The traffic next to you will not yield. That squad now pulls you down and issues YOU the citation.

I'm all for any and all safety items that can be built into vehicles, but I highly believe you are correct about the tickets. It's about the REVENUE.

I also rode many miles in a car without a seat belt on and even clocked many miles on a bike with no helmet as a kid.

Still here. Just dumb luck I guess. Let's all slow down our bad driving habits and give all that safety equipment and the poor insurance companies a break!!

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Linc400, I agree with you 100%. It's a retarded law and hopefully we can get it repealed one day. Just like any thing else you need to follow the money to find the truth. In the 1980s congress was attempting to push the car makers into installing air bags. The big three lobbied instead to force us to wear seat belts to improve safety, and delayed the costly air bag systems.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I HAVE USED Seat Belts since I was 17 early 70"S CALIFORNIA

street racing in old PONTIACS and PLYMOUTH BELVEDERES

It was the only way to stay in the seats . i HAVE BEEN STOPED IN MY 63 RIVY BUT THEY

CAN NOT GIVE YOU A TICKET IF YOUR CAR NEVER HAD SEAT BELTS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A body in motion tends to stay in motion unless acted on by an outside force.

Isaac Newton.

Why anyone would argue for the freedom to make the choice to remain unrestrained in 2 tons of steel traveling at speed is beyond me. Our government is in the process of turning the United States into a socialist state and a mandatory safety requirement that saves lives is eroding our rights? How about the nationalization of the automobile and health industries? Can we see the forest for the trees?

This helmet/seatbelt argument should be left to petulant children. Even when the benefits are obvious we know they don't like to be told what to do.

Nanny: "Johnny, eat your peas, they're good for you."

Johnny: "Why should I? You're not my Mother and I don't want to and you can't make me."

Nanny: "Then don't wear your seatbelt either and die in a horrible car crash you foolish boy."

For the grownups there are much bigger fish to fry.

Edited by Oxnard Montalvo (see edit history)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Politics such as health care are not to be discussed here. You do not need to have a seatbelt law if you want to wear a seat belt. It works just as well without it being legally required. The law is a revenue raiser under the guise of being oh so concerned with our safety. Why are they not required on a school bus? Isn't the safety of children top priority? But children on a school bus can't pay tickets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They're not required on school buses because buses are designed (poorly) to contain the children where they are, hence the close, high backed seats.

Plus, children (like some adults) don't always do what's good for them so who's going to ensure 40 grammar school kids are buckled up? Maybe the fines from noncompliant seatbelt uses can pay for bus monitors.

Massachusetts does not have a primary seatbelt law. Massachusetts is dead last in seatbelt compliance. How's that working out?

EMT: "This guy's hurt pretty bad, but he wasn't wearing his seatbelt."

Nurse: "Doctor, I know him. We must save him."

Doctor: "Nurse, you know what it means. Under the new federal guidelines for triage care concerning automobile accident victims I cannot care for this gentleman because he violated section 31 paragraph 5, seatbelt compliance. Too bad. He should have eaten his peas. Dump him in the back with the old people."

Edited by Oxnard Montalvo (see edit history)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EMT: "This guy's hurt pretty bad, but he wasn't wearing his seatbelt."

Nurse: "Doctor, I know him. We must save him."

Doctor: "Nurse, you know what it means. Under the new federal guidelines for triage care concerning automobile accident victims I cannot care for this gentleman because he violated section 31 paragraph 5, seatbelt compliance. Too bad. He should have eaten his peas. Dump him in the back with the old people."

Nice that you can amuse yourself with your own dialogues.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this